突破封面:彼得·莱利的传球措施

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS CHICAGO REVIEW Pub Date : 2001-03-22 DOI:10.2307/25304721
Nigel Wheale
{"title":"突破封面:彼得·莱利的传球措施","authors":"Nigel Wheale","doi":"10.2307/25304721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breaking cover: Peter Riley's Passing Measures1 Kc: ...what tradition is present in your writing? PR: English poetry. All of it, good, bad and indifferent, popular and unpopular, overvalued and neglected, the lot. It's an entire climate, all the poetry being written at this time in this country. Kc: [Gasp!]2 There is no audience: there is one reader at a time comprising the potential of all readers, who has to be entirely trusted and honoured and is infinitely demanding. Which is to say that the poet is, actually, in love with the reader. There can be no qualification to that, except, of course, the reader's absence.3 Oxford University Press's outrageous decision to shed its poetry list in 1998 gives a misleading impression of the current state of poetry publication in the U.K. Indeed, this is an opportune time to attend to a loosely related group of poets who began writing in the U.K. during the mid-1960s and early 1970s, but whose work has not been easily obtainable until now. Michael Schmidt's Carcanet Press and Neil Astley's Bloodaxe Books, two of the most prolific poetry publishing houses in Britain, have begun to bring out single-author collections of writing which until the last few years had been side-lined by the larger publishers. In 1997 Bloodaxe published Barry MacSweeney's The Book of Demons, the poet's first \"overground\" publication since Hutchinson published his debut collection, The Boy from the Green Cabaret Tells of His Mother, as long ago as 1968. And in 1999 Bloodaxe in association with Folio and Fremantle Arts Centre Press published J. H. Prynne's monumental Poems, a corpus of writing which has variously inspired, enthused, and (more usually) infuriated British readers and poets ever since 1968. Carcanet had begun to anthologise some of this \"left-field\" writing in the late 1980s, and in 1995 published Michael Haslam's A Whole Bauble, gathering an exemplary, individual career from 1977 to 1994. In 1996 Penguin Modern Poets brought out a concise selection of poems from Douglas Oliver, Denise Riley, and lain Sinclair-Sinclair had tried to promote the poetry of Doug Oliver and others through an ill-fated Paladin Poetry series in the early 1990s. And in 2000 Carcanet in association with \"infernal methods\" published R. F. Langley's Collected Poems, a life-work of just seventeen poems over 72 pages. This immediately garnered a Poetry Book Society Recommendation, and was also shortlisted for the prestigious national Whitbread Poetry Award (won in the previous year by Seamus Heaney's translation of Beowulf). The independent presses and fugitive magazines must have been doing something right for all those years in the margin (I should declare an interest here, as R. F. Langley's infernally methodical publisher). It's also vital to highlight two other ambitious collectings from this loosely-related wave of writing: Denise Riley's Selected Poems, (absolutely no relation!) issued by Reality Street Editions (2000), and Anna Mendelssohn's Implacable Art, published by Folio and Equipage (2000). Probably the only quality uniting these diverse poetries is an intent to seriously challenge reader expectations about the demands which writing might make, and partly as a consequence of this ambition there are a number of careful and reflective statements as to the nature of poetic language from these writers. The latest of these is to be found as self-reflexive commentary in \"Lyric selves,\" chapter three of Denise Riley's The Words of Selves: Identification, Solidarity, Irony (Stanford, 2000). Therefore the ways in which this sometimes intransigent poetry is becoming more readable raises interesting questions: What changes in publishing culture have allowed this writing to become more visible? How does the reading