{"title":"水分施用和土壤耕作对垂直土壤水盐分布的影响","authors":"S. Assouline, M. Ben-Hur","doi":"10.2136/SSSAJ2003.0852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under limited water resources, modern irrigation methods tend to save water and improve water and salt regimes within the root zone. This study deals with the combined effects of water application methods and tillage practices on water and salt distributions, runoff production, and soil loss in a field irrigated with moving irrigation systems (MIS). An experiment was conducted in a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Sivon) field at Hazorea, Israel, where the main soil type is vertisol (Typic Chromoxerets). Sprinkling (SP) and flooding (FL) MIS, and conventional (CT) and microbasin (MB) tillage, were compared in terms of runoff and soil loss from runoff microplots (5 m 2 ), soil water content and salinity distribution with depth, yield, and plant height. Under SP conditions, no runoff and soil loss were obtained for either tillage practice. In the FL/CT treatment, the mean runoff and soil loss were about 25% of the irrigation water and 0.59 kg m -2 . The FL/MB treatment reduced the runoff and soil loss to 5.8% and 0.02 kg m -2 , respectively. The soil water contents in the SP treatments were generally lower than in the FL treatments, especially in the 0.1-to 0.6-m soil layer. No significant differences in the soil salinity, plant height, and seed-cotton yield were observed between the treatments. Microbasins tillage reduces water losses under flooding MIS to a point where they become practically similar to those obtained under sprinkler MIS. It can potentially lead to lower water losses if the microbasins storage capacity is matched to the water application rate, to avoid runoff.","PeriodicalId":22142,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"852-858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Water Applications and Soil Tillage on Water and Salt Distribution in a Vertisol\",\"authors\":\"S. Assouline, M. Ben-Hur\",\"doi\":\"10.2136/SSSAJ2003.0852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under limited water resources, modern irrigation methods tend to save water and improve water and salt regimes within the root zone. This study deals with the combined effects of water application methods and tillage practices on water and salt distributions, runoff production, and soil loss in a field irrigated with moving irrigation systems (MIS). An experiment was conducted in a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Sivon) field at Hazorea, Israel, where the main soil type is vertisol (Typic Chromoxerets). Sprinkling (SP) and flooding (FL) MIS, and conventional (CT) and microbasin (MB) tillage, were compared in terms of runoff and soil loss from runoff microplots (5 m 2 ), soil water content and salinity distribution with depth, yield, and plant height. Under SP conditions, no runoff and soil loss were obtained for either tillage practice. In the FL/CT treatment, the mean runoff and soil loss were about 25% of the irrigation water and 0.59 kg m -2 . The FL/MB treatment reduced the runoff and soil loss to 5.8% and 0.02 kg m -2 , respectively. The soil water contents in the SP treatments were generally lower than in the FL treatments, especially in the 0.1-to 0.6-m soil layer. No significant differences in the soil salinity, plant height, and seed-cotton yield were observed between the treatments. Microbasins tillage reduces water losses under flooding MIS to a point where they become practically similar to those obtained under sprinkler MIS. It can potentially lead to lower water losses if the microbasins storage capacity is matched to the water application rate, to avoid runoff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Science Society of America Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"852-858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Science Society of America Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSAJ2003.0852\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSAJ2003.0852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
在水资源有限的情况下,现代灌溉方法倾向于节约用水和改善根区内的水盐状况。本研究探讨了在移动灌溉系统(MIS)灌溉的农田中,用水方法和耕作方式对水盐分布、径流生产和土壤流失的综合影响。以棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L. cv.)为试验材料。在以色列Hazorea的Sivon油田,那里的主要土壤类型是垂直土壤(典型变色土壤)。研究比较了喷淋(SP)和淹水(FL)、常规(CT)和微盆(MB)耕作方式的径流和土壤流失情况,以及土壤含水量和盐分随深度、产量和株高的分布情况。在SP条件下,两种耕作方式均无径流和土壤流失。在FL/CT处理下,平均径流量和土壤流失量约为灌溉水的25%,为0.59 kg m -2。FL/MB处理使径流和土壤流失量分别减少5.8%和0.02 kg m -2。SP处理土壤含水量普遍低于FL处理,尤其在0.1 ~ 0.6 m土层。土壤盐分、株高和籽棉产量在不同处理间无显著差异。微流域耕作减少了洪水管理信息系统下的水分损失,使其几乎与喷灌管理信息系统下的水分损失相似。如果微流域的储水量与施水量相匹配,以避免径流,可能会导致更低的失水。
Effects of Water Applications and Soil Tillage on Water and Salt Distribution in a Vertisol
Under limited water resources, modern irrigation methods tend to save water and improve water and salt regimes within the root zone. This study deals with the combined effects of water application methods and tillage practices on water and salt distributions, runoff production, and soil loss in a field irrigated with moving irrigation systems (MIS). An experiment was conducted in a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Sivon) field at Hazorea, Israel, where the main soil type is vertisol (Typic Chromoxerets). Sprinkling (SP) and flooding (FL) MIS, and conventional (CT) and microbasin (MB) tillage, were compared in terms of runoff and soil loss from runoff microplots (5 m 2 ), soil water content and salinity distribution with depth, yield, and plant height. Under SP conditions, no runoff and soil loss were obtained for either tillage practice. In the FL/CT treatment, the mean runoff and soil loss were about 25% of the irrigation water and 0.59 kg m -2 . The FL/MB treatment reduced the runoff and soil loss to 5.8% and 0.02 kg m -2 , respectively. The soil water contents in the SP treatments were generally lower than in the FL treatments, especially in the 0.1-to 0.6-m soil layer. No significant differences in the soil salinity, plant height, and seed-cotton yield were observed between the treatments. Microbasins tillage reduces water losses under flooding MIS to a point where they become practically similar to those obtained under sprinkler MIS. It can potentially lead to lower water losses if the microbasins storage capacity is matched to the water application rate, to avoid runoff.
期刊介绍:
SSSA Journal publishes content on soil physics; hydrology; soil chemistry; soil biology; soil biochemistry; soil fertility; plant nutrition; pedology; soil and water conservation and management; forest, range, and wildland soils; soil and plant analysis; soil mineralogy, wetland soils. The audience is researchers, students, soil scientists, hydrologists, pedologist, geologists, agronomists, arborists, ecologists, engineers, certified practitioners, soil microbiologists, and environmentalists.
The journal publishes original research, issue papers, reviews, notes, comments and letters to the editor, and book reviews. Invitational papers may be published in the journal if accepted by the editorial board.