委员会关于滥用排他行为的指导文件——比看起来更激进?

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW European Law Review Pub Date : 2015-05-13 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2605788
A. Witt
{"title":"委员会关于滥用排他行为的指导文件——比看起来更激进?","authors":"A. Witt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2605788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introducing a more economic approach to European competition law has been a prime concern of DG Competition for the past 10 years. The Communication on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying art. 102 TFEU (ex 82 EC), issued in February 2009, constitutes the latest step in this comprehensive policy review. This contribution argues that, despite wording the Communication in a very cautious manner, the Commission has brought its approach to abusive exclusionary behaviour de facto into line with its more economic approach to art. 101 TFEU (ex 81 EC) and the Merger Regulation, as it shall no longer pursue conduct that is unlikely to result in direct consumer harm. This development is problematic because it does not appear compatible with the case law: effectively, the Communication overrides the Court’s position that direct consumer harm is not a requirement of art. 102 TFEU. In combination with the non-legal nature of the Communication and its theoretical vagueness, this discrepancy is further likely to engender significant legal uncertainty and endanger the uniform application of art. 102 TFEU at the national level.","PeriodicalId":45752,"journal":{"name":"European Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Commission's Guidance Paper on Abusive Exclusionary Conduct – More Radical than it Appears?\",\"authors\":\"A. Witt\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2605788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introducing a more economic approach to European competition law has been a prime concern of DG Competition for the past 10 years. The Communication on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying art. 102 TFEU (ex 82 EC), issued in February 2009, constitutes the latest step in this comprehensive policy review. This contribution argues that, despite wording the Communication in a very cautious manner, the Commission has brought its approach to abusive exclusionary behaviour de facto into line with its more economic approach to art. 101 TFEU (ex 81 EC) and the Merger Regulation, as it shall no longer pursue conduct that is unlikely to result in direct consumer harm. This development is problematic because it does not appear compatible with the case law: effectively, the Communication overrides the Court’s position that direct consumer harm is not a requirement of art. 102 TFEU. In combination with the non-legal nature of the Communication and its theoretical vagueness, this discrepancy is further likely to engender significant legal uncertainty and endanger the uniform application of art. 102 TFEU at the national level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2605788\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2605788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在过去10年里,在欧洲竞争法中引入更经济的方法一直是欧盟竞争委员会(DG competition)的主要关注点。关于委员会在适用art方面的执法优先事项的来文。2009年2月颁布的102 TFEU (ex 82 EC)是这项全面政策审查的最新步骤。这篇文章认为,尽管来文措辞非常谨慎,但委员会对滥用排斥行为的做法实际上与对艺术的更经济的做法一致。第101条TFEU (ex81 EC)和合并条例,因为它将不再追究不太可能对消费者造成直接损害的行为。这种发展是有问题的,因为它似乎与判例法不相容:实际上,《通信》推翻了法院的立场,即直接损害消费者不是艺术的要求。102 TFEU。再加上《传播》的非法律性质及其理论的模糊性,这种差异更有可能产生重大的法律不确定性,危及艺术的统一适用。国家一级102tfeu。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Commission's Guidance Paper on Abusive Exclusionary Conduct – More Radical than it Appears?
Introducing a more economic approach to European competition law has been a prime concern of DG Competition for the past 10 years. The Communication on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying art. 102 TFEU (ex 82 EC), issued in February 2009, constitutes the latest step in this comprehensive policy review. This contribution argues that, despite wording the Communication in a very cautious manner, the Commission has brought its approach to abusive exclusionary behaviour de facto into line with its more economic approach to art. 101 TFEU (ex 81 EC) and the Merger Regulation, as it shall no longer pursue conduct that is unlikely to result in direct consumer harm. This development is problematic because it does not appear compatible with the case law: effectively, the Communication overrides the Court’s position that direct consumer harm is not a requirement of art. 102 TFEU. In combination with the non-legal nature of the Communication and its theoretical vagueness, this discrepancy is further likely to engender significant legal uncertainty and endanger the uniform application of art. 102 TFEU at the national level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Playing by its own rules? A quantitative empirical analysis of justificatory reasoning in the registered trade mark case law of the European Court of Justice - dataset Beyond Food Safety: EU Food Information Standards as a Facilitator of Political Consumerism and International Law Enforcement Mechanism When Does a Communication to the Public Under EU Copyright Law Need to Be to a ‘New Public’? Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership - Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership: Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1