联合静脉注射和关节内注射氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换术中静脉注射和不治疗的比较:一个病例系列研究

C. Buntting, R. Sorial, S. Coffey, G. Eslick
{"title":"联合静脉注射和关节内注射氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换术中静脉注射和不治疗的比较:一个病例系列研究","authors":"C. Buntting, R. Sorial, S. Coffey, G. Eslick","doi":"10.15438/RR.6.2.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Excessive perioperative bleeding requiring transfusion remains a potential complication of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). There is overwhelming evidence supporting the efficacy of intravenous Tranexamic acid to reduce bleeding and the need for transfusion in TKA. There is still some question regarding the efficacy of other methods of Tranexamic acid administration. This case series study evaluated the effects of the use of intravenous Tranexamic acid administered alone, or in combination with intra-articular tranexamic acid on transfusion rate and other clinical outcomes; and compared this to a group of patients who received neither treatment. Method We conducted a case review of 150 patients who had undergone TKA from 2012-2015. 50 patients underwent TKA with IV Tranexamic acid (Group A). A further 50 patients underwent TKA with IV Tranexamic acid in combination with intra-articular administration of 2grams of Tranexamic acid in 20ml saline (Group B). A final 50 patients underwent TKA without the use of Tranexamic acid (non-treatment group). Outcome measures were transfusion rate, change in haemoglobin and haematocrit, medical review events, patient mortality and changes in knee flexion and extension measurements at six weeks after surgery. Results There were no significant differences in red blood cell transfusion rates between the non-treatment group and the two treatment groups, however an absolute reduction in transfusion rate from 8% to 0% (p=0.134) was observed. The mean change of haemoglobin level in the non-treatment group was 29 while in treatment groups A and B, this was 23 and 19 respectively (p=0.0001). No significant difference was observed between treatment group A and B.  There was a significant difference in post-operative haemoglobin level, where mean haemoglobin concentrations in non-treatment, Group A and B were 110 vs 115 vs 123 respectively (P= 0.0001). Pairwise comparison showed that Group B was significantly different when compared to both non treatment (p=0.0001) and treatment group A (p=0.020).  There were no significant differences observed in other outcomes. Conclusion This study supports the existing literature and suggests that the use of IV Tranexamic acid alone or in combination with intra-articular dose in TKA may reduce the requirement for transfusion (Level IV evidence). Furthermore, this study suggests that the use of tranexamic acid as a combination of Intravenous and intra-articular administration has no effect on range of motion, or medical complications during hospital stay. Although it was not a statistically significant finding, our study suggested a trend towards a greater reduction in haemoglobin and haematocrit fall in the combination therapy group when compared to IV Tranexamic acid alone","PeriodicalId":20884,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructive Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination Intravenous and Intra-Articular Tranexamic Acid Compared with Intravenous Only Administration and No Therapy in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series Study\",\"authors\":\"C. Buntting, R. Sorial, S. Coffey, G. Eslick\",\"doi\":\"10.15438/RR.6.2.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Excessive perioperative bleeding requiring transfusion remains a potential complication of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). There is overwhelming evidence supporting the efficacy of intravenous Tranexamic acid to reduce bleeding and the need for transfusion in TKA. There is still some question regarding the efficacy of other methods of Tranexamic acid administration. This case series study evaluated the effects of the use of intravenous Tranexamic acid administered alone, or in combination with intra-articular tranexamic acid on transfusion rate and other clinical outcomes; and compared this to a group of patients who received neither treatment. Method We conducted a case review of 150 patients who had undergone TKA from 2012-2015. 50 patients underwent TKA with IV Tranexamic acid (Group A). A further 50 patients underwent TKA with IV Tranexamic acid in combination with intra-articular administration of 2grams of Tranexamic acid in 20ml saline (Group B). A final 50 patients underwent TKA without the use of Tranexamic acid (non-treatment group). Outcome measures were transfusion rate, change in haemoglobin and haematocrit, medical review events, patient mortality and changes in knee flexion and extension measurements at six weeks after surgery. Results There were no significant differences in red blood cell transfusion rates between the non-treatment group and the two treatment groups, however an absolute reduction in transfusion rate from 8% to 0% (p=0.134) was observed. The mean change of haemoglobin level in the non-treatment group was 29 while in treatment groups A and B, this was 23 and 19 respectively (p=0.0001). No significant difference was observed between treatment group A and B.  There was a significant difference in post-operative haemoglobin level, where mean haemoglobin concentrations in non-treatment, Group A and B were 110 vs 115 vs 123 respectively (P= 0.0001). Pairwise comparison showed that Group B was significantly different when compared to both non treatment (p=0.0001) and treatment group A (p=0.020).  