{"title":"物业作为入口","authors":"E. Peñalver","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.667508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the central values of private ownership in liberal property thought is its freedom-guaranteeing function. The precise mechanism by which private property rights accomplish this guarantee, however, is frequently left unexplored. When theorists discuss the issue, they often identify property's liberty-securing quality with the power that property confers upon its owner to exit from society into the protective cocoon of his stuff. This mechanism of property as exit draws its strength from an implicit assumption that people are the sorts of beings that can withdraw from social relations into the cocoon of their property. But there are reasons to think that withdrawal would be very costly for most people. As a consequence, the power of property to facilitate exit may be substantially weaker than is often assumed. In addition, scholars' affinity for property's exit function has obscured the degree to which property works, not solely as a means of facilitating withdrawal, but also as a crucial mechanism for tying individuals into social groups.","PeriodicalId":47840,"journal":{"name":"Virginia Law Review","volume":"91 1","pages":"1889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Property as Entrance\",\"authors\":\"E. Peñalver\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.667508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the central values of private ownership in liberal property thought is its freedom-guaranteeing function. The precise mechanism by which private property rights accomplish this guarantee, however, is frequently left unexplored. When theorists discuss the issue, they often identify property's liberty-securing quality with the power that property confers upon its owner to exit from society into the protective cocoon of his stuff. This mechanism of property as exit draws its strength from an implicit assumption that people are the sorts of beings that can withdraw from social relations into the cocoon of their property. But there are reasons to think that withdrawal would be very costly for most people. As a consequence, the power of property to facilitate exit may be substantially weaker than is often assumed. In addition, scholars' affinity for property's exit function has obscured the degree to which property works, not solely as a means of facilitating withdrawal, but also as a crucial mechanism for tying individuals into social groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virginia Law Review\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"1889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virginia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.667508\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.667508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the central values of private ownership in liberal property thought is its freedom-guaranteeing function. The precise mechanism by which private property rights accomplish this guarantee, however, is frequently left unexplored. When theorists discuss the issue, they often identify property's liberty-securing quality with the power that property confers upon its owner to exit from society into the protective cocoon of his stuff. This mechanism of property as exit draws its strength from an implicit assumption that people are the sorts of beings that can withdraw from social relations into the cocoon of their property. But there are reasons to think that withdrawal would be very costly for most people. As a consequence, the power of property to facilitate exit may be substantially weaker than is often assumed. In addition, scholars' affinity for property's exit function has obscured the degree to which property works, not solely as a means of facilitating withdrawal, but also as a crucial mechanism for tying individuals into social groups.
期刊介绍:
The Virginia Law Review is a journal of general legal scholarship published by the students of the University of Virginia School of Law. The continuing objective of the Virginia Law Review is to publish a professional periodical devoted to legal and law-related issues that can be of use to judges, practitioners, teachers, legislators, students, and others interested in the law. First formally organized on April 23, 1913, the Virginia Law Review today remains one of the most respected and influential student legal periodicals in the country.