{"title":"互联网路演:带个人投资者在信息高速公路上兜风","authors":"Li Yi","doi":"10.2307/1373136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet has prompted an evolution (indeed, a revolution) within securities transactions that has markedly changed the face of securities regulation. The ubiquitous nature of this information network has caused deviations from and alterations within the traditional business model. These changes, many of which are ongoing, include a movement toward a different type of public offering as well as a reassessment and redistribution of risk for market players. Consequently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) has been forced to reevaluate some of its rules and regulations. In particular, the SEC has had to learn how to utilize Internet resources without compromising either of its dual objectives of promoting market efficiency and protecting investors.' As a result, the SEC is now fighting a battle on two fronts. On the one hand, the Commission is battling broker-dealers, who feel that the SEC's attempts to \"level the playing field\" by imposing strict regulations on information disclosure is too stringent and is actually hampering market efficiency.2 On the other hand, the SEC is at odds with investors, who feel that the SEC's paternalistic approach is suffocating them in","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"243-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1373136","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Road Shows on the Internet: Taking Individual Investors for a Ride on the Information Highway\",\"authors\":\"Li Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1373136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Internet has prompted an evolution (indeed, a revolution) within securities transactions that has markedly changed the face of securities regulation. The ubiquitous nature of this information network has caused deviations from and alterations within the traditional business model. These changes, many of which are ongoing, include a movement toward a different type of public offering as well as a reassessment and redistribution of risk for market players. Consequently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) has been forced to reevaluate some of its rules and regulations. In particular, the SEC has had to learn how to utilize Internet resources without compromising either of its dual objectives of promoting market efficiency and protecting investors.' As a result, the SEC is now fighting a battle on two fronts. On the one hand, the Commission is battling broker-dealers, who feel that the SEC's attempts to \\\"level the playing field\\\" by imposing strict regulations on information disclosure is too stringent and is actually hampering market efficiency.2 On the other hand, the SEC is at odds with investors, who feel that the SEC's paternalistic approach is suffocating them in\",\"PeriodicalId\":47625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Duke Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"243-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1373136\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Duke Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1373136\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1373136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Road Shows on the Internet: Taking Individual Investors for a Ride on the Information Highway
The Internet has prompted an evolution (indeed, a revolution) within securities transactions that has markedly changed the face of securities regulation. The ubiquitous nature of this information network has caused deviations from and alterations within the traditional business model. These changes, many of which are ongoing, include a movement toward a different type of public offering as well as a reassessment and redistribution of risk for market players. Consequently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) has been forced to reevaluate some of its rules and regulations. In particular, the SEC has had to learn how to utilize Internet resources without compromising either of its dual objectives of promoting market efficiency and protecting investors.' As a result, the SEC is now fighting a battle on two fronts. On the one hand, the Commission is battling broker-dealers, who feel that the SEC's attempts to "level the playing field" by imposing strict regulations on information disclosure is too stringent and is actually hampering market efficiency.2 On the other hand, the SEC is at odds with investors, who feel that the SEC's paternalistic approach is suffocating them in
期刊介绍:
The first issue of what was to become the Duke Law Journal was published in March 1951 as the Duke Bar Journal. Created to provide a medium for student expression, the Duke Bar Journal consisted entirely of student-written and student-edited work until 1953, when it began publishing faculty contributions. To reflect the inclusion of faculty scholarship, the Duke Bar Journal became the Duke Law Journal in 1957. In 1969, the Journal published its inaugural Administrative Law Symposium issue, a tradition that continues today. Volume 1 of the Duke Bar Journal spanned two issues and 259 pages. In 1959, the Journal grew to four issues and 649 pages, growing again in 1970 to six issues and 1263 pages. Today, the Duke Law Journal publishes eight issues per volume. Our staff is committed to the purpose set forth in our constitution: to publish legal writing of superior quality. We seek to publish a collection of outstanding scholarship from established legal writers, up-and-coming authors, and our own student editors.