There were no significant differences observed in other outcomes. Conclusion This study supports the existing literature and suggests that the use of IV Tranexamic acid alone or in combination with intra-articular dose in TKA may reduce the requirement for transfusion (Level IV evidence). Furthermore, this study suggests that the use of tranexamic acid as a combination of Intravenous and intra-articular administration has no effect on range of motion, or medical complications during hospital stay. Although it was not a statistically significant finding, our study suggested a trend towards a greater reduction in haemoglobin and haematocrit fall in the combination therapy group when compared to IV Tranexamic acid alone\",\"PeriodicalId\":20884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reconstructive Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reconstructive Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.6.2.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructive Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.6.2.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

术中大量出血需要输血仍然是全膝关节置换术(TKA)的潜在并发症。有压倒性的证据支持静脉注射氨甲环酸在TKA中减少出血和输血需求的有效性。氨甲环酸其他给药方法的疗效仍有疑问。本病例系列研究评估了单独静脉注射氨甲环酸或联合关节内注射氨甲环酸对输血率和其他临床结果的影响;并将其与一组未接受任何治疗的患者进行比较。方法回顾性分析2012-2015年150例TKA患者的临床资料。50例患者行静脉注射氨甲环酸TKA (A组),50例患者行静脉注射氨甲环酸TKA联合关节内注射2g氨甲环酸20ml生理盐水TKA (B组),最后50例患者行不使用氨甲环酸TKA(非治疗组)。结果测量是输血率、血红蛋白和红细胞压积的变化、医学回顾事件、患者死亡率以及手术后6周膝关节屈伸测量的变化。结果非治疗组与两治疗组红细胞输注率无显著差异,但绝对输注率从8%降至0% (p=0.134)。非治疗组血红蛋白平均变化为29,治疗组为23,B组为19 (p=0.0001)。A组和B组术后血红蛋白水平差异有统计学意义,未治疗组、A组和B组的平均血红蛋白浓度分别为110、115、123 (P= 0.0001)。两两比较,B组与未治疗组(p=0.0001)和治疗组(p=0.020)比较,差异均有统计学意义。其他结果没有观察到显著差异。结论本研究支持现有文献,提示在TKA中单独使用氨甲环酸或联合关节内给药可减少输血需求(IV级证据)。此外,本研究表明氨甲环酸作为静脉和关节内给药的组合使用对住院期间的活动范围或医疗并发症没有影响。虽然这不是一个统计学上显著的发现,但我们的研究表明,与单独静脉注射氨甲环酸相比,联合治疗组血红蛋白和红细胞压积下降的趋势更大
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combination Intravenous and Intra-Articular Tranexamic Acid Compared with Intravenous Only Administration and No Therapy in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series Study
Introduction Excessive perioperative bleeding requiring transfusion remains a potential complication of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). There is overwhelming evidence supporting the efficacy of intravenous Tranexamic acid to reduce bleeding and the need for transfusion in TKA. There is still some question regarding the efficacy of other methods of Tranexamic acid administration. This case series study evaluated the effects of the use of intravenous Tranexamic acid administered alone, or in combination with intra-articular tranexamic acid on transfusion rate and other clinical outcomes; and compared this to a group of patients who received neither treatment. Method We conducted a case review of 150 patients who had undergone TKA from 2012-2015. 50 patients underwent TKA with IV Tranexamic acid (Group A). A further 50 patients underwent TKA with IV Tranexamic acid in combination with intra-articular administration of 2grams of Tranexamic acid in 20ml saline (Group B). A final 50 patients underwent TKA without the use of Tranexamic acid (non-treatment group). Outcome measures were transfusion rate, change in haemoglobin and haematocrit, medical review events, patient mortality and changes in knee flexion and extension measurements at six weeks after surgery. Results There were no significant differences in red blood cell transfusion rates between the non-treatment group and the two treatment groups, however an absolute reduction in transfusion rate from 8% to 0% (p=0.134) was observed. The mean change of haemoglobin level in the non-treatment group was 29 while in treatment groups A and B, this was 23 and 19 respectively (p=0.0001). No significant difference was observed between treatment group A and B.  There was a significant difference in post-operative haemoglobin level, where mean haemoglobin concentrations in non-treatment, Group A and B were 110 vs 115 vs 123 respectively (P= 0.0001). Pairwise comparison showed that Group B was significantly different when compared to both non treatment (p=0.0001) and treatment group A (p=0.020).  There were no significant differences observed in other outcomes. Conclusion This study supports the existing literature and suggests that the use of IV Tranexamic acid alone or in combination with intra-articular dose in TKA may reduce the requirement for transfusion (Level IV evidence). Furthermore, this study suggests that the use of tranexamic acid as a combination of Intravenous and intra-articular administration has no effect on range of motion, or medical complications during hospital stay. Although it was not a statistically significant finding, our study suggested a trend towards a greater reduction in haemoglobin and haematocrit fall in the combination therapy group when compared to IV Tranexamic acid alone
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-operative outcomes, including opioid utilization and length of stay, following total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective case matched series comparing conventional and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty Can Knees be Forgotten 2 Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty? Tranexamic Acid Should be Considered for High Risk Arthroplasty Patients Life Lost Too Soon: Navy Corpsman from Ohio Killed in Afghanistan Attack August 26, 2021 A Literature-Based Resource for the Development of Outpatient Arthroplasty Patient Selection Criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1