红细胞沉降率、c反应蛋白和降钙素原在脊柱感染和脊髓损伤患者中的作用

J. A. Buensalido, M. Reyes
{"title":"红细胞沉降率、c反应蛋白和降钙素原在脊柱感染和脊髓损伤患者中的作用","authors":"J. A. Buensalido, M. Reyes","doi":"10.2174/1874279301509010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most widely used inflammatory markers are erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). A review of the literature was done on their application in spinal infections and spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. ESR, CRP and PCT as markers of infection have their uses in various but specific medical conditions. SCI patients are unique because they are in a chronic state of inflammation. In these patients, CRP >50 mg/L may support the diagnosis of true UTI. In those with chronic infections of the spine/vertebrae, an ESR of >20-30 mm/h appears superior to an elevated CRP for diagnosis, although it is still preferred to do both tests. Serum PCT of >0.4 ng/mL was reported to be highly specific in diagnosing acute osteomyelitis, but evidence was very limited. No study on PCT for chronic osteomyelitis was found. In post-spine surgery patients, CRP is more useful than ESR, while PCT is superior to CRP in detection of post-operative infections because the former does not rise too high, even after major neurosurgery. PCT of >0.5 ng/mL is reasonable evidence to start antibiotics and further investigation, while levels <0.1 ng/mL suggest absence of infection. CRP is inferior to PCT in diagnosing post-spine surgery infections, but it may be used when cost is an issue or when PCT is unavailable. This is the first literature review of the most widely used biomarkers, including PCT, and their application in the diagnosis of infections of the spine and infections in SCI patients.","PeriodicalId":88330,"journal":{"name":"The open infectious diseases journal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in Infections of the Spine and Infections in Spinal Cord Injury Patients\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Buensalido, M. Reyes\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874279301509010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most widely used inflammatory markers are erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). A review of the literature was done on their application in spinal infections and spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. ESR, CRP and PCT as markers of infection have their uses in various but specific medical conditions. SCI patients are unique because they are in a chronic state of inflammation. In these patients, CRP >50 mg/L may support the diagnosis of true UTI. In those with chronic infections of the spine/vertebrae, an ESR of >20-30 mm/h appears superior to an elevated CRP for diagnosis, although it is still preferred to do both tests. Serum PCT of >0.4 ng/mL was reported to be highly specific in diagnosing acute osteomyelitis, but evidence was very limited. No study on PCT for chronic osteomyelitis was found. In post-spine surgery patients, CRP is more useful than ESR, while PCT is superior to CRP in detection of post-operative infections because the former does not rise too high, even after major neurosurgery. PCT of >0.5 ng/mL is reasonable evidence to start antibiotics and further investigation, while levels <0.1 ng/mL suggest absence of infection. CRP is inferior to PCT in diagnosing post-spine surgery infections, but it may be used when cost is an issue or when PCT is unavailable. This is the first literature review of the most widely used biomarkers, including PCT, and their application in the diagnosis of infections of the spine and infections in SCI patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open infectious diseases journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open infectious diseases journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874279301509010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open infectious diseases journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874279301509010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最广泛使用的炎症标志物是红细胞沉降率(ESR)、c反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)。本文就其在脊髓感染和脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中的应用作一综述。ESR、CRP和PCT作为感染标志物在各种特殊的医疗条件下有其用途。脊髓损伤患者是独特的,因为他们处于慢性炎症状态。在这些患者中,CRP低于50 mg/L可能支持真正UTI的诊断。对于那些脊柱/椎体慢性感染的患者,ESR为20-30 mm/h比CRP升高更有利于诊断,尽管两种检测仍然更可取。据报道,血清PCT为>.4 ng/mL对诊断急性骨髓炎具有高度特异性,但证据非常有限。未见PCT治疗慢性骨髓炎的研究。在脊柱术后患者中,CRP比ESR更有用,而PCT在检测术后感染方面优于CRP,因为PCT即使在大神经手术后也不会升高太高。PCT水平为>0.5 ng/mL是开始使用抗生素和进一步调查的合理证据,而水平<0.1 ng/mL提示没有感染。在诊断脊柱手术后感染方面,CRP不如PCT,但当成本是一个问题或PCT不可用时,可以使用CRP。本文首次对包括PCT在内的应用最广泛的生物标志物及其在脊柱感染和脊髓损伤患者感染诊断中的应用进行文献综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in Infections of the Spine and Infections in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
The most widely used inflammatory markers are erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). A review of the literature was done on their application in spinal infections and spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. ESR, CRP and PCT as markers of infection have their uses in various but specific medical conditions. SCI patients are unique because they are in a chronic state of inflammation. In these patients, CRP >50 mg/L may support the diagnosis of true UTI. In those with chronic infections of the spine/vertebrae, an ESR of >20-30 mm/h appears superior to an elevated CRP for diagnosis, although it is still preferred to do both tests. Serum PCT of >0.4 ng/mL was reported to be highly specific in diagnosing acute osteomyelitis, but evidence was very limited. No study on PCT for chronic osteomyelitis was found. In post-spine surgery patients, CRP is more useful than ESR, while PCT is superior to CRP in detection of post-operative infections because the former does not rise too high, even after major neurosurgery. PCT of >0.5 ng/mL is reasonable evidence to start antibiotics and further investigation, while levels <0.1 ng/mL suggest absence of infection. CRP is inferior to PCT in diagnosing post-spine surgery infections, but it may be used when cost is an issue or when PCT is unavailable. This is the first literature review of the most widely used biomarkers, including PCT, and their application in the diagnosis of infections of the spine and infections in SCI patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tuberculin Skin Test Reactivity among Health Care Workers in the Abia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba South-east Nigeria The Effect of Combinations of Antibiotics and Natural Products on the Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa The Outbreak of Highly Contagious Conjunctivitis (Pink Eye) in Major Cities of Pakistan Synthesis of Health Policies in the Fight against Malaria in Two Countries at Different Stages of Intervention in the Progress Towards Malaria Elimination, using Data from Surveys and Literature Impact of Pregnancy on the Prognosis of COVID-19 in Women Hospitalized at the National Reference Center for Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2 in a Resources Limited Country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1