{"title":"欧盟法律对斯特拉斯堡学说的影响","authors":"Tobias Lock","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2922462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies four distinct areas of EU law influence on the ECtHR's doctrines: references for informational purposes; references to support an autonomous interpretation; legal transplants; and references in the context of evolutive interpretation. EU law is relevant for both the determination of the scope of Convention rights and for the ECtHR's proportionality analysis, but EU law influence is not confined to the case law of the CJEU. It includes the full spectrum of EU legal materials. While it welcomes the ECtHR's engagement with developments at EU level, the article expresses a normative critique that is underpinned by a concern that the ECtHR's reasoning is often lacking in clarity and exposition of argument.","PeriodicalId":45752,"journal":{"name":"European Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"804-825"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of EU law on Strasbourg doctrines\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Lock\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2922462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article identifies four distinct areas of EU law influence on the ECtHR's doctrines: references for informational purposes; references to support an autonomous interpretation; legal transplants; and references in the context of evolutive interpretation. EU law is relevant for both the determination of the scope of Convention rights and for the ECtHR's proportionality analysis, but EU law influence is not confined to the case law of the CJEU. It includes the full spectrum of EU legal materials. While it welcomes the ECtHR's engagement with developments at EU level, the article expresses a normative critique that is underpinned by a concern that the ECtHR's reasoning is often lacking in clarity and exposition of argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Review\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"804-825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2922462\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2922462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article identifies four distinct areas of EU law influence on the ECtHR's doctrines: references for informational purposes; references to support an autonomous interpretation; legal transplants; and references in the context of evolutive interpretation. EU law is relevant for both the determination of the scope of Convention rights and for the ECtHR's proportionality analysis, but EU law influence is not confined to the case law of the CJEU. It includes the full spectrum of EU legal materials. While it welcomes the ECtHR's engagement with developments at EU level, the article expresses a normative critique that is underpinned by a concern that the ECtHR's reasoning is often lacking in clarity and exposition of argument.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
