司法划界与更广泛的文化:以政治与娱乐为例

R. Wright
{"title":"司法划界与更广泛的文化:以政治与娱乐为例","authors":"R. Wright","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2019965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article puts in a broader legal and cultural context and then critically evaluates Justice Scalia’s and other legal figures' remarkably broad and systematic reluctance to distinguish, for Free Speech purposes, in appropriate cases, between politics and entertainment, or more precisely, political speech and entertainment speech.","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"49 1","pages":"341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Line-Drawing and the Broader Culture: The Case of Politics and Entertainment\",\"authors\":\"R. Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2019965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article puts in a broader legal and cultural context and then critically evaluates Justice Scalia’s and other legal figures' remarkably broad and systematic reluctance to distinguish, for Free Speech purposes, in appropriate cases, between politics and entertainment, or more precisely, political speech and entertainment speech.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The San Diego law review\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The San Diego law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2019965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The San Diego law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2019965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将其置于一个更广泛的法律和文化背景中,然后批判性地评估斯卡利亚大法官和其他法律人物在适当的情况下,出于言论自由的目的,对政治和娱乐,或者更准确地说,政治言论和娱乐言论进行区分的明显广泛和系统性的不情愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial Line-Drawing and the Broader Culture: The Case of Politics and Entertainment
This article puts in a broader legal and cultural context and then critically evaluates Justice Scalia’s and other legal figures' remarkably broad and systematic reluctance to distinguish, for Free Speech purposes, in appropriate cases, between politics and entertainment, or more precisely, political speech and entertainment speech.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to 'How Foot Voting Enhances Political Freedom' Is There Hope for Change? The Evolution of Conceptions of 'Good' Corporate Governance Extending Miranda: Prohibition on Police Lies Regarding the Incriminating Evidence The Vindication of Good Over Evil: “Futile” Self-Defense The Case for Varying Standards of Proof
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1