历史学家与大屠杀归还:个人经历与思考

Q3 Social Sciences Issues in Legal Scholarship Pub Date : 2006-05-04 DOI:10.2202/1539-8323.1080
G. Feldman
{"title":"历史学家与大屠杀归还:个人经历与思考","authors":"G. Feldman","doi":"10.2202/1539-8323.1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before turning to the subject at hand, I would like to express my appreciation to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for making this wonderful year possible, for organizing this symposium, and for inviting me to speak to so distinguished an audience. I find myself in the odd situation of being the only humanist-social scientist among the four speakers and the only person who is working on Germany and Central Europe. As is so often the case, historians feel themselves a bit like impostors when they are referred to as \"scientists.\" And while for good historical reasons that can be explained-both natural scientists and scholars of the humanities and social sciences are all referred to as Wissenschaftler in German-some find what we have to offer more akin to \"unorganized soft matter\" than to \"real science.\" Nevertheless, historians often do deal with problems of very contemporary relevance that affect us all and become involved in political issues and debates, and this has been the case with myself during the past decade. I have a special interest in German business history, a field that has been at the center of recent efforts to deal with the problems of the role of business in the National Socialist dictatorship between 1933 and 1945 and with the questions of restitution and compensation for Jews-but not only Jews-for property and various assets stolen by the Nazi regime and for forced labor. Historians do not normally become involved in such \"hot\" issues directly-the Owl of Minerva, in Hegel's famous phrase, normally being heard at sunset-and I thought it might be of interest to discuss some of my experiences in the \"real world\" of a historian suddenly caught up in these emotionally charged and highly political issues. As some of you may know, the issue of Holocaust assets came to the fore in 1996-1997 thanks to charges emanating from Jewish groups angry about unpaid Swiss bank accounts, the mobilization of the U.S. government to put pressure on the Swiss to open their banking files, and the mobilization of various American legislative and regulatory authorities to put the heat on the Swiss. The","PeriodicalId":34921,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1539-8323.1080","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Historian and Holocaust Restitution: Personal Experiences and Reflections\",\"authors\":\"G. Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1539-8323.1080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before turning to the subject at hand, I would like to express my appreciation to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for making this wonderful year possible, for organizing this symposium, and for inviting me to speak to so distinguished an audience. I find myself in the odd situation of being the only humanist-social scientist among the four speakers and the only person who is working on Germany and Central Europe. As is so often the case, historians feel themselves a bit like impostors when they are referred to as \\\"scientists.\\\" And while for good historical reasons that can be explained-both natural scientists and scholars of the humanities and social sciences are all referred to as Wissenschaftler in German-some find what we have to offer more akin to \\\"unorganized soft matter\\\" than to \\\"real science.\\\" Nevertheless, historians often do deal with problems of very contemporary relevance that affect us all and become involved in political issues and debates, and this has been the case with myself during the past decade. I have a special interest in German business history, a field that has been at the center of recent efforts to deal with the problems of the role of business in the National Socialist dictatorship between 1933 and 1945 and with the questions of restitution and compensation for Jews-but not only Jews-for property and various assets stolen by the Nazi regime and for forced labor. Historians do not normally become involved in such \\\"hot\\\" issues directly-the Owl of Minerva, in Hegel's famous phrase, normally being heard at sunset-and I thought it might be of interest to discuss some of my experiences in the \\\"real world\\\" of a historian suddenly caught up in these emotionally charged and highly political issues. As some of you may know, the issue of Holocaust assets came to the fore in 1996-1997 thanks to charges emanating from Jewish groups angry about unpaid Swiss bank accounts, the mobilization of the U.S. government to put pressure on the Swiss to open their banking files, and the mobilization of various American legislative and regulatory authorities to put the heat on the Swiss. The\",\"PeriodicalId\":34921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Legal Scholarship\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1539-8323.1080\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Legal Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在进入正题之前,我想对亚历山大·冯·洪堡基金会表示感谢,感谢他们使这一美好的一年成为可能,感谢他们组织了这次研讨会,并邀请我向如此尊贵的听众讲话。