克罗地亚共和国的家庭杀人案:肇事者在进行采访时陈述的特点

Ksenija Butorac
{"title":"克罗地亚共和国的家庭杀人案:肇事者在进行采访时陈述的特点","authors":"Ksenija Butorac","doi":"10.19080/jfsci.2018.11.555808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous foreign researchers [1-4]. but also researchers in the Republic of Croatia [5-9]. conducted a series of scientific researches primarily related to the criminological characteristics of homicides, family homicides, and homicide of intimate partners. Given that a number of authors were primarily concerned with the research of the criminological characteristics of family homicides, in this paper, apart from some criminological characteristics related to homicide perpetrators, it was also investigated how these perpetrators behaved in relation with their certain characteristics in the course of criminal investigation at the police station, or whether they admit or denounce the criminal offense they were charged during the interview. The manner in which they gave their statement to the police was interesting to investigate also due to the fact that a year ago, in Croatian criminal legislation, significant amendments took place in the context of the police officers’ handling of an interview with the suspect Namely, in the Republic of Croatia, the procedure of police officers during criminal investigation is standardized by the Criminal Procedure Act [10 ], the Police Duties and Powers Act [11] and the Code of Practice for Police Officers. The mentioned significant amendment in Croatian criminal legislation occurred in the last VII. Novella of Criminal Procedure Act. At that time, Directive 2013/48 / EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty (hereinafter referred to as the Directive 2013/48 / EU) was transposed. Unlike the previous period in which the police conducted an informal interview with the suspect, the Article 208a of the Criminal Procedure Act formalizes the suspect’s questioning by police officers by determining the content of the summons to the suspect for questioning, the content of the instruction on his/her rights to be given before the questioning, clear warnings about the right to a lawyer, the course of questioning and its recording (audio-video recording), as well as the consequences of the violation of thus prescribed manner of suspect’s questioning Considering the new provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act, and taking into account that the practical aspect of informal investigative interview with the suspect is of Abstract","PeriodicalId":93024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences & criminal investigation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Homicide in The Republic Of Croatia: Perpetrators’ Characteristics In Regard to Their Statement When Conducting The Interview\",\"authors\":\"Ksenija Butorac\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/jfsci.2018.11.555808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous foreign researchers [1-4]. but also researchers in the Republic of Croatia [5-9]. conducted a series of scientific researches primarily related to the criminological characteristics of homicides, family homicides, and homicide of intimate partners. Given that a number of authors were primarily concerned with the research of the criminological characteristics of family homicides, in this paper, apart from some criminological characteristics related to homicide perpetrators, it was also investigated how these perpetrators behaved in relation with their certain characteristics in the course of criminal investigation at the police station, or whether they admit or denounce the criminal offense they were charged during the interview. The manner in which they gave their statement to the police was interesting to investigate also due to the fact that a year ago, in Croatian criminal legislation, significant amendments took place in the context of the police officers’ handling of an interview with the suspect Namely, in the Republic of Croatia, the procedure of police officers during criminal investigation is standardized by the Criminal Procedure Act [10 ], the Police Duties and Powers Act [11] and the Code of Practice for Police Officers. The mentioned significant amendment in Croatian criminal legislation occurred in the last VII. Novella of Criminal Procedure Act. At that time, Directive 2013/48 / EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty (hereinafter referred to as the Directive 2013/48 / EU) was transposed. Unlike the previous period in which the police conducted an informal interview with the suspect, the Article 208a of the Criminal Procedure Act formalizes the