间接供热装置热油和纳米流体热性能模拟研究

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/ciceq191011023o
Li Da, S. Mattedi
{"title":"间接供热装置热油和纳米流体热性能模拟研究","authors":"Li Da, S. Mattedi","doi":"10.2298/ciceq191011023o","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the thermal performance of four different heat transfer fluids in a hot oil system located in a paraffin hydrotreatment and fractionation plant of a petroleum refinery. The software Petro-SIM? (KBC- -Yokogawa) was employed to elaborate steady-state simulations intended to compare the heat transfer fluid currently used (eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide) and three fluids proposed as substitutes: paraffin oil (namely n-C13 +) produced in the same industrial unit, a nanofluid of eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide and copper at a 6% volume fraction, and a CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluid at a 6% volume fraction. The results showed that n-C13 + was the only heat transfer fluid that could replace the eutectic diphenyl oxide/biphenyl in the system under analysis since it absorbed the heat duty of 13.79 Gcal/h, which exceeded the thermal energy of 10.57 Gcal/h absorbed by the heat transfer fluid currently used at the same operating parameters. The Cu/eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide and CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluids presented lower heat duty than the energy needed for the operation of the hot oil system, which was 8.31 and 8.51 Gcal/h, respectively.","PeriodicalId":9716,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal performance evaluation of hot oils and nanofluids by simulation of an indirect heating plant\",\"authors\":\"Li Da, S. Mattedi\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/ciceq191011023o\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to analyze the thermal performance of four different heat transfer fluids in a hot oil system located in a paraffin hydrotreatment and fractionation plant of a petroleum refinery. The software Petro-SIM? (KBC- -Yokogawa) was employed to elaborate steady-state simulations intended to compare the heat transfer fluid currently used (eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide) and three fluids proposed as substitutes: paraffin oil (namely n-C13 +) produced in the same industrial unit, a nanofluid of eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide and copper at a 6% volume fraction, and a CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluid at a 6% volume fraction. The results showed that n-C13 + was the only heat transfer fluid that could replace the eutectic diphenyl oxide/biphenyl in the system under analysis since it absorbed the heat duty of 13.79 Gcal/h, which exceeded the thermal energy of 10.57 Gcal/h absorbed by the heat transfer fluid currently used at the same operating parameters. The Cu/eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide and CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluids presented lower heat duty than the energy needed for the operation of the hot oil system, which was 8.31 and 8.51 Gcal/h, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/ciceq191011023o\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ciceq191011023o","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析某炼油厂石蜡加氢分馏装置热油系统中4种不同传热流体的热性能。Petro-SIM?(KBC- - yokogawa)进行了稳态模拟,旨在比较目前使用的传热流体(联苯和二苯基氧化物共晶)和三种被提议作为替代品的流体:同一工业装置生产的石蜡油(即n-C13 +)、联苯和二苯基氧化物与铜共晶的纳米流体(体积分数为6%)和CuO/聚二甲基硅氧烷纳米流体(体积分数为6%)。结果表明:在分析体系中,n-C13 +是唯一可以取代共晶氧化二苯/联苯的传热流体,其吸收的热负荷为13.79 Gcal/h,超过了目前使用的传热流体在相同操作参数下吸收的热能10.57 Gcal/h。联苯和二苯基氧化物的Cu/共晶纳米流体和CuO/聚二甲基硅氧烷纳米流体的热负荷较低,分别为8.31和8.51 Gcal/h。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thermal performance evaluation of hot oils and nanofluids by simulation of an indirect heating plant
This paper aims to analyze the thermal performance of four different heat transfer fluids in a hot oil system located in a paraffin hydrotreatment and fractionation plant of a petroleum refinery. The software Petro-SIM? (KBC- -Yokogawa) was employed to elaborate steady-state simulations intended to compare the heat transfer fluid currently used (eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide) and three fluids proposed as substitutes: paraffin oil (namely n-C13 +) produced in the same industrial unit, a nanofluid of eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide and copper at a 6% volume fraction, and a CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluid at a 6% volume fraction. The results showed that n-C13 + was the only heat transfer fluid that could replace the eutectic diphenyl oxide/biphenyl in the system under analysis since it absorbed the heat duty of 13.79 Gcal/h, which exceeded the thermal energy of 10.57 Gcal/h absorbed by the heat transfer fluid currently used at the same operating parameters. The Cu/eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide and CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluids presented lower heat duty than the energy needed for the operation of the hot oil system, which was 8.31 and 8.51 Gcal/h, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly
Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly CHEMISTRY, APPLIED-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal invites contributions to the following two main areas: • Applied Chemistry dealing with the application of basic chemical sciences to industry • Chemical Engineering dealing with the chemical and biochemical conversion of raw materials into different products as well as the design and operation of plants and equipment. The Journal welcomes contributions focused on: Chemical and Biochemical Engineering [...] Process Systems Engineering[...] Environmental Chemical and Process Engineering[...] Materials Synthesis and Processing[...] Food and Bioproducts Processing[...] Process Technology[...]
期刊最新文献
Bioaccumulation and biosorption study of heavy metals removal by Cyanobacteria Nostoc sp. Biogas production and greenhouse gas mitigation using fish waste from Bragança/Brazil Hot-air drying and degradation kinetics of bioactive compounds of gilaburu (Viburnum opulus L.) fruit Catalytic performance of desilicated HZSM-12 for benzylation reaction of benzene with benzyl alcohol Internal model control of cumene process using analytical rules and evolutionary computation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1