波兰考古话语的理论和方法论基础。问题概述

Q2 Arts and Humanities Przeglad Archeologiczny Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.23858/pa70.2022.3032
Danuta Minta-Tworzowska
{"title":"波兰考古话语的理论和方法论基础。问题概述","authors":"Danuta Minta-Tworzowska","doi":"10.23858/pa70.2022.3032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is the preliminary presentation of the methodological tradition and theoretical condition of Polish archaeology. I focus here on the standard practice of Polish archaeologists, showing that either they have developed by themselves, borrowed or adapted elements of theories. Archaeological publications will be the basis for the article. The article also points to the multifaceted inspiration flowing from the humanities, social and biological sciences towards archaeology. The role of methodological turns was emphasized: anti-positivist, textual, visual, and performative. As a result, archaeology reached out to them with great hope, looking for answers to troublesome questions concerning forms of social life and culture in the past. The article highlights the individual aspects of Polish archaeology, including the nonobvious influence of Marxism, and processual and post-processual thinking.","PeriodicalId":36649,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Archeologiczny","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teoretyczne i metodologiczne podstawy archeologicznego dyskursu w Polsce. Zarys problematyki\",\"authors\":\"Danuta Minta-Tworzowska\",\"doi\":\"10.23858/pa70.2022.3032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is the preliminary presentation of the methodological tradition and theoretical condition of Polish archaeology. I focus here on the standard practice of Polish archaeologists, showing that either they have developed by themselves, borrowed or adapted elements of theories. Archaeological publications will be the basis for the article. The article also points to the multifaceted inspiration flowing from the humanities, social and biological sciences towards archaeology. The role of methodological turns was emphasized: anti-positivist, textual, visual, and performative. As a result, archaeology reached out to them with great hope, looking for answers to troublesome questions concerning forms of social life and culture in the past. The article highlights the individual aspects of Polish archaeology, including the nonobvious influence of Marxism, and processual and post-processual thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Archeologiczny\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Archeologiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23858/pa70.2022.3032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Archeologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/pa70.2022.3032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是初步介绍波兰考古学的方法论传统和理论条件。我在这里着重于波兰考古学家的标准实践,表明他们要么自己发展,要么借鉴或改编理论的元素。考古出版物将是这篇文章的基础。文章还指出了人文科学、社会科学和生物科学对考古学的多方面启示。强调了方法论转向的作用:反实证主义的、文本的、视觉的和表演的。因此,考古学带着极大的希望向他们伸出了援手,寻找有关过去社会生活和文化形式的棘手问题的答案。文章强调了波兰考古学的个别方面,包括马克思主义的非明显影响,以及过程和后过程思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teoretyczne i metodologiczne podstawy archeologicznego dyskursu w Polsce. Zarys problematyki
The aim of the article is the preliminary presentation of the methodological tradition and theoretical condition of Polish archaeology. I focus here on the standard practice of Polish archaeologists, showing that either they have developed by themselves, borrowed or adapted elements of theories. Archaeological publications will be the basis for the article. The article also points to the multifaceted inspiration flowing from the humanities, social and biological sciences towards archaeology. The role of methodological turns was emphasized: anti-positivist, textual, visual, and performative. As a result, archaeology reached out to them with great hope, looking for answers to troublesome questions concerning forms of social life and culture in the past. The article highlights the individual aspects of Polish archaeology, including the nonobvious influence of Marxism, and processual and post-processual thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Przeglad Archeologiczny
Przeglad Archeologiczny Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zaproszenie do teorii aktora-sieci – ontologia relacyjna a archeologia The Settlement and Economy of the Pyrzyce Lowland in the Pre-Roman and Roman Iron Ages Ośrodki węzłowe i kontakty transbałtyckie pomiędzy społecznościami północno-zachodniej Rusi i ziem polskich w X stuleciu Czy można mówić o działalności badawczej w warunkach nazistowskiego obozu koncentracyjnego? Uwagi na marginesie artykułu Andrzeja Prinkego „Religia i wierzenia społeczeństw pradziejowych i wczesnego średniowiecza w świetle źródeł archeologicznych i sztuki”, Biskupin 30-31.08.2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1