在可再生燃料标准存在下的收入中性污染税

IF 1.2 4区经济学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.22004/ag.econ.292327

Tristan Skolrud, Gregmar I. Galinato

{"title":"在可再生燃料标准存在下的收入中性污染税","authors":"Tristan Skolrud, Gregmar I. Galinato","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.292327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assess the welfare implications of a revenue-neutral tax in the presence of two Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) policies for cellulosic biofuels: the waiver credit and the input-ratio requirement. We extend the model of revenue-neutral taxation to allow for the taxation of a dirty input in an imperfectly competitive market while integrating RFS-specific policies. Simulations from Washington and Oregon indicate that a revenue-neutral tax raises welfare by 19%–21% but growth in cellulosic ethanol production is minimal, ranging from 0.6% to 1.5%. Pollution taxes, cellulosic ethanol production, and welfare are more responsive to the waiver credit than to the input-ratio requirement.","PeriodicalId":54890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"44 1","pages":"474-496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revenue-Neutral Pollution Taxes in the Presence of a Renewable Fuel Standard\",\"authors\":\"Tristan Skolrud, Gregmar I. Galinato\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/ag.econ.292327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We assess the welfare implications of a revenue-neutral tax in the presence of two Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) policies for cellulosic biofuels: the waiver credit and the input-ratio requirement. We extend the model of revenue-neutral taxation to allow for the taxation of a dirty input in an imperfectly competitive market while integrating RFS-specific policies. Simulations from Washington and Oregon indicate that a revenue-neutral tax raises welfare by 19%–21% but growth in cellulosic ethanol production is minimal, ranging from 0.6% to 1.5%. Pollution taxes, cellulosic ethanol production, and welfare are more responsive to the waiver credit than to the input-ratio requirement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"474-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.292327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.292327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了在纤维素生物燃料的两项可再生燃料标准(RFS)政策存在的情况下，收入中性税的福利影响:豁免信贷和投入比要求。我们扩展了收入中性税收模型，允许在不完全竞争市场中对污染投入征税，同时整合rfs特定政策。来自华盛顿州和俄勒冈州的模拟表明，收入中性的税收使福利提高了19%-21%，但纤维素乙醇生产的增长很小，在0.6% - 1.5%之间。污染税、纤维素乙醇生产和福利对豁免信贷的反应比对投入比要求的反应更大。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Revenue-Neutral Pollution Taxes in the Presence of a Renewable Fuel Standard

We assess the welfare implications of a revenue-neutral tax in the presence of two Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) policies for cellulosic biofuels: the waiver credit and the input-ratio requirement. We extend the model of revenue-neutral taxation to allow for the taxation of a dirty input in an imperfectly competitive market while integrating RFS-specific policies. Simulations from Washington and Oregon indicate that a revenue-neutral tax raises welfare by 19%–21% but growth in cellulosic ethanol production is minimal, ranging from 0.6% to 1.5%. Pollution taxes, cellulosic ethanol production, and welfare are more responsive to the waiver credit than to the input-ratio requirement.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 社会科学-农业经济与政策

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

7.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>36 weeks

期刊介绍： The mission of the Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics is to publish creative and scholarly economic studies in agriculture, natural resources, and related areas. Manuscripts dealing with the economics of food and agriculture, natural resources and the environment, human resources, and rural development issues are especially encouraged. The Journal provides a forum for topics of interest to those performing economic research as well as to those involved with economic policy and education. Submission of comments on articles previously published in the Journal is welcomed.