比较了FTIR、UV-VIS、hplc -DAD和ESI(+)MS对食用色素的分析效率

IF 0.5 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quimica Nova Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.21577/0100-4042.20230037
Marco Lyrio, D. Debona, N. Conceição, Francisco Gomes, A. Pereira, Henrique Frizzera, Jéssica Reis, Taila Grecco, Bruna Pires, Valdemar Lacerda Jr., E. Castro, Marsele Isidoro, P. Filgueiras, W. Romão
{"title":"比较了FTIR、UV-VIS、hplc -DAD和ESI(+)MS对食用色素的分析效率","authors":"Marco Lyrio, D. Debona, N. Conceição, Francisco Gomes, A. Pereira, Henrique Frizzera, Jéssica Reis, Taila Grecco, Bruna Pires, Valdemar Lacerda Jr., E. Castro, Marsele Isidoro, P. Filgueiras, W. Romão","doi":"10.21577/0100-4042.20230037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COMPARING THE ANALYTICAL EFFICIENCY OF FTIR, UV-VIS, CLAE-DAD AND ESI(+)MS TECHNIQUES IN THE STUDY OF FOOD DYES. Food additives are chemical substances added to improve organoleptic characteristics, in this context, there are several synthetic dyes, such as sunset yellow, tartrazine, erioglaucine, allura red, indigo carmine, and new coccine, that can also be identified through different analytical techniques such as infrared spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectrophotometry, high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector and mass spectrometry. Therefore, the objective of this work was to compare methods developed for different analytical techniques, in order to identify the one that presents greater efficiency in certain applications. For this, the patterns of the dyes were analyzed, as well as their mixtures and foods that had them. As a result, the CLAE-DAD presents excellent selectivity and linearity of the calibration curves, but it presents higher LD and LQ values when compared to the UV-Vis, in turn the infrared provides information regarding functional groups and bonds. Mass spectrometry showed great capabilities in identifying the molecular formula and better selectivity in the absence of the erioglaucine dye. It is not feasible to indicate the best or worst analytical approach, but it is possible to point out which one is more suitable for each application. Regarding the quantification capacity, chromatography and UV-Vis are good alternatives, but in mixtures containing more than one dye, CLAE-DAD is more suitable due to the better selectivity. Regarding the identification capacity, mass spectrometry, especially FT-ICR MS, is the most appropriate technique to propose molecular formulas due to its high resolution and mass accuracy. The advantage of FTIR was the easier sample preparation, being able to analyze the dyes in the solid state.","PeriodicalId":49641,"journal":{"name":"Quimica Nova","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARANDO A EFICIÊNCIA ANALÍTICA DAS TÉCNICAS FTIR, UV-VIS, CLAE-DAD E ESI(+)MS NO ESTUDO DE CORANTES ALIMENTARES\",\"authors\":\"Marco Lyrio, D. Debona, N. Conceição, Francisco Gomes, A. Pereira, Henrique Frizzera, Jéssica Reis, Taila Grecco, Bruna Pires, Valdemar Lacerda Jr., E. Castro, Marsele Isidoro, P. Filgueiras, W. Romão\",\"doi\":\"10.21577/0100-4042.20230037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COMPARING THE ANALYTICAL EFFICIENCY OF FTIR, UV-VIS, CLAE-DAD AND ESI(+)MS TECHNIQUES IN THE STUDY OF FOOD DYES. Food additives are chemical substances added to improve organoleptic characteristics, in this context, there are several synthetic dyes, such as sunset yellow, tartrazine, erioglaucine, allura red, indigo carmine, and new coccine, that can also be identified through different analytical techniques such as infrared spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectrophotometry, high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector and mass spectrometry. Therefore, the objective of this work was to compare methods developed for different analytical techniques, in order to identify the one that presents greater efficiency in certain applications. For this, the patterns of the dyes were analyzed, as well as their mixtures and foods that had them. As a result, the CLAE-DAD presents excellent selectivity and linearity of the calibration curves, but it presents higher LD and LQ values when compared to the UV-Vis, in turn the infrared provides information regarding functional groups and bonds. Mass spectrometry showed great capabilities in identifying the molecular formula and better selectivity in the absence of the erioglaucine dye. It is not feasible to indicate the best or worst analytical approach, but it is possible to point out which one is more suitable for each application. Regarding the quantification capacity, chromatography and UV-Vis