老年社区居民住家康复与以中心为基础的康复:经济评价的随机试验

T. Comans, S. Brauer, T. Haines
{"title":"老年社区居民住家康复与以中心为基础的康复:经济评价的随机试验","authors":"T. Comans, S. Brauer, T. Haines","doi":"10.2174/1874827900801010062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Community rehabilitation services for older adults aim to address factors that lead to physical de- cline and falls and return people to their normal activities in the community. While community rehabilitation has been proven effective in reducing falls in the elderly, previous studies have not specified whether delivering services at home or in a centre-based format is the more appropriate method of service delivery. Aim: This study aims to compare a centre-based group program with a home-based program. The purpose of this study is to identify the most clinically effective way of delivering community rehabilitation services to older fallers and determine which service delivery setting is more economically efficient. Methods/Design: This paper describes the study design and methods of a randomised clinical trial. One group of partici- pants will receive a centre-based community rehabilitation service, the other group a domiciliary (home-based) commu- nity rehabilitation service of near identical content. Participants in this study are those clients over 60 years of age referred to a community rehabilitation service. Patients referred to this service typically have had recent falls, poor or declining mobility, functional dependency, cognitive decline, and / or physical deconditioning. Clinical effectiveness will be primarily determined by comparison of health-related quality of life and rates of accidental falls. Secondary outcomes include the levels of participation in functional activities, and physical capacity between the two groups. Economic efficiency will be determined through conduct of a cost-benefit analysis. Discussion: Results from this study will guide clinicians and policy makers to identify the more effective and efficient falls prevention community rehabilitation program service delivery model for older adults living in the community. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: ACTRN12605000056695.","PeriodicalId":89035,"journal":{"name":"The open geriatric medicine journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"62-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domiciliary vs Centre-Based Rehabilitation of Older Community Dwellers: Randomised Trial with Economic Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"T. Comans, S. Brauer, T. Haines\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874827900801010062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Community rehabilitation services for older adults aim to address factors that lead to physical de- cline and falls and return people to their normal activities in the community. While community rehabilitation has been proven effective in reducing falls in the elderly, previous studies have not specified whether delivering services at home or in a centre-based format is the more appropriate method of service delivery. Aim: This study aims to compare a centre-based group program with a home-based program. The purpose of this study is to identify the most clinically effective way of delivering community rehabilitation services to older fallers and determine which service delivery setting is more economically efficient. Methods/Design: This paper describes the study design and methods of a randomised clinical trial. One group of partici- pants will receive a centre-based community rehabilitation service, the other group a domiciliary (home-based) commu- nity rehabilitation service of near identical content. Participants in this study are those clients over 60 years of age referred to a community rehabilitation service. Patients referred to this service typically have had recent falls, poor or declining mobility, functional dependency, cognitive decline, and / or physical deconditioning. Clinical effectiveness will be primarily determined by comparison of health-related quality of life and rates of accidental falls. Secondary outcomes include the levels of participation in functional activities, and physical capacity between the two groups. Economic efficiency will be determined through conduct of a cost-benefit analysis. Discussion: Results from this study will guide clinicians and policy makers to identify the more effective and efficient falls prevention community rehabilitation program service delivery model for older adults living in the community. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: ACTRN12605000056695.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open geriatric medicine journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"62-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open geriatric medicine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874827900801010062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open geriatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874827900801010062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:老年人社区康复服务旨在解决导致身体衰退和跌倒的因素,使人们恢复正常的社区活动。虽然社区康复已被证明在减少老年人跌倒方面是有效的,但以前的研究并没有具体说明在家中提供服务还是以中心为基础的形式提供服务是更合适的服务提供方法。目的:本研究旨在比较以中心为基础的团体课程与以家庭为基础的课程。本研究的目的是确定临床最有效的方式提供社区康复服务的老年跌倒,并确定哪种服务提供设置更经济有效。方法/设计:本文描述了一项随机临床试验的研究设计和方法。一组参与者将接受以中心为基础的社区康复服务,另一组将接受内容几乎相同的居家社区康复服务。本研究的参与者是那些60岁以上转介到社区康复服务的客户。该服务的患者通常有近期跌倒、活动能力差或下降、功能依赖、认知能力下降和/或身体状况下降。临床效果将主要通过与健康相关的生活质量和意外跌倒率的比较来确定。次要结果包括两组患者参与功能性活动的水平和身体能力。经济效率将通过进行成本效益分析来确定。讨论:本研究的结果将指导临床医生和政策制定者为生活在社区中的老年人确定更有效和高效的预防跌倒社区康复项目服务交付模式。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册号:ACTRN12605000056695。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Domiciliary vs Centre-Based Rehabilitation of Older Community Dwellers: Randomised Trial with Economic Evaluation
Background: Community rehabilitation services for older adults aim to address factors that lead to physical de- cline and falls and return people to their normal activities in the community. While community rehabilitation has been proven effective in reducing falls in the elderly, previous studies have not specified whether delivering services at home or in a centre-based format is the more appropriate method of service delivery. Aim: This study aims to compare a centre-based group program with a home-based program. The purpose of this study is to identify the most clinically effective way of delivering community rehabilitation services to older fallers and determine which service delivery setting is more economically efficient. Methods/Design: This paper describes the study design and methods of a randomised clinical trial. One group of partici- pants will receive a centre-based community rehabilitation service, the other group a domiciliary (home-based) commu- nity rehabilitation service of near identical content. Participants in this study are those clients over 60 years of age referred to a community rehabilitation service. Patients referred to this service typically have had recent falls, poor or declining mobility, functional dependency, cognitive decline, and / or physical deconditioning. Clinical effectiveness will be primarily determined by comparison of health-related quality of life and rates of accidental falls. Secondary outcomes include the levels of participation in functional activities, and physical capacity between the two groups. Economic efficiency will be determined through conduct of a cost-benefit analysis. Discussion: Results from this study will guide clinicians and policy makers to identify the more effective and efficient falls prevention community rehabilitation program service delivery model for older adults living in the community. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: ACTRN12605000056695.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of β-Amyloid Peptide -Binding Proteins in Microglial Cell Testing Construct Validity of the 13-Item Sense of Coherence Scale in a Sample of Older People Ribosomal Genes Activity in Aged Down Syndrome Subjects Effect of Aging on Auto-Antibodies to Wounded Tissues~!2010-03-17~!2010-04-30~!2010-06-17~! Cognitive Dimensions in Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Normal Elderly: Developing a Common Metric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1