社会福利的新途径:税收-养老金组合

Yong-jin Kim, Chul-In Lee
{"title":"社会福利的新途径:税收-养老金组合","authors":"Yong-jin Kim, Chul-In Lee","doi":"10.22812/JETEM.2019.30.3.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We view social welfare as a system that redistributes resources (i) within a generation and (ii) across generations so as to maximize social wellbeing. By setting tax and expenditure institutions properly, we implement optimal social welfare. Notable are the following implications: (i) in the presence of rising earnings inequality, redistribution within a generation is more important than that across generations. Fiscal policies in this line need to be stressed. (ii) Under low rates of population and economic growth, redistribution in the form of pensions loses its efficacy and therefore should not be encouraged for welfare reasons. This point has also been supported by pension reforms in many welfare states. Our preliminary calibration analysis confirms these conclusions numerically.","PeriodicalId":39995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics","volume":"30 1","pages":"50-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Approach to Social Welfare: tax-pension combination\",\"authors\":\"Yong-jin Kim, Chul-In Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.22812/JETEM.2019.30.3.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We view social welfare as a system that redistributes resources (i) within a generation and (ii) across generations so as to maximize social wellbeing. By setting tax and expenditure institutions properly, we implement optimal social welfare. Notable are the following implications: (i) in the presence of rising earnings inequality, redistribution within a generation is more important than that across generations. Fiscal policies in this line need to be stressed. (ii) Under low rates of population and economic growth, redistribution in the form of pensions loses its efficacy and therefore should not be encouraged for welfare reasons. This point has also been supported by pension reforms in many welfare states. Our preliminary calibration analysis confirms these conclusions numerically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"50-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22812/JETEM.2019.30.3.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22812/JETEM.2019.30.3.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们认为社会福利是一种重新分配资源的制度(1)在一代人内和(2)在几代人之间,以最大限度地提高社会福利。通过合理设置税收和支出制度,实现最优的社会福利。值得注意的是以下含义:(i)在收入不平等加剧的情况下,一代人内部的再分配比几代人之间的再分配更重要。这方面的财政政策需要得到强调。在人口和经济增长率低的情况下,以养恤金形式进行的再分配失去了效力,因此出于福利原因不应予以鼓励。这一点也得到了许多福利国家养老金改革的支持。我们的初步校准分析在数值上证实了这些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Approach to Social Welfare: tax-pension combination
We view social welfare as a system that redistributes resources (i) within a generation and (ii) across generations so as to maximize social wellbeing. By setting tax and expenditure institutions properly, we implement optimal social welfare. Notable are the following implications: (i) in the presence of rising earnings inequality, redistribution within a generation is more important than that across generations. Fiscal policies in this line need to be stressed. (ii) Under low rates of population and economic growth, redistribution in the form of pensions loses its efficacy and therefore should not be encouraged for welfare reasons. This point has also been supported by pension reforms in many welfare states. Our preliminary calibration analysis confirms these conclusions numerically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics
Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Ambient Air Pollution on Health Risk in Korea: A Spatial Panel Model Assessment Earned Income Tax Credit and Heterogenous Agent Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model Macroeconomic Changes since 2000 and DSGE Models Does Credit Supply Accelerate Business Cycle Changes in Korea?: Some New Evidence by Incorporating Regime Changes Natural Interest Rate, Potential GDP Growth Rate and Long-Term Monetary Policy Stance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1