are good alternatives, but in mixtures containing more than one dye, CLAE-DAD is more suitable due to the better selectivity. Regarding the identification capacity, mass spectrometry, especially FT-ICR MS, is the most appropriate technique to propose molecular formulas due to its high resolution and mass accuracy. The advantage of FTIR was the easier sample preparation, being able to analyze the dyes in the solid state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quimica Nova\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quimica Nova\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20230037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quimica Nova","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20230037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了ftir、uv-vis、clae-dad和esi (+) ms技术在食品染料研究中的分析效率。食品添加剂是为了改善感官特性而添加的化学物质,在这种情况下,有几种合成染料,如日落黄、酒石黄、erioglaucine、诱惑红、靛蓝胭脂红和新coccine,也可以通过不同的分析技术,如红外光谱、紫外可见分光光度法、二极管阵列检测器的高效液相色谱法和质谱法进行鉴定。因此,这项工作的目的是比较为不同的分析技术开发的方法,以确定在某些应用中表现出更高的效率。为此,研究人员分析了染料的模式,以及它们的混合物和含有它们的食物。结果表明,CLAE-DAD具有良好的选择性和线性,但与UV-Vis相比,它具有更高的LD和LQ值,反过来红外提供了官能团和键的信息。质谱法在不含erioglucine染料的情况下具有较好的分子式鉴定能力和选择性。指出最佳或最差的分析方法是不可行的,但可以指出哪一种更适合每种应用程序。就定量能力而言,色谱法和UV-Vis法是很好的选择,但在含有多种染料的混合物中,CLAE-DAD法因其更好的选择性而更适合。在鉴定能力方面,质谱,特别是FT-ICR MS,由于其高分辨率和质量精度,是最适合提出分子式的技术。FTIR的优点是更容易制备样品,能够分析固态染料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARANDO A EFICIÊNCIA ANALÍTICA DAS TÉCNICAS FTIR, UV-VIS, CLAE-DAD E ESI(+)MS NO ESTUDO DE CORANTES ALIMENTARES
COMPARING THE ANALYTICAL EFFICIENCY OF FTIR, UV-VIS, CLAE-DAD AND ESI(+)MS TECHNIQUES IN THE STUDY OF FOOD DYES. Food additives are chemical substances added to improve organoleptic characteristics, in this context, there are several synthetic dyes, such as sunset yellow, tartrazine, erioglaucine, allura red, indigo carmine, and new coccine, that can also be identified through different analytical techniques such as infrared spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectrophotometry, high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector and mass spectrometry. Therefore, the objective of this work was to compare methods developed for different analytical techniques, in order to identify the one that presents greater efficiency in certain applications. For this, the patterns of the dyes were analyzed, as well as their mixtures and foods that had them. As a result, the CLAE-DAD presents excellent selectivity and linearity of the calibration curves, but it presents higher LD and LQ values when compared to the UV-Vis, in turn the infrared provides information regarding functional groups and bonds. Mass spectrometry showed great capabilities in identifying the molecular formula and better selectivity in the absence of the erioglaucine dye. It is not feasible to indicate the best or worst analytical approach, but it is possible to point out which one is more suitable for each application. Regarding the quantification capacity, chromatography and UV-Vis are good alternatives, but in mixtures containing more than one dye, CLAE-DAD is more suitable due to the better selectivity. Regarding the identification capacity, mass spectrometry, especially FT-ICR MS, is the most appropriate technique to propose molecular formulas due to its high resolution and mass accuracy. The advantage of FTIR was the easier sample preparation, being able to analyze the dyes in the solid state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quimica Nova
Quimica Nova 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Química Nova publishes in portuguese, spanish and english, original research articles, revisions, technical notes and articles about education in chemistry. All the manuscripts submitted to QN are evaluated by, at least, two reviewers (from Brazil and abroad) of recognized expertise in the field of chemistry involved in the manuscript. The Editorial Council can be eventually asked to review manuscripts. Editors are responsible for the final edition of QN.
期刊最新文献
ATIVAÇÃO DE COMPOSTO ORGÂNICO COM ÁCIDO FOSFÓRICO E OS EFEITOS NA ADSORÇÃO DE Pb E Cd UTILIZAÇÃO DE MODELOS IN SILICO PARA AVALIAÇÃO DA TOXICIDADE DE RESÍDUOS DE AGROTÓXICOS, FÁRMACOS E METABÓLITOS EM ÁGUAS NATURAIS RGB-LED-PHOTOMETER AND THE DIGITAL IMAGE-BASED METHOD USING A SMARTPHONE FOR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS TEACHING INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E ENSINO DE QUÍMICA: UMA ANÁLISE PROPEDÊUTICA DO CHATGPT NA DEFINIÇÃO DE CONCEITOS QUÍMICOS A COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF THE ANTIOXIDANT POWER OF EUGENOL COMPARED TO VITAMIN C
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1