of poems like these develop when they leave the immediate context of their writing and local circulation? This outline of recent British publishing history is not only helpful in situating the poetry of Peter Riley, it is actually necessary, because he has for over three decades made such an important contribution to informal networks and alliances for writing in the U. …","PeriodicalId":42508,"journal":{"name":"CHICAGO REVIEW","volume":"47 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25304721","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking Cover: Peter Riley's Passing Measures\",\"authors\":\"Nigel Wheale\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/25304721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Breaking cover: Peter Riley's Passing Measures1 Kc: ...what tradition is present in your writing? PR: English poetry. All of it, good, bad and indifferent, popular and unpopular, overvalued and neglected, the lot. It's an entire climate, all the poetry being written at this time in this country. Kc: [Gasp!]2 There is no audience: there is one reader at a time comprising the potential of all readers, who has to be entirely trusted and honoured and is infinitely demanding. Which is to say that the poet is, actually, in love with the reader. There can be no qualification to that, except, of course, the reader's absence.3 Oxford University Press's outrageous decision to shed its poetry list in 1998 gives a misleading impression of the current state of poetry publication in the U.K. Indeed, this is an opportune time to attend to a loosely related group of poets who began writing in the U.K. during the mid-1960s and early 1970s, but whose work has not been easily obtainable until now. Michael Schmidt's Carcanet Press and Neil Astley's Bloodaxe Books, two of the most prolific poetry publishing houses in Britain, have begun to bring out single-author collections of writing which until the last few years had been side-lined by the larger publishers. In 1997 Bloodaxe published Barry MacSweeney's The Book of Demons, the poet's first \\\"overground\\\" publication since Hutchinson published his debut collection, The Boy from the Green Cabaret Tells of His Mother, as long ago as 1968. And in 1999 Bloodaxe in association with Folio and Fremantle Arts Centre Press published J. H. Prynne's monumental Poems, a corpus of writing which has variously inspired, enthused, and (more usually) infuriated British readers and poets ever since 1968. Carcanet had begun to anthologise some of this \\\"left-field\\\" writing in the late 1980s, and in 1995 published Michael Haslam's A Whole Bauble, gathering an exemplary, individual career from 1977 to 1994. In 1996 Penguin Modern Poets brought out a concise selection of poems from Douglas Oliver, Denise Riley, and lain Sinclair-Sinclair had tried to promote the poetry of Doug Oliver and others through an ill-fated Paladin Poetry series in the early 1990s. And in 2000 Carcanet in association with \\\"infernal methods\\\" published R. F. Langley's Collected Poems, a life-work of just seventeen poems over 72 pages. This immediately garnered a Poetry Book Society Recommendation, and was also shortlisted for the prestigious national Whitbread Poetry Award (won in the previous year by Seamus Heaney's translation of Beowulf). The independent presses and fugitive magazines must have been doing something right for all those years in the margin (I should declare an interest here, as R. F. Langley's infernally methodical publisher). It's also vital to highlight two other ambitious collectings from this loosely-related wave of writing: Denise Riley's Selected Poems, (absolutely no relation!) issued by Reality Street Editions (2000), and Anna Mendelssohn's Implacable Art, published by Folio and Equipage (2000). Probably the only quality uniting these diverse poetries is an intent to seriously challenge reader expectations about the demands which writing might make, and partly as a consequence of this ambition there are a number of careful and