质性研究的品质:效度、信度与普遍性的案例

Azham Md. Ali, H. Yusof
{"title":"质性研究的品质:效度、信度与普遍性的案例","authors":"Azham Md. Ali, H. Yusof","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V5I1.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concern over the subject of quality judgement of qualitative research has led to the emergenceof several varied positions. Whichever labels used in describing the positions, each has adistinctive character. To attempt to an understanding of the meaning of the quality criteria ofvalidity, reliability and generalizability in qualitative research, this paper provides a review ofrelevant literature of recent years. To check on the extent of their reporting in research papers, atotal of 15 accounting research recently published in top-ranked accounting journals have beenselected. Except for one paper, the rest has failed to provide detailed discussion on the validity,reliability and generalizability of their research. But this would not necessarily mean that theconcerned researchers have disregarded the aspects of validity, reliability and generalizabilityduring the conduct of their research. Perhaps the only way to find out the truth is by asking theresearchers themselves the relevant questions. Copyright © www.iiste.org","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"5 1","pages":"25-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"195","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality in Qualitative Studies: The Case of Validity, Reliability and Generalizability\",\"authors\":\"Azham Md. Ali, H. Yusof\",\"doi\":\"10.22164/ISEA.V5I1.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concern over the subject of quality judgement of qualitative research has led to the emergenceof several varied positions. Whichever labels used in describing the positions, each has adistinctive character. To attempt to an understanding of the meaning of the quality criteria ofvalidity, reliability and generalizability in qualitative research, this paper provides a review ofrelevant literature of recent years. To check on the extent of their reporting in research papers, atotal of 15 accounting research recently published in top-ranked accounting journals have beenselected. Except for one paper, the rest has failed to provide detailed discussion on the validity,reliability and generalizability of their research. But this would not necessarily mean that theconcerned researchers have disregarded the aspects of validity, reliability and generalizabilityduring the conduct of their research. Perhaps the only way to find out the truth is by asking theresearchers themselves the relevant questions. Copyright © www.iiste.org\",\"PeriodicalId\":31316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"25-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"195\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V5I1.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V5I1.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 195

摘要

对质性研究质量判断问题的关注导致了几种不同立场的出现。无论用哪一种标签来描述这些位置,每一种都有其独特的特征。为了理解效度、信度和概括性等质量标准在定性研究中的意义,本文对近年来的相关文献进行了综述。为了检查他们在研究论文中的报告程度,我们选择了最近在顶级会计期刊上发表的15项会计研究。除了一篇论文外,其余的都没有对其研究的效度、信度和概括性进行详细的讨论。但这并不一定意味着相关研究人员在研究过程中忽视了有效性、可靠性和概括性。也许找出真相的唯一方法就是向研究人员自己提出相关的问题。Â版权所有©www.iiste.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality in Qualitative Studies: The Case of Validity, Reliability and Generalizability
The concern over the subject of quality judgement of qualitative research has led to the emergenceof several varied positions. Whichever labels used in describing the positions, each has adistinctive character. To attempt to an understanding of the meaning of the quality criteria ofvalidity, reliability and generalizability in qualitative research, this paper provides a review ofrelevant literature of recent years. To check on the extent of their reporting in research papers, atotal of 15 accounting research recently published in top-ranked accounting journals have beenselected. Except for one paper, the rest has failed to provide detailed discussion on the validity,reliability and generalizability of their research. But this would not necessarily mean that theconcerned researchers have disregarded the aspects of validity, reliability and generalizabilityduring the conduct of their research. Perhaps the only way to find out the truth is by asking theresearchers themselves the relevant questions. Copyright © www.iiste.org
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Financial Reporting Timeliness in Emerging Market: Does Audit Committee Chair Matter? Community in Credit Unions: Has banking regulationimpaired CSR in Australian Customer Owned Banks? Initial Evidence on the Association between Local Government Fiscal Distress and Environmental Protection Programs An International Comparison of Corporate Social Responsibility Social Compliance Accounting A Book Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1