入职前询问:药检、酒精筛查、体检、诚信测试、基因筛查——它们有歧视吗?实证研究。

D. Stone
{"title":"入职前询问:药检、酒精筛查、体检、诚信测试、基因筛查——它们有歧视吗?实证研究。","authors":"D. Stone","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1345949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do employers decide who to hire for their workplace? Are there tests that are administered to screen out those job applicants that do not fit the employer's for good, honest, hard-working, never-complaining workers? Do employers use screening devices to discriminate against persons with disabilities? What kinds of screening tests do employers use to assist in hiring workers for their company? Fifty-four of the Fortune 500 companies from across the country were surveyed to elicit their opinions on these and other questions relating to pre-employment inquiries. The responses of these companies are tabulated and discussed and serve as a backdrop in this Article which analyzes pre-employment screening practices. Also, a look into the not too distant future where honesty and integrity testing are on the rise and genetics testing of job applicants is heading into the employment arena. Court cases in the area of pre-employment inquiries are analyzed and federal statutes are reviewed and discussed to demonstrate the prevalence of certain forms of employment tests being administered.The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 1988 that 13,415,000 people had a work disability, comprising 8.6% of the 16 to 64 year old population. The number of disabled persons participating in the labor force was 31.6%, however, only 18.2% of the 13.4 million people with a work disability were employed full time. The unemployment rate for those persons with a work disability was much greater than for those with no work disability, 14.2% as compared to 5.8%. Persons with a work disability earned less than half the income of those persons with no disability, $6,319 median annual income as compared to $14,354 of those persons with no work disability.These statistics serve as a reminder that many disabled people continue to face obstacles in gaining access into the employment arena. This Article will reveal how disabled persons are at greater risk when employers increase their screening and testing arsenal in the job selection area.","PeriodicalId":80399,"journal":{"name":"Akron law review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-employment inquiries: drug testing, alcohol screening, physical exams, honesty testing, genetics screening--do they discriminate? An empirical study.\",\"authors\":\"D. Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1345949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do employers decide who to hire for their workplace? Are there tests that are administered to screen out those job applicants that do not fit the employer's for good, honest, hard-working, never-complaining workers? Do employers use screening devices to discriminate against persons with disabilities? What kinds of screening tests do employers use to assist in hiring workers for their company? Fifty-four of the Fortune 500 companies from across the country were surveyed to elicit their opinions on these and other questions relating to pre-employment inquiries. The responses of these companies are tabulated and discussed and serve as a backdrop in this Article which analyzes pre-employment screening practices. Also, a look into the not too distant future where honesty and integrity testing are on the rise and genetics testing of job applicants is heading into the employment arena. Court cases in the area of pre-employment inquiries are analyzed and federal statutes are reviewed and discussed to demonstrate the prevalence of certain forms of employment tests being administered.The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 1988 that 13,415,000 people had a work disability, comprising 8.6% of the 16 to 64 year old population. The number of disabled persons participating in the labor force was 31.6%, however, only 18.2% of the 13.4 million people with a work disability were employed full time. The unemployment rate for those persons with a work disability was much greater than for those with no work disability, 14.2% as compared to 5.8%. Persons with a work disability earned less than half the income of those persons with no disability, $6,319 median annual income as compared to $14,354 of those persons with no work disability.These statistics serve as a reminder that many disabled people continue to face obstacles in gaining access into the employment arena. This Article will reveal how disabled persons are at greater risk when employers increase their screening and testing arsenal in the job selection area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Akron law review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Akron law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1345949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akron law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1345949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

雇主如何决定雇佣谁?有没有一些测试是用来筛选那些不符合雇主对优秀、诚实、勤奋、从不抱怨的员工的要求的求职者呢?雇主是否使用筛选装置歧视残疾人士?雇主使用哪些筛选测试来帮助他们的公司雇佣工人?来自全国各地的54家财富500强公司接受了调查,以征求他们对这些问题和其他与就业前询问有关的问题的意见。这些公司的回应被制表和讨论,并作为背景在这篇文章,分析就业前的筛选做法。此外,在不久的将来,诚实和正直测试将越来越多,求职者的基因测试也将进入就业领域。对就业前调查领域的法庭案件进行了分析,并审查和讨论了联邦法规,以表明正在实施的某些形式的就业测试的普遍性。美国人口普查局1988年的报告显示,13,415,000人患有工作残疾,占16至64岁人口的8.6%。残疾人参加劳动力的比例为31.6%,但在1340万工作残疾人员中,只有18.2%的人全职就业。有工作残疾人士的失业率远高于无工作残疾人士,前者为14.2%,后者为5.8%。有工作残疾人士的收入不到无残疾人士的一半,即年收入中位数为6,319美元,而无工作残疾人士的年收入中位数为14,354美元。这些统计数字提醒我们,许多残疾人在进入就业领域方面仍然面临障碍。这篇文章将揭示当雇主在工作选择领域增加他们的筛选和测试库时,残疾人面临更大的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-employment inquiries: drug testing, alcohol screening, physical exams, honesty testing, genetics screening--do they discriminate? An empirical study.
How do employers decide who to hire for their workplace? Are there tests that are administered to screen out those job applicants that do not fit the employer's for good, honest, hard-working, never-complaining workers? Do employers use screening devices to discriminate against persons with disabilities? What kinds of screening tests do employers use to assist in hiring workers for their company? Fifty-four of the Fortune 500 companies from across the country were surveyed to elicit their opinions on these and other questions relating to pre-employment inquiries. The responses of these companies are tabulated and discussed and serve as a backdrop in this Article which analyzes pre-employment screening practices. Also, a look into the not too distant future where honesty and integrity testing are on the rise and genetics testing of job applicants is heading into the employment arena. Court cases in the area of pre-employment inquiries are analyzed and federal statutes are reviewed and discussed to demonstrate the prevalence of certain forms of employment tests being administered.The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 1988 that 13,415,000 people had a work disability, comprising 8.6% of the 16 to 64 year old population. The number of disabled persons participating in the labor force was 31.6%, however, only 18.2% of the 13.4 million people with a work disability were employed full time. The unemployment rate for those persons with a work disability was much greater than for those with no work disability, 14.2% as compared to 5.8%. Persons with a work disability earned less than half the income of those persons with no disability, $6,319 median annual income as compared to $14,354 of those persons with no work disability.These statistics serve as a reminder that many disabled people continue to face obstacles in gaining access into the employment arena. This Article will reveal how disabled persons are at greater risk when employers increase their screening and testing arsenal in the job selection area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk Taking and Rights Balancing in Intellectual Property Law On Individual Participation within Mass Litigation: The Case of the Fairness Hearing Dissecting the ABA Texas Capital Punishment Assessment Report of 2013: Death and Texas, a Surprising Improvement The (Re)newed Barrier to Access to Medication: Data Exclusivity Physical Attractiveness and Femininity: Helpful or Hurtful for Female Attorneys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1