石棉公地的悲剧

IF 2.4 2区社会学 Q1 LAW Virginia Law Review Pub Date : 2002-12-01 DOI:10.2307/1074008

Francis E. McGovern

{"title":"石棉公地的悲剧","authors":"Francis E. McGovern","doi":"10.2307/1074008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRO DU CTIO N 1721 I. Is THERE AN ASBESTOS \"COMMONS\" PROBLEM? 1724 II. WHAT ARE THE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE CURRENT ASBESTOS LITIGATION LANDSCAPE? 1726 A. Econom ic Incentives 1728 1. The Traditional Model 1729 2. The Mass Tort Model (Single Defendant) 1731 3. The Mass Tort Model (Multiple Defendants) 1735 B. Substantive and Procedural Law . 1738 C. Litigation Practice 1739 D . O utlier Jurisdictions 1740 E. Undeniable Liability 1741 F. All of the Above, Plus 1741 III. THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANTS TO COOPERATE .... 1741 IV. THE FAILURE OF THE JUDICIARY TO COOPERATE 1745 V. THE FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS TO COOPERATE 1747 VI. WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS? 1750 A . L egislation 1751 B. Case Management/Substantive Law/Procedures 1752 C. C lass A ction 1753 D. Bankruptcy 1754 CONCLUSION 1756","PeriodicalId":47840,"journal":{"name":"Virginia Law Review","volume":"88 1","pages":"1721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1074008","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tragedy of the Asbestos Commons\",\"authors\":\"Francis E. McGovern\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1074008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRO DU CTIO N 1721 I. Is THERE AN ASBESTOS \\\"COMMONS\\\" PROBLEM? 1724 II. WHAT ARE THE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE CURRENT ASBESTOS LITIGATION LANDSCAPE? 1726 A. Econom ic Incentives 1728 1. The Traditional Model 1729 2. The Mass Tort Model (Single Defendant) 1731 3. The Mass Tort Model (Multiple Defendants) 1735 B. Substantive and Procedural Law . 1738 C. Litigation Practice 1739 D . O utlier Jurisdictions 1740 E. Undeniable Liability 1741 F. All of the Above, Plus 1741 III. THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANTS TO COOPERATE .... 1741 IV. THE FAILURE OF THE JUDICIARY TO COOPERATE 1745 V. THE FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS TO COOPERATE 1747 VI. WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS? 1750 A . L egislation 1751 B. Case Management/Substantive Law/Procedures 1752 C. C lass A ction 1753 D. Bankruptcy 1754 CONCLUSION 1756\",\"PeriodicalId\":47840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virginia Law Review\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"1721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1074008\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virginia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1074008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1074008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

是否存在石棉“公地”问题?1724二世。对当前石棉诉讼形势有何解释?1726 A。1.经济激励传统模型1729大规模侵权模式(单一被告)1731大规模侵权模式(多被告)1735 B.实体法与程序法。C.诉讼实务O公用事业司法管辖区1740 E.不可否认的责任以上所有，加上1741。被告未能合作....司法部门未能合作;原告未能合作1747 vi.可能的解决方案是什么?1750 a。L立法1751 b案件管理/实体法/程序1752 C A类诉讼1753 d破产1754结论1756

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The Tragedy of the Asbestos Commons

INTRO DU CTIO N 1721 I. Is THERE AN ASBESTOS "COMMONS" PROBLEM? 1724 II. WHAT ARE THE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE CURRENT ASBESTOS LITIGATION LANDSCAPE? 1726 A. Econom ic Incentives 1728 1. The Traditional Model 1729 2. The Mass Tort Model (Single Defendant) 1731 3. The Mass Tort Model (Multiple Defendants) 1735 B. Substantive and Procedural Law . 1738 C. Litigation Practice 1739 D . O utlier Jurisdictions 1740 E. Undeniable Liability 1741 F. All of the Above, Plus 1741 III. THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANTS TO COOPERATE .... 1741 IV. THE FAILURE OF THE JUDICIARY TO COOPERATE 1745 V. THE FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS TO COOPERATE 1747 VI. WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS? 1750 A . L egislation 1751 B. Case Management/Substantive Law/Procedures 1752 C. C lass A ction 1753 D. Bankruptcy 1754 CONCLUSION 1756

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Virginia Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Virginia Law Review is a journal of general legal scholarship published by the students of the University of Virginia School of Law. The continuing objective of the Virginia Law Review is to publish a professional periodical devoted to legal and law-related issues that can be of use to judges, practitioners, teachers, legislators, students, and others interested in the law. First formally organized on April 23, 1913, the Virginia Law Review today remains one of the most respected and influential student legal periodicals in the country.

期刊最新文献

The God Cure: Spirituality as Therapy. Designing Business Forms to Pursue Social Goals Isolated Lambdoid Craniosynostosis. Unconstitutionally Illegitimate Discrimination Sovereign Immunity and the Constitutional Text