大豆分子标记育种方法的有效性评价

4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Genetika-Belgrade Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/gensr2201265k
G. Khosla, B. S. Gill, A. Sirari, Pritpal Singh
{"title":"大豆分子标记育种方法的有效性评价","authors":"G. Khosla, B. S. Gill, A. Sirari, Pritpal Singh","doi":"10.2298/gensr2201265k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four breeding methods viz. pedigree method (PM), single pod descent (SPD), single pod descent with selection (SPDS) and bulk method (BM) were compared for maintaining variability in the population in advanced generations using simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers. The F4:7 lines advanced through different breeding methods from six different crosses were evaluated for number of unique lines retained in each method at a similarity coefficient ? 0.875. Eighteen polymorphic SSR markers were used for estimating similarity coefficient between lines within a breeding method in each cross. In all the crosses, SPD method was the best method in producing unique lines with a range from 42.9 to 100 per cent. SPD method had also the least number of lines pairing with two or more lines. PM and BM had the least number of unique lines in three crosses each and also maximum proportion of lines produced by these two methods were paired with four or more lines. Thus, SPD method was the most efficient among these four methods in retaining the variability in a population, but the breeder has to make a choice between high variability and comparative harvest and seed processing efficiencies to select the most suitable breeding method.","PeriodicalId":50423,"journal":{"name":"Genetika-Belgrade","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of efficiency of breeding methods using molecular markers in soybean\",\"authors\":\"G. Khosla, B. S. Gill, A. Sirari, Pritpal Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/gensr2201265k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Four breeding methods viz. pedigree method (PM), single pod descent (SPD), single pod descent with selection (SPDS) and bulk method (BM) were compared for maintaining variability in the population in advanced generations using simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers. The F4:7 lines advanced through different breeding methods from six different crosses were evaluated for number of unique lines retained in each method at a similarity coefficient ? 0.875. Eighteen polymorphic SSR markers were used for estimating similarity coefficient between lines within a breeding method in each cross. In all the crosses, SPD method was the best method in producing unique lines with a range from 42.9 to 100 per cent. SPD method had also the least number of lines pairing with two or more lines. PM and BM had the least number of unique lines in three crosses each and also maximum proportion of lines produced by these two methods were paired with four or more lines. Thus, SPD method was the most efficient among these four methods in retaining the variability in a population, but the breeder has to make a choice between high variability and comparative harvest and seed processing efficiencies to select the most suitable breeding method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetika-Belgrade\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetika-Belgrade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/gensr2201265k\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetika-Belgrade","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/gensr2201265k","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用SSR标记,比较了家系法(PM)、单荚下降法(SPD)、单荚下降选择法(SPDS)和群体法(BM) 4种育种方法对高代群体保持变异的效果。对6个不同杂交组合采用不同育种方法获得的F4:7系,以相似系数?0.875. 利用18个多态SSR标记对每个杂交在同一育种方法下的系间相似性系数进行估算。在所有杂交组合中,SPD方法的单倍率为42.9% ~ 100%,SPD方法的单倍率也最低。PM和BM分别在3个杂交中获得的唯一株系数最少,且两种杂交方法产生的株系配对4个或4个以上株系的比例最大。因此,在这四种方法中,SPD方法在保持种群变异方面是最有效的,但育种者必须在高变异和比较收获和种子加工效率之间做出选择,以选择最合适的育种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of efficiency of breeding methods using molecular markers in soybean
Four breeding methods viz. pedigree method (PM), single pod descent (SPD), single pod descent with selection (SPDS) and bulk method (BM) were compared for maintaining variability in the population in advanced generations using simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers. The F4:7 lines advanced through different breeding methods from six different crosses were evaluated for number of unique lines retained in each method at a similarity coefficient ? 0.875. Eighteen polymorphic SSR markers were used for estimating similarity coefficient between lines within a breeding method in each cross. In all the crosses, SPD method was the best method in producing unique lines with a range from 42.9 to 100 per cent. SPD method had also the least number of lines pairing with two or more lines. PM and BM had the least number of unique lines in three crosses each and also maximum proportion of lines produced by these two methods were paired with four or more lines. Thus, SPD method was the most efficient among these four methods in retaining the variability in a population, but the breeder has to make a choice between high variability and comparative harvest and seed processing efficiencies to select the most suitable breeding method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetika-Belgrade
Genetika-Belgrade AGRONOMY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The GENETIKA is dedicated to genetic studies of all organisms including genetics of microorganisms, plant genetics, animal genetics, human genetics, molecular genetics, genomics, functional genomics, plant and animal breeding, population and evolutionary genetics, mutagenesis and genotoxicology and biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
C9orf72 genetic screening in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients from Serbia Investigation of molecular variability in some Aegilops species using Start Codon Targeted Polymorphism (SCoT) and CAAT-Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) markers Assessment of genetic purity and earliness in F1 and F2 population of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using SSR markers Performance prediction of F1 crosses in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) based on morphological and molecular divergence Estimating gene action and combining ability for yield and fiber quality in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1