建立具有两个介入和一个响应变量的随机二维响应面路径设计

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials Pub Date : 2016-10-13 DOI:10.2147/OAJCT.S115168
T. Holand, Sagita Dewi, S. Larsen
{"title":"建立具有两个介入和一个响应变量的随机二维响应面路径设计","authors":"T. Holand, Sagita Dewi, S. Larsen","doi":"10.2147/OAJCT.S115168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The response surface pathway (RSP) design obtains a random walk pathway, does not need an assumed statistical model, reduces the sample size without reducing accuracy, and covers predefined dose windows. RSP includes one interventional and one result variable without random allocation of doses between design levels. This study aims to present RSP with two interventional and one result variables, combining between- and within-patient models and introduce a randomization procedure in a clinical situation. Methods: To estimate optimal efficacy dose and spreading duration of particulate CaO powder, material consisting of 18 net pens with salmon indicated for lice treatment was required. The study was performed as a randomized “between-patient” RSP designed trial with CaO dose as the interventional variable and percentage lice reduction as the outcome. Each net pen received three treatments with 24-hour intervals of unchanged CaO dose and a starting spreading duration of 2 hours. The change in spreading duration followed a “within-patient” RSP procedure with percentage lice reduction as the outcome. In all participating fish farms, one net pen remained untreated and was used as control. Results: The minimum and the optimal efficacy doses were estimated to be 6.1 g/kg and 8.5 g/kg biomass (bm), respectively. In order to optimize lice reduction, the spreading duration increases with increasing CaO dose. The minimum efficacy combination was predicted to be 6.1 g/kg bm administered in 2:00 (h:mm) and the optimal to be 8.5 g/kg bm in 3:00. Three of the seven net pens allocated to 7.4 g/kg bm erroneously received 8.5 g/kg and due to weather circumstances three other net pens became untreated. Consequently, accuracy of the predictions was slightly reduced. Conclusion: The two-dimensional RSP design combining between- and within-patient RSP detected its power and predicted the two interventional variables to obtain minimum and optimal efficacy with sufficient accuracy.","PeriodicalId":19500,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJCT.S115168","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a randomized two-dimensional response surface pathway design with two interventional and one response variables\",\"authors\":\"T. Holand, Sagita Dewi, S. Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAJCT.S115168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The response surface pathway (RSP) design obtains a random walk pathway, does not need an assumed statistical model, reduces the sample size without reducing accuracy, and covers predefined dose windows. RSP includes one interventional and one result variable without random allocation of doses between design levels. This study aims to present RSP with two interventional and one result variables, combining between- and within-patient models and introduce a randomization procedure in a clinical situation. Methods: To estimate optimal efficacy dose and spreading duration of particulate CaO powder, material consisting of 18 net pens with salmon indicated for lice treatment was required. The study was performed as a randomized “between-patient” RSP designed trial with CaO dose as the interventional variable and percentage lice reduction as the outcome. Each net pen received three treatments with 24-hour intervals of unchanged CaO dose and a starting spreading duration of 2 hours. The change in spreading duration followed a “within-patient” RSP procedure with percentage lice reduction as the outcome. In all participating fish farms, one net pen remained untreated and was used as control. Results: The minimum and the optimal efficacy doses were estimated to be 6.1 g/kg and 8.5 g/kg biomass (bm), respectively. In order to optimize lice reduction, the spreading duration increases with increasing CaO dose. The minimum efficacy combination was predicted to be 6.1 g/kg bm administered in 2:00 (h:mm) and the optimal to be 8.5 g/kg bm in 3:00. Three of the seven net pens allocated to 7.4 g/kg bm erroneously received 8.5 g/kg and due to weather circumstances three other net pens became untreated. Consequently, accuracy of the predictions was slightly reduced. Conclusion: The two-dimensional RSP design combining between- and within-patient RSP detected its power and predicted the two interventional variables to obtain minimum and optimal efficacy with sufficient accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJCT.S115168\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJCT.S115168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJCT.S115168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:响应面路径(RSP)设计获得随机游走路径,不需要假设的统计模型,在不降低准确性的情况下减少样本量,并涵盖预定义的剂量窗。RSP包括一个介入变量和一个结果变量,在设计水平之间没有随机分配剂量。本研究旨在为RSP提供两个介入变量和一个结果变量,结合患者间和患者内模型,并在临床情况下引入随机化程序。方法:采用18支网笔、鲑鱼网笔等材料,估算颗粒型CaO粉的最佳药效剂量和扩散时间。该研究是一项随机“患者间”RSP设计的试验,以CaO剂量为干预变量,以虱子减少百分比为结果。每个网笔进行三次处理,间隔24小时,CaO剂量不变,开始扩散时间为2小时。传播持续时间的变化遵循“患者内部”RSP程序,以虱子减少百分比为结果。在所有参与调查的养鱼场中,有一个网圈未经处理,用作对照。结果:最小和最佳药效剂量分别为6.1 g/kg和8.5 g/kg生物质(bm)。为了达到最佳的减虱效果,随着CaO用量的增加,扩散时间增加。最小联合用药剂量为6.1 g/kg体重,时间为2:00 (h:mm),最佳联合用药剂量为8.5 g/kg体重,时间为3:00。分配给7.4克/公斤体重的7支蚊帐中,有3支错误地收到了8.5克/公斤体重,另外3支蚊帐由于天气原因没有得到处理。因此,预测的准确性略有降低。结论:结合患者间RSP和患者内RSP的二维RSP设计检测其功率并预测两个介入变量,以获得最小和最佳的疗效,具有足够的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a randomized two-dimensional response surface pathway design with two interventional and one response variables
Background: The response surface pathway (RSP) design obtains a random walk pathway, does not need an assumed statistical model, reduces the sample size without reducing accuracy, and covers predefined dose windows. RSP includes one interventional and one result variable without random allocation of doses between design levels. This study aims to present RSP with two interventional and one result variables, combining between- and within-patient models and introduce a randomization procedure in a clinical situation. Methods: To estimate optimal efficacy dose and spreading duration of particulate CaO powder, material consisting of 18 net pens with salmon indicated for lice treatment was required. The study was performed as a randomized “between-patient” RSP designed trial with CaO dose as the interventional variable and percentage lice reduction as the outcome. Each net pen received three treatments with 24-hour intervals of unchanged CaO dose and a starting spreading duration of 2 hours. The change in spreading duration followed a “within-patient” RSP procedure with percentage lice reduction as the outcome. In all participating fish farms, one net pen remained untreated and was used as control. Results: The minimum and the optimal efficacy doses were estimated to be 6.1 g/kg and 8.5 g/kg biomass (bm), respectively. In order to optimize lice reduction, the spreading duration increases with increasing CaO dose. The minimum efficacy combination was predicted to be 6.1 g/kg bm administered in 2:00 (h:mm) and the optimal to be 8.5 g/kg bm in 3:00. Three of the seven net pens allocated to 7.4 g/kg bm erroneously received 8.5 g/kg and due to weather circumstances three other net pens became untreated. Consequently, accuracy of the predictions was slightly reduced. Conclusion: The two-dimensional RSP design combining between- and within-patient RSP detected its power and predicted the two interventional variables to obtain minimum and optimal efficacy with sufficient accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials
Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Newly Developed Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group to Promote Healthy Aging Among Older People with HIV: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Center with or Without a Coordinator? The Coordinator as an Integral Part of a Research Team A Multidomain Intervention Program for Older People with Dementia: A Pilot Study Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Insulin Fast Dissolving Films versus Control Group for Anosmic Patients for Improving Their Health and Social Qualities of Life Treatment of Oropharyngeal Symptoms: A Prospective, Single-Dose, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1