共产党与法律:中华人民共和国执政党与其他法律制度的正式与非正式联系概述

Manuél E. Delmestro
{"title":"共产党与法律:中华人民共和国执政党与其他法律制度的正式与非正式联系概述","authors":"Manuél E. Delmestro","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1405003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper, roughly belonging to the comparative public law field, investigates the concrete links, formal, quasi-formal and substantial interactions, functional and organic compenetrations occurring amongst legal and political actors in the Chinese Party-State System.The legal position enjoyed by the ubiquitous Communist Party within the political-legal system of the PRC. A description is provided on how the status of the Party and the Socialist System - the protecting and enveloping skull within which the Party-brain operates - has been modified and re-engineered, and sometimes formalized throughout a broad set of norms (constitutions, political documents, system-laws, ordinary laws, administrative regulations, case law) since the establishment of the PRC in 1949 and particularly during the Deng, Jiang and Hu eras.The political-legal means used by the Party to operate as an organism innervating its parent-body i.e. the PRC institutional system. Attention is focused both on the statutory well-known organs that constitute the Party apparatus and on the less known and often neglected chains of transmission and ad hoc organisms a structures (Leading Small Groups, organic committees, Party groups, the nomenklatura etc) operating as traits d’union between Party, State (People’s assemblies, government/executive, military & security forces, judiciary), civil society and businesses, and carrying the Party’s will and impulse to the peripheral layers of the System.Party’s Legal Creativity. In discussing the greater Rule of Law topic, the question of how laws themselves are created and by whom is often forgotten. While looking at this issue and considering that in the CPC-ruled Socialist Legal System State rules are created according to CPC rule development, the question then becomes whether a new legal category is needed to conceptualize CPC regulations. The CPC has a complex corpus of internal rules, and the production of party norms and regulations comes through the CPC Interim Regulations on the Procedure for Establishing Internal Party Regulations, an internal legislation law established in 1990, about 10 years prior to the national Legislation Law. As the normative framework for Inner Party Rule of Law existed prior to State Rule of Law, there is indeed a need of conceptualization of CPC rules, and a possible complement to the notion of binding ‘normative’ rules of State would be to consider their alter ego, the soft CPC rules, as ‘nomopoietic’, or rule-creating rules for the State.","PeriodicalId":82862,"journal":{"name":"Suffolk University law review","volume":"43 1","pages":"681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Communist Party & the Law: An Outline of Formal and Less Formal Linkages between the Ruling Party and the Other Legal Institutions in the People's Republic of China\",\"authors\":\"Manuél E. Delmestro\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1405003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper, roughly belonging to the comparative public law field, investigates the concrete links, formal, quasi-formal and substantial interactions, functional and organic compenetrations occurring amongst legal and political actors in the Chinese Party-State System.The legal position enjoyed by the ubiquitous Communist Party within the political-legal system of the PRC. A description is provided on how the status of the Party and the Socialist System - the protecting and enveloping skull within which the Party-brain operates - has been modified and re-engineered, and sometimes formalized throughout a broad set of norms (constitutions, political documents, system-laws, ordinary laws, administrative regulations, case law) since the establishment of the PRC in 1949 and particularly during the Deng, Jiang and Hu eras.The political-legal means used by the Party to operate as an organism innervating its parent-body i.e. the PRC institutional system. Attention is focused both on the statutory well-known organs that constitute the Party apparatus and on the less known and often neglected chains of transmission and ad hoc organisms a structures (Leading Small Groups, organic committees, Party groups, the nomenklatura etc) operating as traits d’union between Party, State (People’s assemblies, government/executive, military & security forces, judiciary), civil society and businesses, and carrying the Party’s will and impulse to the peripheral layers of the System.Party’s Legal Creativity. In discussing the greater Rule of Law topic, the question of how laws themselves are created and by whom is often forgotten. While looking at this issue and considering that in the CPC-ruled Socialist Legal System State rules are created according to CPC rule development, the question then becomes whether a new legal category is needed to conceptualize CPC regulations. The CPC has a complex corpus of internal rules, and the production of party norms and regulations comes through the CPC Interim Regulations on the Procedure for Establishing Internal Party Regulations, an internal legislation law established in 1990, about 10 years prior to the national Legislation Law. As the normative framework for Inner Party Rule of Law existed prior to State Rule of Law, there is indeed a need of conceptualization of CPC rules, and a possible complement to the notion of binding ‘normative’ rules of State would be to consider their alter ego, the soft CPC rules, as ‘nomopoietic’, or rule-creating rules for the State.