收入不平等决定因素的新证据

Kwanho Shin, Donggyun Shin
{"title":"收入不平等决定因素的新证据","authors":"Kwanho Shin, Donggyun Shin","doi":"10.22812/JETEM.2013.24.2.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates determinants of income inequality. To refect that income distribution underwent structural changes recently, we analyze various inequality measures: the Gini coefficient, the Estimated Household Income Inequality (EHII) index, and the income share of the top 1 percent. Analysis of country-level panel data suggests that, contrary to the Kuznetz hypothesis, income inequality has worsened recently among developed countries, which is more evident in the income share of the top 1%. The apparent negative effects of trade openness on income inequality are explained by other control variables, and the negative impact of financial openness is observed when the top 1 percent is analyzed. Technological progress is positively associated with income inequality, as measured by the Gini or the top 1 percent, but not the EHII. It is also found that, while income inequality worsens in the degree to which individuals can participate in the political process of their country, it is reduced by expanded government expenditures.","PeriodicalId":39995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"125-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New evidence on determinants of income inequality\",\"authors\":\"Kwanho Shin, Donggyun Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.22812/JETEM.2013.24.2.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates determinants of income inequality. To refect that income distribution underwent structural changes recently, we analyze various inequality measures: the Gini coefficient, the Estimated Household Income Inequality (EHII) index, and the income share of the top 1 percent. Analysis of country-level panel data suggests that, contrary to the Kuznetz hypothesis, income inequality has worsened recently among developed countries, which is more evident in the income share of the top 1%. The apparent negative effects of trade openness on income inequality are explained by other control variables, and the negative impact of financial openness is observed when the top 1 percent is analyzed. Technological progress is positively associated with income inequality, as measured by the Gini or the top 1 percent, but not the EHII. It is also found that, while income inequality worsens in the degree to which individuals can participate in the political process of their country, it is reduced by expanded government expenditures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"125-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22812/JETEM.2013.24.2.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22812/JETEM.2013.24.2.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了收入不平等的决定因素。为了反映收入分配最近发生的结构性变化,我们分析了各种不平等指标:基尼系数、估计家庭收入不平等指数(EHII)和收入最高的1%的收入份额。对国家级面板数据的分析表明,与库兹涅茨假设相反,发达国家的收入不平等最近有所恶化,这在收入最高的1%人群的收入份额中表现得更为明显。贸易开放对收入不平等的明显负面影响可以用其他控制变量来解释,当分析收入最高的1%时,可以观察到金融开放的负面影响。技术进步与收入不平等呈正相关,这是用基尼系数或收入最高的1%来衡量的,而不是用EHII来衡量。研究还发现,虽然收入不平等在个人参与国家政治进程的程度上恶化了,但政府支出的扩大却减少了这种不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New evidence on determinants of income inequality
This paper investigates determinants of income inequality. To refect that income distribution underwent structural changes recently, we analyze various inequality measures: the Gini coefficient, the Estimated Household Income Inequality (EHII) index, and the income share of the top 1 percent. Analysis of country-level panel data suggests that, contrary to the Kuznetz hypothesis, income inequality has worsened recently among developed countries, which is more evident in the income share of the top 1%. The apparent negative effects of trade openness on income inequality are explained by other control variables, and the negative impact of financial openness is observed when the top 1 percent is analyzed. Technological progress is positively associated with income inequality, as measured by the Gini or the top 1 percent, but not the EHII. It is also found that, while income inequality worsens in the degree to which individuals can participate in the political process of their country, it is reduced by expanded government expenditures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics
Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Ambient Air Pollution on Health Risk in Korea: A Spatial Panel Model Assessment Earned Income Tax Credit and Heterogenous Agent Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model Macroeconomic Changes since 2000 and DSGE Models Does Credit Supply Accelerate Business Cycle Changes in Korea?: Some New Evidence by Incorporating Regime Changes Natural Interest Rate, Potential GDP Growth Rate and Long-Term Monetary Policy Stance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1