数学活动中的亲和力:培育民主学习共同体

Q4 Social Sciences Journal of Urban Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2014-12-10 DOI:10.21423/jume-v7i2a208
Tesha Sengupta-Irving
{"title":"数学活动中的亲和力:培育民主学习共同体","authors":"Tesha Sengupta-Irving","doi":"10.21423/jume-v7i2a208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author demonstrates how a broader view of what shapes affinity is ideologically and practically linked to creating democratic learning communities. Specifically, the author explores how a teacher employed complex instruction (an equity pedagogy) with her ethnically and racially diverse students in the \"lowest track\" Algebra I course. Sociometric network analyses used to model peer relationships revealed an affinity among three students that could not be explained by shared attributes or history (e.g., race or gender). Through field note analyses, the author argues these students' affinity was forged through shared mathematical activity--what she terms a workship. This workship reflected equitable relationships born of diverse youth learning to work together by working together. The author discusses implications of the workship for teachers and researchers, as well as the constraints that stratified mathematics programs can place on classroom-based efforts to advance equity.","PeriodicalId":36435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affinity through Mathematical Activity: Cultivating Democratic Learning Communities\",\"authors\":\"Tesha Sengupta-Irving\",\"doi\":\"10.21423/jume-v7i2a208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the author demonstrates how a broader view of what shapes affinity is ideologically and practically linked to creating democratic learning communities. Specifically, the author explores how a teacher employed complex instruction (an equity pedagogy) with her ethnically and racially diverse students in the \\\"lowest track\\\" Algebra I course. Sociometric network analyses used to model peer relationships revealed an affinity among three students that could not be explained by shared attributes or history (e.g., race or gender). Through field note analyses, the author argues these students' affinity was forged through shared mathematical activity--what she terms a workship. This workship reflected equitable relationships born of diverse youth learning to work together by working together. The author discusses implications of the workship for teachers and researchers, as well as the constraints that stratified mathematics programs can place on classroom-based efforts to advance equity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v7i2a208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v7i2a208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在这篇文章中,作者展示了一个更广泛的观点是如何塑造亲和力的意识形态和实践与创建民主学习社区联系在一起的。具体而言,作者探讨了一位教师如何在“最低轨道”代数I课程中对她的种族和种族多样化的学生采用复杂的教学(一种公平教学法)。用于模拟同伴关系的社会计量学网络分析显示,三个学生之间的亲和力无法用共同的属性或历史(例如,种族或性别)来解释。通过实地笔记分析,作者认为这些学生的亲和力是通过共同的数学活动形成的——她称之为工作关系。这种工作关系反映了不同青年通过共同努力学习共同努力而产生的公平关系。作者讨论了工作关系对教师和研究人员的影响,以及分层数学课程可能对以课堂为基础的促进公平的努力施加的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Affinity through Mathematical Activity: Cultivating Democratic Learning Communities
In this article, the author demonstrates how a broader view of what shapes affinity is ideologically and practically linked to creating democratic learning communities. Specifically, the author explores how a teacher employed complex instruction (an equity pedagogy) with her ethnically and racially diverse students in the "lowest track" Algebra I course. Sociometric network analyses used to model peer relationships revealed an affinity among three students that could not be explained by shared attributes or history (e.g., race or gender). Through field note analyses, the author argues these students' affinity was forged through shared mathematical activity--what she terms a workship. This workship reflected equitable relationships born of diverse youth learning to work together by working together. The author discusses implications of the workship for teachers and researchers, as well as the constraints that stratified mathematics programs can place on classroom-based efforts to advance equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trip to Guatemala The Role of Technology in Enhancing Urban Mathematics Education Educational Aspirations of Diverse Groups among Undergraduate Statistics Majors Integration of ethnomathematics in teaching geometry: a systematic review and bibliometric report Design Considerations for Facilitating Equitable Participation in an Ethical Data Science Course for High School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1