转型经济体的收入不平等:克罗地亚、塞尔维亚和斯洛文尼亚的比较分析

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economic Annals Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2298/eka1923039z
Jelena Žarković-Rakić, G. Krstić, N. Oruč, W. Bartlett
{"title":"转型经济体的收入不平等:克罗地亚、塞尔维亚和斯洛文尼亚的比较分析","authors":"Jelena Žarković-Rakić, G. Krstić, N. Oruč, W. Bartlett","doi":"10.2298/eka1923039z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the relationship between income inequality and different welfare state trajectories that three countries of the former Yugoslavia ?south of the Alps? have taken over the three decades since the breakup of the country in 1990. It is remarkable that three countries emerging from a common (socialist) system have experienced diametrically opposing outcomes regarding inequality. Slovenia has one of the lowest levels of income inequality in Europe, Croatia an average level of inequality, and Serbia one of the highest levels. The paper first examines the extent and nature of income inequality in the three countries before examining the determining causes of inequality, rooted in the evaluation of labour markets, education systems, and tax-benefit systems. It concludes that the divergent transition paths have created the different inequality outcomes observed in the three countries. This article has been corrected. Link to the correction 10.2298/EKA2024129E","PeriodicalId":35023,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income inequality in transition economies: A comparative analysis of Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Žarković-Rakić, G. Krstić, N. Oruč, W. Bartlett\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/eka1923039z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the relationship between income inequality and different welfare state trajectories that three countries of the former Yugoslavia ?south of the Alps? have taken over the three decades since the breakup of the country in 1990. It is remarkable that three countries emerging from a common (socialist) system have experienced diametrically opposing outcomes regarding inequality. Slovenia has one of the lowest levels of income inequality in Europe, Croatia an average level of inequality, and Serbia one of the highest levels. The paper first examines the extent and nature of income inequality in the three countries before examining the determining causes of inequality, rooted in the evaluation of labour markets, education systems, and tax-benefit systems. It concludes that the divergent transition paths have created the different inequality outcomes observed in the three countries. This article has been corrected. Link to the correction 10.2298/EKA2024129E\",\"PeriodicalId\":35023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Annals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/eka1923039z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/eka1923039z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了前南斯拉夫阿尔卑斯以南三个国家收入不平等与不同福利国家发展轨迹之间的关系。在1990年国家解体后的三十年里,值得注意的是,从共同(社会主义)制度中崛起的三个国家在不平等方面的结果截然相反。斯洛文尼亚是欧洲收入不平等程度最低的国家之一,克罗地亚是平均水平,塞尔维亚是收入不平等程度最高的国家之一。本文首先考察了这三个国家收入不平等的程度和性质,然后考察了不平等的决定性原因,这些原因植根于对劳动力市场、教育系统和税收福利系统的评估。它的结论是,不同的转型路径造成了在这三个国家观察到的不同的不平等结果。这篇文章已被更正。链接到更正10.2298/EKA2024129E
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Income inequality in transition economies: A comparative analysis of Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia
This paper investigates the relationship between income inequality and different welfare state trajectories that three countries of the former Yugoslavia ?south of the Alps? have taken over the three decades since the breakup of the country in 1990. It is remarkable that three countries emerging from a common (socialist) system have experienced diametrically opposing outcomes regarding inequality. Slovenia has one of the lowest levels of income inequality in Europe, Croatia an average level of inequality, and Serbia one of the highest levels. The paper first examines the extent and nature of income inequality in the three countries before examining the determining causes of inequality, rooted in the evaluation of labour markets, education systems, and tax-benefit systems. It concludes that the divergent transition paths have created the different inequality outcomes observed in the three countries. This article has been corrected. Link to the correction 10.2298/EKA2024129E
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Annals
Economic Annals Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Economic Annals is an academic journal that has been published on a quarterly basis since 1955, initially under its Serbian name of Ekonomski anali (EconLit). Since 2006 it has been published exclusively in English. It is published by the Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbia. The journal publishes research in all areas of economics. The Editorial Board welcomes contributions that explore economic issues in a comparative perspective with a focus on transition and emerging economies in Europe and around the world. The journal encourages the submission of original unpublished works, not under consideration by other journals or publications. All submitted papers undergo a double blind refereeing process. Authors are expected to follow standard publication procedures [Instructions to Authors], to recognise the values of the international academic community and to respect the journal’s Policy.
期刊最新文献
Remittances-finance-growth trilogy: Do remittance and financial development complement or substitute each other to affect growth in Nigeria? Analysing the Armey curve based on the Fourier cointegration approach for Turkey Egalitarianism and redistributive reform in Serbia after 2000 The effectiveness of bilateral investment treaties in attracting foreign direct investment: The case of Serbia Investigation of the sunspots and GDP nexus: The case of Balkan countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1