我发现自己处于一种奇怪的境地:在四位演讲者中,我是唯一一位人文主义社会科学家,也是唯一一位研究德国和中欧的人。通常情况下,当历史学家被称为“科学家”时,他们会觉得自己有点像骗子。由于历史原因,这是可以解释的——自然科学家和人文社会科学的学者在德语中都被称为Wissenschaftler——一些人发现我们所提供的更像是“无组织的软物质”,而不是“真正的科学”。然而,历史学家经常处理影响我们所有人的当代相关问题,并涉及政治问题和辩论,我自己在过去十年就是这种情况。我对德国商业史特别感兴趣,这一领域最近一直是研究1933年至1945年国家社会主义独裁时期商业所扮演的角色,以及犹太人(但不仅仅是犹太人)被纳粹政权窃取的财产和各种资产以及强迫劳动的归还和赔偿问题的中心。历史学家通常不会直接参与这样的“热点”问题——黑格尔的名言“密涅瓦的猫头鹰”通常是在日落时听到的——我想讨论一下我在“现实世界”中的一些经历可能会很有趣,因为一个历史学家突然陷入了这些充满情感和高度政治的问题中。你们中的一些人可能知道,大屠杀资产的问题在1996-1997年出现,这要感谢犹太人团体对未付瑞士银行账户的愤怒,美国政府动员向瑞士人施压,要求他们公开银行文件,以及美国各种立法和监管机构动员向瑞士人施压。的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Historian and Holocaust Restitution: Personal Experiences and Reflections
Before turning to the subject at hand, I would like to express my appreciation to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for making this wonderful year possible, for organizing this symposium, and for inviting me to speak to so distinguished an audience. I find myself in the odd situation of being the only humanist-social scientist among the four speakers and the only person who is working on Germany and Central Europe. As is so often the case, historians feel themselves a bit like impostors when they are referred to as "scientists." And while for good historical reasons that can be explained-both natural scientists and scholars of the humanities and social sciences are all referred to as Wissenschaftler in German-some find what we have to offer more akin to "unorganized soft matter" than to "real science." Nevertheless, historians often do deal with problems of very contemporary relevance that affect us all and become involved in political issues and debates, and this has been the case with myself during the past decade. I have a special interest in German business history, a field that has been at the center of recent efforts to deal with the problems of the role of business in the National Socialist dictatorship between 1933 and 1945 and with the questions of restitution and compensation for Jews-but not only Jews-for property and various assets stolen by the Nazi regime and for forced labor. Historians do not normally become involved in such "hot" issues directly-the Owl of Minerva, in Hegel's famous phrase, normally being heard at sunset-and I thought it might be of interest to discuss some of my experiences in the "real world" of a historian suddenly caught up in these emotionally charged and highly political issues. As some of you may know, the issue of Holocaust assets came to the fore in 1996-1997 thanks to charges emanating from Jewish groups angry about unpaid Swiss bank accounts, the mobilization of the U.S. government to put pressure on the Swiss to open their banking files, and the mobilization of various American legislative and regulatory authorities to put the heat on the Swiss. The
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Legal Scholarship
Issues in Legal Scholarship Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues in Legal Scholarship presents cutting-edge legal and policy research using the format of online peer-reviewed symposia. The journal’s emphasis on interdisciplinary work and legal theory extends to recent symposium topics such as Single-Sex Marriage, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, and Catastrophic Risks. The symposia systematically address emerging issues of great significance, offering ongoing scholarship of interest to a wide range of policy and legal researchers. Online publication makes it possible for other researchers to find the best and latest quickly, as well as to join in further discussion. Each symposium aims to be a living forum with ongoing publications and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Current understanding of extracellular vesicle homing/tropism. Tort Policy in a Plural Context: Pathways Towards Objective Liability in UAE Tort Law Eliciting Best Evidence from a Child Witness: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and India Bumped Redundancy and the Range of Reasonable Responses: To what Extent, if any, should Employers Consider Bumping? Life after Mirab v Mentor Graphics Limited UKEAT/0172/17DA Deconstructing the Opacity of Pari Passu Clause as a Pathway to Interpretative Clarity: Guidepost to Optimal Adjudicatory Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1