变革的使用:b谷歌图书案例的更新与乔纳森·班德

Cy Dillon
{"title":"变革的使用:b谷歌图书案例的更新与乔纳森·班德","authors":"Cy Dillon","doi":"10.21061/VALIB.V60I2.1296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of early concerns about the quality of its metadata, best summarized by Geoffrey Nunberg in the August 31, 2009 issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education , librarians have come to appreciate Google Books for its power to search millions of books and its potential as a “big data” source for the study of language and culture. Thus, the suits filed against Google by the Authors Guild and five publishers in 2005, which were soon consolidated, were viewed by many librarians as a threat to an irreplaceable resource. The suits asserted that Google’s scanning, maintaining a database for searching, and offering searchers short “snippets” of the text of books infringed on copyright. A proposed settlement failed in 2011, and the publishers dropped their litigation in 2012.","PeriodicalId":29991,"journal":{"name":"Virginia Libraries","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transformative Use: An Update on the Google Books Case with Jonathan Band\",\"authors\":\"Cy Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.21061/VALIB.V60I2.1296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In spite of early concerns about the quality of its metadata, best summarized by Geoffrey Nunberg in the August 31, 2009 issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education , librarians have come to appreciate Google Books for its power to search millions of books and its potential as a “big data” source for the study of language and culture. Thus, the suits filed against Google by the Authors Guild and five publishers in 2005, which were soon consolidated, were viewed by many librarians as a threat to an irreplaceable resource. The suits asserted that Google’s scanning, maintaining a database for searching, and offering searchers short “snippets” of the text of books infringed on copyright. A proposed settlement failed in 2011, and the publishers dropped their litigation in 2012.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virginia Libraries\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virginia Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21061/VALIB.V60I2.1296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/VALIB.V60I2.1296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管早期人们对b谷歌的元数据质量感到担忧(Geoffrey Nunberg在2009年8月31日出版的《高等教育编年史》上做了最好的总结),但图书馆员们已经开始欣赏b谷歌Books搜索数百万本书的能力,以及它作为语言和文化研究“大数据”来源的潜力。因此,2005年美国作家协会和五家出版商对b谷歌提起的诉讼,被许多图书管理员视为对一种不可替代资源的威胁。诉讼声称,b谷歌的扫描、维护搜索数据库以及向搜索者提供图书文本的“片段”侵犯了版权。一项拟议的和解在2011年失败,出版商在2012年放弃了诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transformative Use: An Update on the Google Books Case with Jonathan Band
In spite of early concerns about the quality of its metadata, best summarized by Geoffrey Nunberg in the August 31, 2009 issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education , librarians have come to appreciate Google Books for its power to search millions of books and its potential as a “big data” source for the study of language and culture. Thus, the suits filed against Google by the Authors Guild and five publishers in 2005, which were soon consolidated, were viewed by many librarians as a threat to an irreplaceable resource. The suits asserted that Google’s scanning, maintaining a database for searching, and offering searchers short “snippets” of the text of books infringed on copyright. A proposed settlement failed in 2011, and the publishers dropped their litigation in 2012.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Reconstruction of Mandible Defects in War Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Science of the Cover Letter: How to Apply for an Academic Librarian Job Orientation: Laying Out the Welcome Mat (or Not) for New Employees Upgraded and Grounded: Alexandria Library’s Experience in the ALA Pilot Program, Resilient Communities Charting a Course: Volume 66 of Virginia Libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1