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suffolk University law review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suffolk University law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1405003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suffolk University law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1405003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文大致属于比较公法领域,研究中国党国体制中法律和政治行为体之间的具体联系、正式的、准正式的和实质性的相互作用、功能的和有机的补偿。无处不在的共产党在中华人民共和国政法体系中享有的法律地位。本文描述了自1949年中华人民共和国成立以来,特别是在邓、江、胡时代,党和社会主义制度的地位——保护和包裹着党的大脑运作的头骨——是如何被修改和重新设计的,有时是如何通过一套广泛的规范(宪法、政治文件、制度法律、普通法、行政法规、判例法)来正式确定的。党作为支配其母体即中华人民共和国制度体系的有机体而运作的政治-法律手段。人们的注意力既集中在构成党的机构的法定知名机构上,也集中在不太为人所知和经常被忽视的传播链上,以及作为党、国家(人民议会、政府/行政部门、军事和安全部队、司法部门)、民间社会和企业之间的联盟特征而运作的特设组织和结构(领导小组、有机委员会、党组、命名机构等)上。把党的意志和冲动传递到体制的外围。党的法律创造力。在讨论更广泛的法治话题时,法律本身是如何制定的以及由谁制定的问题往往被遗忘。考虑到这个问题,并考虑到在中国共产党统治的社会主义法律体系中,国家规则是根据中国共产党的规则发展而制定的,那么问题就变成了是否需要一个新的法律类别来概念化中国共产党的法规。中国共产党拥有复杂的内部规则体系,党内规范和规章的产生是通过1990年制定的《中国共产党党内规章制定程序暂行条例》,这是一部内部立法法,比国家立法法早了大约10年。由于党内法治的规范框架先于国家法治而存在,因此确实需要对中共规则进行概念化,而对具有约束力的国家“规范性”规则概念的可能补充将是考虑它们的另一个自我,即中共软规则,作为国家的“规范”或规则创造规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Communist Party & the Law: An Outline of Formal and Less Formal Linkages between the Ruling Party and the Other Legal Institutions in the People's Republic of China
This paper, roughly belonging to the comparative public law field, investigates the concrete links, formal, quasi-formal and substantial interactions, functional and organic compenetrations occurring amongst legal and political actors in the Chinese Party-State System.The legal position enjoyed by the ubiquitous Communist Party within the political-legal system of the PRC. A description is provided on how the status of the Party and the Socialist System - the protecting and enveloping skull within which the Party-brain operates - has been modified and re-engineered, and sometimes formalized throughout a broad set of norms (constitutions, political documents, system-laws, ordinary laws, administrative regulations, case law) since the establishment of the PRC in 1949 and particularly during the Deng, Jiang and Hu eras.The political-legal means used by the Party to operate as an organism innervating its parent-body i.e. the PRC institutional system. Attention is focused both on the statutory well-known organs that constitute the Party apparatus and on the less known and often neglected chains of transmission and ad hoc organisms a structures (Leading Small Groups, organic committees, Party groups, the nomenklatura etc) operating as traits d’union between Party, State (People’s assemblies, government/executive, military & security forces, judiciary), civil society and businesses, and carrying the Party’s will and impulse to the peripheral layers of the System.Party’s Legal Creativity. In discussing the greater Rule of Law topic, the question of how laws themselves are created and by whom is often forgotten. While looking at this issue and considering that in the CPC-ruled Socialist Legal System State rules are created according to CPC rule development, the question then becomes whether a new legal category is needed to conceptualize CPC regulations. The CPC has a complex corpus of internal rules, and the production of party norms and regulations comes through the CPC Interim Regulations on the Procedure for Establishing Internal Party Regulations, an internal legislation law established in 1990, about 10 years prior to the national Legislation Law. As the normative framework for Inner Party Rule of Law existed prior to State Rule of Law, there is indeed a need of conceptualization of CPC rules, and a possible complement to the notion of binding ‘normative’ rules of State would be to consider their alter ego, the soft CPC rules, as ‘nomopoietic’, or rule-creating rules for the State.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Planning for Law as a Career and an Enterprise Making Law with Lawsuits: Understanding Judicial Review in Campaign Finance Policy Promise and Private Law The Communist Party & the Law: An Outline of Formal and Less Formal Linkages between the Ruling Party and the Other Legal Institutions in the People's Republic of China Bearing False Witness: Perjured Affidavits and the Fourth Amendment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1