A. Ramanathan, N. A. Rosedee, S. A. Edwer, E. P. John, K. Palaniswany, Z. A. Bakar
{"title":"自体荧光成像在老年机构受试者口腔黏膜病变检测中的应用","authors":"A. Ramanathan, N. A. Rosedee, S. A. Edwer, E. P. John, K. Palaniswany, Z. A. Bakar","doi":"10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in elderly population is 22.8% to 61.6%. Conventional oral examination (COE) is usually carried out to detect oral mucosal lesions (OML). However, new diagnostic aids have been introduced to improve OML detection. This study aimed to determine the utility of autofluorescence (AF) imaging in detecting OML from normal oral mucosa and its anatomic variation among institutionalised elderly Malaysian when compared with COE. Fifty subjects randomly selected from 9 nursing homes and COE and AF imaging using VELscope Vx, (LED Dental, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) were carried out. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of AF imaging were calculated. From the study, fifteen subjects had normal oral mucosa, 15 anatomic variations and 36 lesions were identified. The sensitivity and specificity of AF imaging were 100% and 70% whereas the PPV and NPV were 80% and 100% respectively. The accuracy of AF imaging was 86.37% when compared to COE. In conclusion AF imaging was able to detect OML and differentiate them from normal oral mucosa. However it has limited usefulness in differentiating between these lesions. This study however, was able to detail the AF imaging profile of normal oral mucosa, its normal variants and some common reactive or infective lesions which can be used in future OML studies as comparison to oral potentially malignant lesions.","PeriodicalId":75515,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dentistry","volume":"21 1","pages":"6-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UTILITY OF AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING IN THE DETECTION OF ORAL MUCOSAL LESIONS IN ELDERLY INSTITUTIONALISED SUBJECTS\",\"authors\":\"A. Ramanathan, N. A. Rosedee, S. A. Edwer, E. P. John, K. Palaniswany, Z. A. Bakar\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in elderly population is 22.8% to 61.6%. Conventional oral examination (COE) is usually carried out to detect oral mucosal lesions (OML). However, new diagnostic aids have been introduced to improve OML detection. This study aimed to determine the utility of autofluorescence (AF) imaging in detecting OML from normal oral mucosa and its anatomic variation among institutionalised elderly Malaysian when compared with COE. Fifty subjects randomly selected from 9 nursing homes and COE and AF imaging using VELscope Vx, (LED Dental, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) were carried out. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of AF imaging were calculated. From the study, fifteen subjects had normal oral mucosa, 15 anatomic variations and 36 lesions were identified. The sensitivity and specificity of AF imaging were 100% and 70% whereas the PPV and NPV were 80% and 100% respectively. The accuracy of AF imaging was 86.37% when compared to COE. In conclusion AF imaging was able to detect OML and differentiate them from normal oral mucosa. However it has limited usefulness in differentiating between these lesions. This study however, was able to detail the AF imaging profile of normal oral mucosa, its normal variants and some common reactive or infective lesions which can be used in future OML studies as comparison to oral potentially malignant lesions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"6-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
老年人口腔黏膜病变患病率为22.8% ~ 61.6%。常规口腔检查(COE)通常用于检测口腔黏膜病变(OML)。然而,新的诊断辅助工具已经被引入以提高OML的检测。本研究旨在确定自体荧光(AF)成像在检测正常口腔黏膜OML中的效用,以及与COE相比,在马来西亚机构老年人中OML的解剖变异。从9家养老院随机选择50名受试者,使用VELscope Vx (LED Dental, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada)进行COE和AF成像。计算AF成像的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)及准确性。本研究中,口腔黏膜正常15例,解剖变异15例,病变36例。AF成像的灵敏度和特异性分别为100%和70%,而PPV和NPV分别为80%和100%。与COE相比,AF成像准确率为86.37%。综上所述,AF显像能够发现OML并与正常口腔黏膜进行鉴别。然而,它在区分这些病变方面的作用有限。然而,这项研究能够详细描述正常口腔黏膜的AF成像特征,其正常变异和一些常见的反应性或感染性病变,可用于未来的OML研究,将其与口腔潜在恶性病变进行比较。
UTILITY OF AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING IN THE DETECTION OF ORAL MUCOSAL LESIONS IN ELDERLY INSTITUTIONALISED SUBJECTS
The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in elderly population is 22.8% to 61.6%. Conventional oral examination (COE) is usually carried out to detect oral mucosal lesions (OML). However, new diagnostic aids have been introduced to improve OML detection. This study aimed to determine the utility of autofluorescence (AF) imaging in detecting OML from normal oral mucosa and its anatomic variation among institutionalised elderly Malaysian when compared with COE. Fifty subjects randomly selected from 9 nursing homes and COE and AF imaging using VELscope Vx, (LED Dental, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) were carried out. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of AF imaging were calculated. From the study, fifteen subjects had normal oral mucosa, 15 anatomic variations and 36 lesions were identified. The sensitivity and specificity of AF imaging were 100% and 70% whereas the PPV and NPV were 80% and 100% respectively. The accuracy of AF imaging was 86.37% when compared to COE. In conclusion AF imaging was able to detect OML and differentiate them from normal oral mucosa. However it has limited usefulness in differentiating between these lesions. This study however, was able to detail the AF imaging profile of normal oral mucosa, its normal variants and some common reactive or infective lesions which can be used in future OML studies as comparison to oral potentially malignant lesions.