reflective statements as to the nature of poetic language from these writers. The latest of these is to be found as self-reflexive commentary in \\\"Lyric selves,\\\" chapter three of Denise Riley's The Words of Selves: Identification, Solidarity, Irony (Stanford, 2000). Therefore the ways in which this sometimes intransigent poetry is becoming more readable raises interesting questions: What changes in publishing culture have allowed this writing to become more visible? How does the reading of poems like these develop when they leave the immediate context of their writing and local circulation? This outline of recent British publishing history is not only helpful in situating the poetry of Peter Riley, it is actually necessary, because he has for over three decades made such an important contribution to informal networks and alliances for writing in the U. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":42508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHICAGO REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25304721\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHICAGO REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/25304721\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY REVIEWS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHICAGO REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/25304721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

突破封面:彼得·莱利的传球措施1 Kc:……你的写作有哪些传统?英语诗歌。所有的一切,好的,坏的,冷漠的,受欢迎的,不受欢迎的,被高估的,被忽视的,所有的一切。这是整个气候,这个国家所有的诗歌都是在这个时候写的。Kc:(喘气![2]没有听众,只有一个读者代表着所有潜在的读者,他必须得到完全的信任和尊重,而且要求无限高。也就是说,诗人实际上爱上了读者。当然,除非读者不在场,否则对此没有任何限定牛津大学出版社(Oxford University Press)在1998年做出了一个令人发指的决定,取消了它的诗歌名单,这让人们对英国诗歌出版的现状产生了一种误解。事实上,这是一个关注一个关系松散的诗人群体的好时机,他们在20世纪60年代中期和70年代初开始在英国写作,但直到现在才容易获得他们的作品。Michael Schmidt的Carcanet Press和Neil Astley的Bloodaxe Books,这两家英国最多产的诗歌出版社,已经开始推出个人作家的作品集,直到几年前,这些作品一直被大型出版商边缘化。1997年,血斧出版社出版了巴里·麦克斯威尼的《恶魔之书》,这是自1968年哈钦森出版他的处女作《来自绿色酒店的男孩讲述他母亲的故事》以来,这位诗人的第一本“地上”出版物。1999年,血斧出版社与Folio和弗里曼特尔艺术中心出版社联合出版了j·h·白兰的不朽诗集。自1968年以来,这些诗集给英国读者和诗人带来了各种各样的灵感、热情,(通常情况下)也激怒了他们。Carcanet在20世纪80年代末开始将这些“左翼”作品选集,并于1995年出版了Michael Haslam的《A Whole Bauble》,收集了1977年至1994年期间的典型个人职业生涯。1996年,企鹅现代诗人出版了道格拉斯·奥利弗、丹尼斯·莱利和莱恩·辛克莱的简明诗集,辛克莱曾试图在20世纪90年代初通过一个命运多舛的《圣骑士诗歌》系列来推广道格·奥利弗和其他人的诗歌。2000年,Carcanet与“地狱的方法”联合出版了R. F. Langley的《诗集》,这是一部72页的17首诗的一生作品。这本书立即获得了诗歌图书协会的推荐,并入围了著名的国家惠特布里德诗歌奖(前一年由谢默斯·希尼翻译的《贝奥武夫》获得)。这些年来,独立出版社和逃亡杂志一定做了一些正确的事情(作为R. F. Langley内部有条不紊的出版商,我应该在这里宣布我的兴趣)。同样重要的是要强调这一松散相关的写作浪潮中的另外两部雄心勃勃的作品集:丹尼斯·莱利的《诗歌选集》(绝对没有关系!)由现实街出版社(2000)出版,以及安娜·门德尔松的《不可和解的艺术》,由Folio and Equipage出版社(2000)出版。也许唯一能将这些不同的诗歌统一起来的是一种意图,严肃地挑战读者对写作可能产生的要求的期望,部分由于这种雄心壮志,这些作家对诗歌语言的本质进行了许多仔细和反思的陈述。在丹尼斯·莱利的《自我的话语:认同、团结、讽刺》(斯坦福大学,2000年)的第三章“抒情自我”中,我们可以找到最新的自我反思评论。因此,这种有时不妥协的诗歌变得更可读的方式提出了一个有趣的问题:出版文化的哪些变化使这种作品变得更引人注目?当这些诗歌离开了它们的写作和当地流通的直接背景时,对它们的阅读是如何发展的?这篇关于英国近期出版历史的概述不仅有助于定位彼得·莱利的诗歌,而且实际上是必要的,因为他在三十多年来为美国的非正式写作网络和联盟做出了如此重要的贡献. ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Breaking Cover: Peter Riley's Passing Measures
Breaking cover: Peter Riley's Passing Measures1 Kc: ...what tradition is present in your writing? PR: English poetry. All of it, good, bad and indifferent, popular and unpopular, overvalued and neglected, the lot. It's an entire climate, all the poetry being written at this time in this country. Kc: [Gasp!]2 There is no audience: there is one reader at a time comprising the potential of all readers, who has to be entirely trusted and honoured and is infinitely demanding. Which is to say that the poet is, actually, in love with the reader. There can be no qualification to that, except, of course, the reader's absence.3 Oxford University Press's outrageous decision to shed its poetry list in 1998 gives a misleading impression of the current state of poetry publication in the U.K. Indeed, this is an opportune time to attend to a loosely related group of poets who began writing in the U.K. during the mid-1960s and early 1970s, but whose work has not been easily obtainable until now. Michael Schmidt's Carcanet Press and Neil Astley's Bloodaxe Books, two of the most