后天性脑损伤后驾驶能力的神经心理学与中介性驾驶综合评估

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psihologija Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/psi200408024c
Ursa Cizman-Staba, Tara Klun, Karmen Resnik-Robida
{"title":"后天性脑损伤后驾驶能力的神经心理学与中介性驾驶综合评估","authors":"Ursa Cizman-Staba, Tara Klun, Karmen Resnik-Robida","doi":"10.2298/psi200408024c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study was to evaluate predictor variables stemming from different assessment approaches (medical documentation, neuropsychological assessment, and Mediatester driving assessment) on patient's ability to drive (passing the practical driving test with a qualified instructor) following a TBI (traumatic brain injury) or a stroke. The study included 63 participants (54 males), aged 20 to 80 years (M = 44.4; SD = 16.7). Majority of participants suffered a TBI and 18 participants were included after an ischemic stroke. Patients who passed a driving test had significantly higher composite index on Comprehensive Trail- Making Test (medium or large effect size) compared to those who did not pass a driving test, or those who passed the driving test with limitations. The results on the 18-light reaction test (18 LRT) suggest that the reaction time could also play a role in predicting the ability to drive. The model with these two predictors, along with Glasgow Coma Scale, successfully classified 90 % of participants in two respectful groups; passed vs. did not pass a driving test/passed the driving test with limitations. The results suggest that neuropsychological and driving assessments that measure a range of cognitive abilities are better predictors of regaining the ability to drive after a TBI or stroke than separate cognitive abilities.","PeriodicalId":45301,"journal":{"name":"Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting factors of driving abilities after acquired brain injury through combined neuropsychological and Mediatester driving assessment\",\"authors\":\"Ursa Cizman-Staba, Tara Klun, Karmen Resnik-Robida\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/psi200408024c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the study was to evaluate predictor variables stemming from different assessment approaches (medical documentation, neuropsychological assessment, and Mediatester driving assessment) on patient's ability to drive (passing the practical driving test with a qualified instructor) following a TBI (traumatic brain injury) or a stroke. The study included 63 participants (54 males), aged 20 to 80 years (M = 44.4; SD = 16.7). Majority of participants suffered a TBI and 18 participants were included after an ischemic stroke. Patients who passed a driving test had significantly higher composite index on Comprehensive Trail- Making Test (medium or large effect size) compared to those who did not pass a driving test, or those who passed the driving test with limitations. The results on the 18-light reaction test (18 LRT) suggest that the reaction time could also play a role in predicting the ability to drive. The model with these two predictors, along with Glasgow Coma Scale, successfully classified 90 % of participants in two respectful groups; passed vs. did not pass a driving test/passed the driving test with limitations. The results suggest that neuropsychological and driving assessments that measure a range of cognitive abilities are better predictors of regaining the ability to drive after a TBI or stroke than separate cognitive abilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihologija\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/psi200408024c\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/psi200408024c","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估来自不同评估方法(医学文献、神经心理学评估和Mediatester驾驶评估)的预测变量,以评估TBI(创伤性脑损伤)或中风后患者的驾驶能力(在合格教练的指导下通过实际驾驶考试)。该研究包括63名参与者(54名男性),年龄在20至80岁之间(M = 44.4;Sd = 16.7)。大多数参与者遭受脑外伤,18名参与者在缺血性中风后被纳入研究。通过驾驶考试的患者在综合寻径测试上的综合指数(中或大效应量)明显高于未通过驾驶考试或通过限制驾驶考试的患者。18光反应测试(18 LRT)结果表明,反应时间对驾驶能力也有预测作用。具有这两个预测因子的模型,以及格拉斯哥昏迷量表,成功地将90%的参与者分为两组;通过驾驶考试/没有通过驾驶考试/有限制地通过了驾驶考试。结果表明,测量一系列认知能力的神经心理学和驾驶评估比单独的认知能力更能预测脑外伤或中风后恢复驾驶能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting factors of driving abilities after acquired brain injury through combined neuropsychological and Mediatester driving assessment
The objective of the study was to evaluate predictor variables stemming from different assessment approaches (medical documentation, neuropsychological assessment, and Mediatester driving assessment) on patient's ability to drive (passing the practical driving test with a qualified instructor) following a TBI (traumatic brain injury) or a stroke. The study included 63 participants (54 males), aged 20 to 80 years (M = 44.4; SD = 16.7). Majority of participants suffered a TBI and 18 participants were included after an ischemic stroke. Patients who passed a driving test had significantly higher composite index on Comprehensive Trail- Making Test (medium or large effect size) compared to those who did not pass a driving test, or those who passed the driving test with limitations. The results on the 18-light reaction test (18 LRT) suggest that the reaction time could also play a role in predicting the ability to drive. The model with these two predictors, along with Glasgow Coma Scale, successfully classified 90 % of participants in two respectful groups; passed vs. did not pass a driving test/passed the driving test with limitations. The results suggest that neuropsychological and driving assessments that measure a range of cognitive abilities are better predictors of regaining the ability to drive after a TBI or stroke than separate cognitive abilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psihologija
Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How do we see digital platform workers’ skill patterns? Evidence from south-eastern Europe Dark, dissatisfied and disengaged: Propensity towards marital infidelity, the dark triad, marital satisfaction and the mediating role of moral disengagement Analysis of the brain’s responses to the approach-avoidance behavior in architectural experience Job autonomy and employee strengths use: The roles of work engagement and job insecurity Self-criticism and self-compassion as mediators of the relationship between alexithymia and postpartum depressive symptoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1