俄罗斯的代孕与“孤独男人”的道德恐慌

Maria Kirpichenko
{"title":"俄罗斯的代孕与“孤独男人”的道德恐慌","authors":"Maria Kirpichenko","doi":"10.23865/noros.v36.3698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Russian surrogacy and the moral panics around ‘single men’According to the ‘Anti-propaganda law’, the Russian state seeks to shield minors against ‘non-traditional sexual relations’. Despite this state-sanctioned intolerance, analysis reveals, that the webpages of many Russian surrogacy providers employ marketing strategies prominently featuring ‘single men’ – often used as a euphemism for gay men within the context of surrogacy. Nowhere else is the child-figure invoked in such (conceptual) proximity to the queer. The criminal case against surrogacy practitioners initiated in July 2020 exemplifies the tension that de-facto gay-inclusive surrogacy generates with respect to the official position of the Russian state. Drawing on the concept of homocapitalism (Rao, 2020), which offers a theoretical frame to account for the political effects of how neoliberal global free-market capitalism leverages the case for LGBTQ rights, this article inquires more deeply into this tension, asking: In what ways do surrogacy providers in Russia help to fuel moral panics with respect to the queer? What values and discourses do they appeal to when advertising their services to ‘single men’ on their websites? How do such agencies stand in conflict with respect to Russia’s current biopolitical project with its focus on ‘traditional family values’?","PeriodicalId":88615,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk ost-forum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russisk surrogati og den moralske panikken rundt «enslige menn»\",\"authors\":\"Maria Kirpichenko\",\"doi\":\"10.23865/noros.v36.3698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Russian surrogacy and the moral panics around ‘single men’According to the ‘Anti-propaganda law’, the Russian state seeks to shield minors against ‘non-traditional sexual relations’. Despite this state-sanctioned intolerance, analysis reveals, that the webpages of many Russian surrogacy providers employ marketing strategies prominently featuring ‘single men’ – often used as a euphemism for gay men within the context of surrogacy. Nowhere else is the child-figure invoked in such (conceptual) proximity to the queer. The criminal case against surrogacy practitioners initiated in July 2020 exemplifies the tension that de-facto gay-inclusive surrogacy generates with respect to the official position of the Russian state. Drawing on the concept of homocapitalism (Rao, 2020), which offers a theoretical frame to account for the political effects of how neoliberal global free-market capitalism leverages the case for LGBTQ rights, this article inquires more deeply into this tension, asking: In what ways do surrogacy providers in Russia help to fuel moral panics with respect to the queer? What values and discourses do they appeal to when advertising their services to ‘single men’ on their websites? How do such agencies stand in conflict with respect to Russia’s current biopolitical project with its focus on ‘traditional family values’?\",\"PeriodicalId\":88615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordisk ost-forum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordisk ost-forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v36.3698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk ost-forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v36.3698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:俄罗斯代孕与“单身男子”引发的道德恐慌根据“反宣传法”,俄罗斯政府试图保护未成年人免受“非传统性关系”的侵害。分析显示,尽管存在这种国家认可的不容忍,但许多俄罗斯代孕机构的网页仍采用突出“单身男性”的营销策略——在代孕的语境中,这通常是男同性恋者的委婉说法。没有其他地方的儿童形象与酷儿(概念上的)如此接近。2020年7月发起的针对代孕从业者的刑事案件,体现了事实上包容同性恋的代孕与俄罗斯国家官方立场之间的紧张关系。利用同性恋资本主义的概念(Rao, 2020),它提供了一个理论框架来解释新自由主义全球自由市场资本主义如何利用LGBTQ权利的政治影响,这篇文章更深入地探讨了这种紧张关系,问道:俄罗斯的代孕提供者以何种方式帮助加剧了关于酷儿的道德恐慌?当他们在网站上为“单身男性”做广告时,他们吸引了什么样的价值观和话语?这些机构如何与俄罗斯当前关注“传统家庭价值观”的生物政治项目相冲突?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Russisk surrogati og den moralske panikken rundt «enslige menn»
Abstract: Russian surrogacy and the moral panics around ‘single men’According to the ‘Anti-propaganda law’, the Russian state seeks to shield minors against ‘non-traditional sexual relations’. Despite this state-sanctioned intolerance, analysis reveals, that the webpages of many Russian surrogacy providers employ marketing strategies prominently featuring ‘single men’ – often used as a euphemism for gay men within the context of surrogacy. Nowhere else is the child-figure invoked in such (conceptual) proximity to the queer. The criminal case against surrogacy practitioners initiated in July 2020 exemplifies the tension that de-facto gay-inclusive surrogacy generates with respect to the official position of the Russian state. Drawing on the concept of homocapitalism (Rao, 2020), which offers a theoretical frame to account for the political effects of how neoliberal global free-market capitalism leverages the case for LGBTQ rights, this article inquires more deeply into this tension, asking: In what ways do surrogacy providers in Russia help to fuel moral panics with respect to the queer? What values and discourses do they appeal to when advertising their services to ‘single men’ on their websites? How do such agencies stand in conflict with respect to Russia’s current biopolitical project with its focus on ‘traditional family values’?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Krigsherren i Kreml og Putins krig: To populærvitenskapelige fremstillinger av krigen i Ukraina Spesialoperasjon: Ukraina og Russland 2004–2023 Hotet från Ryssland Den belarusiske autoritarismens seiglivethet og debatten om lokalforvaltningen Foreign Fighters in Ukraine: The Brown–Red Cocktail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1