马来亚大学牙科学生对能力测试的认知

A. Na, Mohd Zulkiflee Ah, M. A. G. Gonzalez
{"title":"马来亚大学牙科学生对能力测试的认知","authors":"A. Na, Mohd Zulkiflee Ah, M. A. G. Gonzalez","doi":"10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was undertaken to explore the perception of Year IV and Year V University of Malaya dental students on different domains related to the competency based test (CBT). Methodology: A questionnaire was constructed and a survey conducted to explore the students’ perception on four domains related to the competency test: 1) benefits, 2) readiness to take, 3) timing and 4) lecturers’ supervision. Results: In general, majority of the students agreed that they benefited from the competency test and felt adequately prepared for each test. Students’ agreeing on feeling confident to sit for each test ranged from 70.0%- 81.4% for Year IV and 45.1%-70.4% for Year V. Majority of Year IV and Year V students perceived that the timing of each competency test was ‘just right’. There was a high response of ‘Strongly agree/agree’ to availability of patients for practice and assessment, self-confidence and amount and distribution of clinical session as factors affecting when they take the CBT. Majority of Year IV students agreed that the assessment of lecturers was consistent for each tests while Year V had a high percentage of ‘Neutral’ response. Students’ agreeing that there was feedback after the test was 52.9%-71.4% for Year IV and 31.0%-56.5% for Year V. ‘Strongly agree/agree’ response of 68.6%-75.0% for Year IV and 36.6%-52.1% for Year V was recorded for the level of supervision being the same after passing the test. Conclusion: Overall, majority of students gave positive perception towards CBT in relation to four main domains explored in this research.","PeriodicalId":75515,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dentistry","volume":"21 1","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University of Malaya Dental Students’ Perception on Competency Based Test\",\"authors\":\"A. Na, Mohd Zulkiflee Ah, M. A. G. Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was undertaken to explore the perception of Year IV and Year V University of Malaya dental students on different domains related to the competency based test (CBT). Methodology: A questionnaire was constructed and a survey conducted to explore the students’ perception on four domains related to the competency test: 1) benefits, 2) readiness to take, 3) timing and 4) lecturers’ supervision. Results: In general, majority of the students agreed that they benefited from the competency test and felt adequately prepared for each test. Students’ agreeing on feeling confident to sit for each test ranged from 70.0%- 81.4% for Year IV and 45.1%-70.4% for Year V. Majority of Year IV and Year V students perceived that the timing of each competency test was ‘just right’. There was a high response of ‘Strongly agree/agree’ to availability of patients for practice and assessment, self-confidence and amount and distribution of clinical session as factors affecting when they take the CBT. Majority of Year IV students agreed that the assessment of lecturers was consistent for each tests while Year V had a high percentage of ‘Neutral’ response. Students’ agreeing that there was feedback after the test was 52.9%-71.4% for Year IV and 31.0%-56.5% for Year V. ‘Strongly agree/agree’ response of 68.6%-75.0% for Year IV and 36.6%-52.1% for Year V was recorded for the level of supervision being the same after passing the test. Conclusion: Overall, majority of students gave positive perception towards CBT in relation to four main domains explored in this research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"27-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/ADUM.VOL21NO2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨马来亚大学四年级和五年级牙科学生对能力基础测试(CBT)相关的不同领域的看法。方法:采用问卷调查的方法,探讨学生对能力测试的四个方面的看法:1)利益,2)接受准备,3)时间和4)讲师的监督。结果:总的来说,大多数学生认为他们从能力测试中受益,并为每次测试做好了充分的准备。四年级和五年级的学生中,有信心参加每次考试的学生比例分别为70.0%- 81.4%和45.1%-70.4%。大多数四年级和五年级的学生认为每次能力测试的时机“刚刚好”。有很高的“强烈同意/同意”的反应,病人的实践和评估的可用性,自信和临床会议的数量和分布作为影响因素,当他们采取CBT。大多数四年级学生认为每次考试对讲师的评价是一致的,而五年级的学生有很高比例的“中性”反应。学生同意测试后有反馈的比例,四年级为52.9%-71.4%,五年级为31.0%-56.5%。“非常同意/同意”的比例,四年级为68.6%-75.0%,五年级为36.6%-52.1%,通过测试后的监督水平相同。结论:总体而言,大多数学生在本研究探索的四个主要领域对CBT给予了积极的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University of Malaya Dental Students’ Perception on Competency Based Test
This study was undertaken to explore the perception of Year IV and Year V University of Malaya dental students on different domains related to the competency based test (CBT). Methodology: A questionnaire was constructed and a survey conducted to explore the students’ perception on four domains related to the competency test: 1) benefits, 2) readiness to take, 3) timing and 4) lecturers’ supervision. Results: In general, majority of the students agreed that they benefited from the competency test and felt adequately prepared for each test. Students’ agreeing on feeling confident to sit for each test ranged from 70.0%- 81.4% for Year IV and 45.1%-70.4% for Year V. Majority of Year IV and Year V students perceived that the timing of each competency test was ‘just right’. There was a high response of ‘Strongly agree/agree’ to availability of patients for practice and assessment, self-confidence and amount and distribution of clinical session as factors affecting when they take the CBT. Majority of Year IV students agreed that the assessment of lecturers was consistent for each tests while Year V had a high percentage of ‘Neutral’ response. Students’ agreeing that there was feedback after the test was 52.9%-71.4% for Year IV and 31.0%-56.5% for Year V. ‘Strongly agree/agree’ response of 68.6%-75.0% for Year IV and 36.6%-52.1% for Year V was recorded for the level of supervision being the same after passing the test. Conclusion: Overall, majority of students gave positive perception towards CBT in relation to four main domains explored in this research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Profile of Patients with Maxillofacial Fracture in Emergency Department, Head-Neck Surgery Division, Dr. Soetomo Public Hospital Surabaya in 2020 Detection of Genetic Alterations in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) COVID-19 Impact on Dental Clinical Education: An Observational Narrative Misconceptions, Hesitancy and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccination in Dental Surgeons Working in A Teaching Dental Hospital, Peshawar Presence of the Periodontal Bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis in Patients With and Without Cancer: A Meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1