prolific poetry publishing houses in Britain, have begun to bring out single-author collections of writing which until the last few years had been side-lined by the larger publishers. In 1997 Bloodaxe published Barry MacSweeney's The Book of Demons, the poet's first "overground" publication since Hutchinson published his debut collection, The Boy from the Green Cabaret Tells of His Mother, as long ago as 1968. And in 1999 Bloodaxe in association with Folio and Fremantle Arts Centre Press published J. H. Prynne's monumental Poems, a corpus of writing which has variously inspired, enthused, and (more usually) infuriated British readers and poets ever since 1968. Carcanet had begun to anthologise some of this "left-field" writing in the late 1980s, and in 1995 published Michael Haslam's A Whole Bauble, gathering an exemplary, individual career from 1977 to 1994. In 1996 Penguin Modern Poets brought out a concise selection of poems from Douglas Oliver, Denise Riley, and lain Sinclair-Sinclair had tried to promote the poetry of Doug Oliver and others through an ill-fated Paladin Poetry series in the early 1990s. And in 2000 Carcanet in association with "infernal methods" published R. F. Langley's Collected Poems, a life-work of just seventeen poems over 72 pages. This immediately garnered a Poetry Book Society Recommendation, and was also shortlisted for the prestigious national Whitbread Poetry Award (won in the previous year by Seamus Heaney's translation of Beowulf). The independent presses and fugitive magazines must have been doing something right for all those years in the margin (I should declare an interest here, as R. F. Langley's infernally methodical publisher). It's also vital to highlight two other ambitious collectings from this loosely-related wave of writing: Denise Riley's Selected Poems, (absolutely no relation!) issued by Reality Street Editions (2000), and Anna Mendelssohn's Implacable Art, published by Folio and Equipage (2000). Probably the only quality uniting these diverse poetries is an intent to seriously challenge reader expectations about the demands which writing might make, and partly as a consequence of this ambition there are a number of careful and reflective statements as to the nature of poetic language from these writers. The latest of these is to be found as self-reflexive commentary in "Lyric selves," chapter three of Denise Riley's The Words of Selves: Identification, Solidarity, Irony (Stanford, 2000). Therefore the ways in which this sometimes intransigent poetry is becoming more readable raises interesting questions: What changes in publishing culture have allowed this writing to become more visible? How does the reading of poems like these develop when they leave the immediate context of their writing and local circulation? This outline of recent British publishing history is not only helpful in situating the poetry of Peter Riley, it is actually necessary, because he has for over three decades made such an important contribution to informal networks and alliances for writing in the U. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CHICAGO REVIEW
CHICAGO REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: In the back issues room down the hall from Chicago Review’s offices on the third floor of Lillie House sit hundreds of unread magazines, yearning to see the light of day. These historic issues from the Chicago Review archives may now be ordered online with a credit card (via CCNow). Some of them are groundbreaking anthologies, others outstanding general issues.
期刊最新文献
Getting Under the Skin of Seizure Monitoring: A Subcutaneous EEG Tool to Keep a Tally Over the Long Haul. Engineering cytochrome P450 enzyme systems for biomedical and biotechnological applications. "I Am a Phenomenon Quite out of the Ordinary": The Notebooks, Diaries and Letters of Daniil Kharms Heavy Alcohol Drinking Associated Akathisia and Management with Quetiapine XR in Alcohol Dependent Patients. From THE PENTAGON
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1