反歧视法歧视:残障法中变性人的尊严权利

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems Pub Date : 2016-07-06 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2805781
K. Aber
{"title":"反歧视法歧视:残障法中变性人的尊严权利","authors":"K. Aber","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2805781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note examines the claim that the exclusion of gender identity disorders from the Americans with Disabilities Act violates the dignitary rights of transgender individuals. In order to do this, this Note discusses the developing concept of dignitary rights, particularly in the context of the Supreme Court's many references to dignity in its LGBT jurisprudence, and concludes that the exclusion is unconstitutional because it violates the dignity of transgender individuals by stigmatizing them and preventing them from seeking access to anti-discrimination protection to which they may otherwise be entitled.","PeriodicalId":43291,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems","volume":"50 1","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Anti-Discrimination Law Discriminates: A Right to Transgender Dignity in Disability Law\",\"authors\":\"K. Aber\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2805781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note examines the claim that the exclusion of gender identity disorders from the Americans with Disabilities Act violates the dignitary rights of transgender individuals. In order to do this, this Note discusses the developing concept of dignitary rights, particularly in the context of the Supreme Court's many references to dignity in its LGBT jurisprudence, and concludes that the exclusion is unconstitutional because it violates the dignity of transgender individuals by stigmatizing them and preventing them from seeking access to anti-discrimination protection to which they may otherwise be entitled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2805781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2805781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了将性别认同障碍排除在《美国残疾人法案》之外侵犯了跨性别者尊严权利的说法。为了做到这一点,本文讨论了尊严权的发展概念,特别是在最高法院在其LGBT判例中多次提到尊严的背景下,并得出结论认为,这种排斥是违宪的,因为它侵犯了跨性别者的尊严,使他们污名化,并阻止他们寻求他们本来有权获得的反歧视保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When Anti-Discrimination Law Discriminates: A Right to Transgender Dignity in Disability Law
This note examines the claim that the exclusion of gender identity disorders from the Americans with Disabilities Act violates the dignitary rights of transgender individuals. In order to do this, this Note discusses the developing concept of dignitary rights, particularly in the context of the Supreme Court's many references to dignity in its LGBT jurisprudence, and concludes that the exclusion is unconstitutional because it violates the dignity of transgender individuals by stigmatizing them and preventing them from seeking access to anti-discrimination protection to which they may otherwise be entitled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Access Denied: Data Breach Litigation, Article III Standing, and a Proposed Statutory Solution When Anti-Discrimination Law Discriminates: A Right to Transgender Dignity in Disability Law Charter School Jurisprudence and the Democratic Ideal Inadequate Access: Reforming Reproductive Health Care Policies for Women Incarcerated in New York State Correctional Facilities The Internet of Things and Potential Remedies in Privacy Tort Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1