确定设置裕度的脑肿瘤辐照优化

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/ntrp2203235z
Valerija Zager-Marcius, L. Dolenc, U. Smrdel
{"title":"确定设置裕度的脑肿瘤辐照优化","authors":"Valerija Zager-Marcius, L. Dolenc, U. Smrdel","doi":"10.2298/ntrp2203235z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the excising margin of the clinical tumor volume and planning target volume correspond with calculated radiation margin based on systematic errors, and definition of radiation margins of individual brain lobes. This research was a retrospective cross-sectional study. We checked the systematic errors and calculated their average and the size of radiation margins. The average systematic errors were calculated in four directions: lateral, longitudinal, vertical, and rotation. The largest average systematic error was calculated in the lateral direction in the cerebellar area, and the error was also statistically significant(p < 0.05). In rotational direction we notice the statistically significant difference in frontal lopbe (p = 0.037), and cerebellar area (p = 0.002). The largest safety margin, as measured by the apverage systematic errors, is requirped for irradiation of the cerebellum. The safety margin size of 6.94 mm was calculated according to the formula of Van Herk. However, the smallest safety margin can be used for irradiation of the occipital lobe of the brain, namely 4.85 mm. The linear regression results that only cerebellar lesions affect lateral displacements. Based on our calculation of the mean systematic errors, we estimate that the clinical target volume - planning target volume safety margin can't be reduced further from the current 5 mm to a size of 3 mm without the use of image guided radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":49734,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of brain tumours irradiation determining the set-up margin\",\"authors\":\"Valerija Zager-Marcius, L. Dolenc, U. Smrdel\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/ntrp2203235z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the excising margin of the clinical tumor volume and planning target volume correspond with calculated radiation margin based on systematic errors, and definition of radiation margins of individual brain lobes. This research was a retrospective cross-sectional study. We checked the systematic errors and calculated their average and the size of radiation margins. The average systematic errors were calculated in four directions: lateral, longitudinal, vertical, and rotation. The largest average systematic error was calculated in the lateral direction in the cerebellar area, and the error was also statistically significant(p < 0.05). In rotational direction we notice the statistically significant difference in frontal lopbe (p = 0.037), and cerebellar area (p = 0.002). The largest safety margin, as measured by the apverage systematic errors, is requirped for irradiation of the cerebellum. The safety margin size of 6.94 mm was calculated according to the formula of Van Herk. However, the smallest safety margin can be used for irradiation of the occipital lobe of the brain, namely 4.85 mm. The linear regression results that only cerebellar lesions affect lateral displacements. Based on our calculation of the mean systematic errors, we estimate that the clinical target volume - planning target volume safety margin can't be reduced further from the current 5 mm to a size of 3 mm without the use of image guided radiotherapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/ntrp2203235z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ntrp2203235z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估临床肿瘤体积和计划靶体积的切除边界是否与基于系统误差计算的辐射边界相对应,并定义单个脑叶的辐射边界。本研究为回顾性横断面研究。我们检查了系统误差,并计算了它们的平均值和辐射边际的大小。在横向、纵向、垂直和旋转四个方向上计算平均系统误差。平均系统误差在小脑区外侧方向计算最大,误差也有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在旋转方向上,我们注意到额叶(p = 0.037)和小脑区域(p = 0.002)的统计学差异具有统计学意义。用平均系统误差测量的最大安全裕度要求照射小脑。安全裕度尺寸为6.94 mm,根据Van Herk公式计算。而脑枕叶照射的安全裕度最小,为4.85 mm。线性回归结果表明,只有小脑病变影响外侧位移。根据我们对平均系统误差的计算,我们估计在不使用图像引导放疗的情况下,临床靶体积-规划靶体积安全余量不能从目前的5 mm进一步减小到3 mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimization of brain tumours irradiation determining the set-up margin
The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the excising margin of the clinical tumor volume and planning target volume correspond with calculated radiation margin based on systematic errors, and definition of radiation margins of individual brain lobes. This research was a retrospective cross-sectional study. We checked the systematic errors and calculated their average and the size of radiation margins. The average systematic errors were calculated in four directions: lateral, longitudinal, vertical, and rotation. The largest average systematic error was calculated in the lateral direction in the cerebellar area, and the error was also statistically significant(p < 0.05). In rotational direction we notice the statistically significant difference in frontal lopbe (p = 0.037), and cerebellar area (p = 0.002). The largest safety margin, as measured by the apverage systematic errors, is requirped for irradiation of the cerebellum. The safety margin size of 6.94 mm was calculated according to the formula of Van Herk. However, the smallest safety margin can be used for irradiation of the occipital lobe of the brain, namely 4.85 mm. The linear regression results that only cerebellar lesions affect lateral displacements. Based on our calculation of the mean systematic errors, we estimate that the clinical target volume - planning target volume safety margin can't be reduced further from the current 5 mm to a size of 3 mm without the use of image guided radiotherapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection
Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
41.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection is an international scientific journal covering the wide range of disciplines involved in nuclear science and technology as well as in the field of radiation protection. The journal is open for scientific papers, short papers, review articles, and technical papers dealing with nuclear power, research reactors, accelerators, nuclear materials, waste management, radiation measurements, and environmental problems. However, basic reactor physics and design, particle and radiation transport theory, and development of numerical methods and codes will also be important aspects of the editorial policy.
期刊最新文献
Study on kinetic parameters of pebble bed reactor with TRISO duplex fuel Influence of electromagnetic pollution of the electron beam generator and high-energy radioactive source on the memory components Influence of ionizing radiation on the stochasticity of overvoltage protection at low, medium, and high voltage levels in gas surge arresters Assessing radiation hazards associated with natural radioactivity in building materials in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Study on occupational exposure of medical staff caused by induced radioactivity in the treatment room of medical heavy-ion facility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1