suspect’s questioning by police officers by determining the content of the summons to the suspect for questioning, the content of the instruction on his/her rights to be given before the questioning, clear warnings about the right to a lawyer, the course of questioning and its recording (audio-video recording), as well as the consequences of the violation of thus prescribed manner of suspect’s questioning Considering the new provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act, and taking into account that the practical aspect of informal investigative interview with the suspect is of Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":93024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences & criminal investigation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences & criminal investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/jfsci.2018.11.555808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences & criminal investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/jfsci.2018.11.555808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国外众多研究者[1-4]。还有克罗地亚共和国的研究人员[5-9]。开展了一系列以杀人罪、家庭杀人罪、亲密伴侣杀人罪的犯罪学特征为主要内容的科学研究。鉴于一些作者主要关注的是家庭杀人案的犯罪学特征研究,本文除了研究杀人案犯罪分子的一些犯罪学特征外,还考察了这些犯罪分子在派出所刑侦过程中是如何与其特定特征相联系的,或者在采访中是否承认或谴责被指控的犯罪行为。他们向警方提供证词的方式值得调查,这也是因为一年前克罗地亚刑事立法对警官与嫌疑犯面谈的方式进行了重大修订,即在克罗地亚共和国,刑事调查期间警官的程序已由《刑事诉讼法》统一规定。《警察职责和权力法》和《警察工作守则》。上文提到的克罗地亚刑事立法的重大修正发生在上一个七年。刑事诉讼法中篇。当时,欧洲议会和理事会2013年10月22日关于在刑事诉讼和欧洲逮捕令程序中接触律师的权利,以及在被剥夺自由时通知第三方和在被剥夺自由期间与第三方和领事当局沟通的权利的第2013/48 / EU号指令(以下简称第2013/48 / EU号指令)被调换。《刑事诉讼法》第208a条规定,与以往警方对嫌疑人进行非正式面谈的方式不同,警方对嫌疑人进行审问的内容包括:传唤嫌疑人的内容、审问前对嫌疑人的权利指示内容、明确的律师权利警告、审问过程和录音(录音录像)等。考虑到《刑事诉讼法》的新规定,并考虑到对犯罪嫌疑人进行非正式侦讯的实践方面具有抽象性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Family Homicide in The Republic Of Croatia: Perpetrators’ Characteristics In Regard to Their Statement When Conducting The Interview
Numerous foreign researchers [1-4]. but also researchers in the Republic of Croatia [5-9]. conducted a series of scientific researches primarily related to the criminological characteristics of homicides, family homicides, and homicide of intimate partners. Given that a number of authors were primarily concerned with the research of the criminological characteristics of family homicides, in this paper, apart from some criminological characteristics related to homicide perpetrators, it was also investigated how these perpetrators behaved in relation with their certain characteristics in the course of criminal investigation at the police station, or whether they admit or denounce the criminal offense they were charged during the interview. The manner in which they gave their statement to the police was interesting to investigate also due to the fact that a year ago, in Croatian criminal legislation, significant amendments took place in the context of the police officers’ handling of an interview with the suspect Namely, in the Republic of Croatia, the procedure of police officers during criminal investigation is standardized by the Criminal Procedure Act [10 ], the Police Duties and Powers Act [11] and the Code of Practice for Police Officers. The mentioned significant amendment in Croatian criminal legislation occurred in the last VII. Novella of Criminal Procedure Act. At that time, Directive 2013/48 / EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty (hereinafter referred to as the Directive 2013/48 / EU) was transposed. Unlike the previous period in which the police conducted an informal interview with the suspect, the Article 208a of the Criminal Procedure Act formalizes the suspect’s questioning by police officers by determining the content of the summons to the suspect for questioning, the content of the instruction on his/her rights to be given before the questioning, clear warnings about the right to a lawyer, the course of questioning and its recording (audio-video recording), as well as the consequences of the violation of thus prescribed manner of suspect’s questioning Considering the new provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act, and taking into account that the practical aspect of informal investigative interview with the suspect is of Abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fatal Manual Strangulation: A Brief Overview Approaches for the Detection of Latent Fingermarks on Deceased Human Bodies Military Aspects of Malingering, Sexual and Reproductive Coercion: Report from Russia Sex Estimation in the Forensic Anthropology Classroom: Some Students Wonder, Where do I fit? Differentiation of Cut Damage caused by Sharp Objects on Cotton Clothes using SEM Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1