1918年奔萨河和乌拉尔河之间[修订:瓦西里琴科M.A.捷克斯洛伐克军团在伏尔加地区的斗争(1918年5月至11月)。萨拉托夫,2021]

S. V. Shebalkov
{"title":"1918年奔萨河和乌拉尔河之间[修订:瓦西里琴科M.A.捷克斯洛伐克军团在伏尔加地区的斗争(1918年5月至11月)。萨拉托夫,2021]","authors":"S. V. Shebalkov","doi":"10.21638/spbu24.2023.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review gives a detailed analysis of М. А. Vasilchenko’s monograph devoted to the problem of the revolt against the Soviet power by the units of the Volga (Penza) group of the Czechoslovak Corps in spring — autumn 1918. The theme of the Czechoslovak Corps’ revolt and its subsequent participation in the Russian Civil War usually causes ambiguous reception. The author of the monograph skillfully used a wide range of sources, including the materials in the Czech language. It enabled him to reconstruct the details of the military operations, identify the features of the everyday life of Czechoslovak legionnaires, as well as the ways of their interaction with anti-Bolshevik forces. In addition to the independent military operations of the Volga Group, the book describes the joint actions of the Czechoslovak forces and the People’s Army of Komuch. Some aspects presented in the monograph, for example, the procedure of the election of delegates to the first congress of the Czechoslovak Corps in Cheliabinsk, were studied in detail for the first time. The key feature of M. A. Vasilchenko’s research is the ambition to show the events through the perspective of the leadership of the Czechoslovak Corps, which determined the specificity of the final conclusions. The author justifiably notes that the Volga Group didn’t instigate the hostilities and points out that the Soviet government was also accountable for the unleashing of the revolt. The weaknesses of the research include the author’s insufficient coverage of the problem of Czechoslovak terror and the interaction of legionnaires with the local population of the Volga cities. Despite some omissions, the monograph makes a valuable contribution to the study of the Czechoslovak Corps’ revolt in the Middle Volga region.","PeriodicalId":53957,"journal":{"name":"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1918 between Penza and the Urals [Rev. on: Vasilchenko M. A. Czechoslovak Corps in the Struggle for the Volga Region (May — November 1918). Saratov, 2021]\",\"authors\":\"S. V. Shebalkov\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu24.2023.216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The review gives a detailed analysis of М. А. Vasilchenko’s monograph devoted to the problem of the revolt against the Soviet power by the units of the Volga (Penza) group of the Czechoslovak Corps in spring — autumn 1918. The theme of the Czechoslovak Corps’ revolt and its subsequent participation in the Russian Civil War usually causes ambiguous reception. The author of the monograph skillfully used a wide range of sources, including the materials in the Czech language. It enabled him to reconstruct the details of the military operations, identify the features of the everyday life of Czechoslovak legionnaires, as well as the ways of their interaction with anti-Bolshevik forces. In addition to the independent military operations of the Volga Group, the book describes the joint actions of the Czechoslovak forces and the People’s Army of Komuch. Some aspects presented in the monograph, for example, the procedure of the election of delegates to the first congress of the Czechoslovak Corps in Cheliabinsk, were studied in detail for the first time. The key feature of M. A. Vasilchenko’s research is the ambition to show the events through the perspective of the leadership of the Czechoslovak Corps, which determined the specificity of the final conclusions. The author justifiably notes that the Volga Group didn’t instigate the hostilities and points out that the Soviet government was also accountable for the unleashing of the revolt. The weaknesses of the research include the author’s insufficient coverage of the problem of Czechoslovak terror and the interaction of legionnaires with the local population of the Volga cities. Despite some omissions, the monograph makes a valuable contribution to the study of the Czechoslovak Corps’ revolt in the Middle Volga region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2023.216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2023.216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对М进行了详细的分析。А。瓦西里琴科的专著致力于1918年春秋捷克斯洛伐克军团伏尔加(奔萨)部队反抗苏维埃政权的问题。捷克斯洛伐克军团的起义及其随后参与俄国内战的主题通常会引起模棱两可的接受。该专著的作者巧妙地使用了广泛的资源,包括捷克语的材料。这使他能够重建军事行动的细节,识别捷克斯洛伐克军团士兵的日常生活特征,以及他们与反布尔什维克部队的互动方式。除了伏尔加集团的独立军事行动外,这本书还描述了捷克斯洛伐克部队和科穆奇人民军的联合行动。在专著中提出的一些方面,例如在车里雅宾斯克举行的捷克斯洛伐克军团第一届代表大会的选举程序,是第一次详细研究。M. A. Vasilchenko的研究的关键特征是通过捷克斯洛伐克军团领导层的视角来展示事件的野心,这决定了最终结论的特殊性。作者合理地指出,伏尔加集团并没有煽动敌对行动,并指出苏联政府也要为发动叛乱负责。这项研究的弱点包括作者对捷克斯洛伐克恐怖问题的报道不足,以及退伍军人与伏尔加河各城市当地居民的相互作用。尽管有一些遗漏,但该专著对研究捷克斯洛伐克军团在中伏尔加河地区的叛乱做出了宝贵的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1918 between Penza and the Urals [Rev. on: Vasilchenko M. A. Czechoslovak Corps in the Struggle for the Volga Region (May — November 1918). Saratov, 2021]
The review gives a detailed analysis of М. А. Vasilchenko’s monograph devoted to the problem of the revolt against the Soviet power by the units of the Volga (Penza) group of the Czechoslovak Corps in spring — autumn 1918. The theme of the Czechoslovak Corps’ revolt and its subsequent participation in the Russian Civil War usually causes ambiguous reception. The author of the monograph skillfully used a wide range of sources, including the materials in the Czech language. It enabled him to reconstruct the details of the military operations, identify the features of the everyday life of Czechoslovak legionnaires, as well as the ways of their interaction with anti-Bolshevik forces. In addition to the independent military operations of the Volga Group, the book describes the joint actions of the Czechoslovak forces and the People’s Army of Komuch. Some aspects presented in the monograph, for example, the procedure of the election of delegates to the first congress of the Czechoslovak Corps in Cheliabinsk, were studied in detail for the first time. The key feature of M. A. Vasilchenko’s research is the ambition to show the events through the perspective of the leadership of the Czechoslovak Corps, which determined the specificity of the final conclusions. The author justifiably notes that the Volga Group didn’t instigate the hostilities and points out that the Soviet government was also accountable for the unleashing of the revolt. The weaknesses of the research include the author’s insufficient coverage of the problem of Czechoslovak terror and the interaction of legionnaires with the local population of the Volga cities. Despite some omissions, the monograph makes a valuable contribution to the study of the Czechoslovak Corps’ revolt in the Middle Volga region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Departmental Resettlements of Special Settlers during the Great Patriotic War: Mechanism of Realization and Significance (Based on the Materials of North-Western Siberia) Svalbard in the Strategy of the Great Powers During the Second World War (1939– 1945) Soviet Experience in Managing Evacuation Cargoes in 1941–1942: From Over-centralization to Local Initiative The Amur Expedition and the Committee for the Settlement of the Far East in the Agenda of the Russian Council of Ministers under P. A. Stolypin ‘“Sovexportfilm” as an Actor of Ideological Influence during the Cold War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1