圣西尔以来的溯及力与移民犯罪:司法约束的新迹象

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences University of Pennsylvania Law Review Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.2307/40041283
Van Wyke, D. Vashti
{"title":"圣西尔以来的溯及力与移民犯罪:司法约束的新迹象","authors":"Van Wyke, D. Vashti","doi":"10.2307/40041283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior to 1996 if a permanent resident was convicted of a crime that subjected her to deportation, she was often eligible to apply for a waiver of deportation, known as 212(c) relief. A waiver of deportation was granted under 212(c) if the immigrant could show substantial equitable ties with the United States, including a U.S. citizen spouse or children, U.S. business ownership, and employment in the United States. These 212(c) waivers were routinely granted in more than fifty percent of cases. In 1996, however, Congress overhauled immigration law through two bills—the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). A central goal of the bills was to facilitate the deportation of immigrants convicted of crimes. To do this, AEDPA restricted and IIRIRA entirely eliminated the 212(c) waiver mechanism, meaning that permanent residents convicted of a greatly expanded list of crimes would be automatically deported, regardless of how deeply connected they were with the United States.","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"154 1","pages":"741"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40041283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retroactivity and Immigrant Crimes since St. Cyr: Emerging Signs of Judicial Restraint\",\"authors\":\"Van Wyke, D. Vashti\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40041283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior to 1996 if a permanent resident was convicted of a crime that subjected her to deportation, she was often eligible to apply for a waiver of deportation, known as 212(c) relief. A waiver of deportation was granted under 212(c) if the immigrant could show substantial equitable ties with the United States, including a U.S. citizen spouse or children, U.S. business ownership, and employment in the United States. These 212(c) waivers were routinely granted in more than fifty percent of cases. In 1996, however, Congress overhauled immigration law through two bills—the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). A central goal of the bills was to facilitate the deportation of immigrants convicted of crimes. To do this, AEDPA restricted and IIRIRA entirely eliminated the 212(c) waiver mechanism, meaning that permanent residents convicted of a greatly expanded list of crimes would be automatically deported, regardless of how deeply connected they were with the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40041283\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40041283\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40041283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1996年以前,如果永久居民因犯罪被定罪而被驱逐出境,她通常有资格申请豁免驱逐出境,即212(c)救济。根据212(c),如果移民能够证明与美国有实质性的平等关系,包括美国公民配偶或子女,美国企业所有权和在美国就业,则可以豁免驱逐出境。这些212(c)豁免通常在50%以上的案件中获得批准。然而,1996年,国会通过两项法案——《1996年反恐怖主义和有效死刑法》(AEDPA)和《1996年非法移民改革和移民责任法》(IIRIRA)——对移民法进行了全面改革。这些法案的一个中心目标是促进将被定罪的移民驱逐出境。为此,AEDPA限制了212(c)豁免机制,而IIRIRA则完全取消了这一机制,这意味着被判犯有大量罪行的永久居民将被自动驱逐出境,无论他们与美国的关系有多密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retroactivity and Immigrant Crimes since St. Cyr: Emerging Signs of Judicial Restraint
Prior to 1996 if a permanent resident was convicted of a crime that subjected her to deportation, she was often eligible to apply for a waiver of deportation, known as 212(c) relief. A waiver of deportation was granted under 212(c) if the immigrant could show substantial equitable ties with the United States, including a U.S. citizen spouse or children, U.S. business ownership, and employment in the United States. These 212(c) waivers were routinely granted in more than fifty percent of cases. In 1996, however, Congress overhauled immigration law through two bills—the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). A central goal of the bills was to facilitate the deportation of immigrants convicted of crimes. To do this, AEDPA restricted and IIRIRA entirely eliminated the 212(c) waiver mechanism, meaning that permanent residents convicted of a greatly expanded list of crimes would be automatically deported, regardless of how deeply connected they were with the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Ultrastructural and Molecular Development of the Myotendinous Junction Triggered by Stretching Prior to Resistance Exercise. The Specification Power Cross-national analysis about the difference of histopathological management in Tis and T1 colorectal cancer between Japan and Korea. Law, Virtual Reality, and Augmented Reality Data-Driven Originalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1