伊朗普通医学综合考试研究的系统回顾

T. Changiz, F. Asgari, N. Yamani
{"title":"伊朗普通医学综合考试研究的系统回顾","authors":"T. Changiz, F. Asgari, N. Yamani","doi":"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Evaluation is one of the most important stages of education system. Student exams may be used both for student assessment and program evaluation. Given the significance of general medicine exams, the present study systematically reviews studies conducted on these exams in Iran in 2016.Methods : Available documents weresystematically reviewed and their information was collected. Using documents available in scientific databases suchas IranMedex, SID, Magiran, Medlib, PubMed, Google Scholar, ERIC by appropriate keywords (doctor, generalpractitioner, student, graduate, trainee, intern, exam, general sciences, pre-internship, skill and medical), 59 studies conducted on general medicine exams until March 2015 were extracted; of these studies, 10 studies which wereavailable in full text and met the least research quality were selected for the review. Results: Out of 10 studiesreviewed, 7 studies evaluated the effective factors on results of general medicine exams and 3 studies analyzed theresults of these exams. Meanwhile, results of those 7 studies showed that low GPA, delay in passing the basicsciences and age at the time of admission to the university are effective factors on results of exams. Results of threestudies analyzing exams showed that genetics and radiology gained the highest and parasitology, orthopedics andphysiology gained the lowest average percentage of scaled relative ratings. In analysis of 40 exams during a 20-yearperiod, 65.8% students were passed the exams in the first trial. However, 99.6% of participants continued their education after few trials. Conclusion: The factors such as length of stay in medical school and grand point averageof students are predicating comprehensive exam results in all the reviewed studies. Therefore, these factors can beconsidered as effective factors on results of general medicine exams. Also the results may support the importance ofnational comprehensive exams as a reliable tool in fostering quality in education. Keywords: exam, basic sciences, pre-internship, general medicine","PeriodicalId":17001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Studies on General Medicine Comprehensive Exams in Iran\",\"authors\":\"T. Changiz, F. Asgari, N. Yamani\",\"doi\":\"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Evaluation is one of the most important stages of education system. Student exams may be used both for student assessment and program evaluation. Given the significance of general medicine exams, the present study systematically reviews studies conducted on these exams in Iran in 2016.Methods : Available documents weresystematically reviewed and their information was collected. Using documents available in scientific databases suchas IranMedex, SID, Magiran, Medlib, PubMed, Google Scholar, ERIC by appropriate keywords (doctor, generalpractitioner, student, graduate, trainee, intern, exam, general sciences, pre-internship, skill and medical), 59 studies conducted on general medicine exams until March 2015 were extracted; of these studies, 10 studies which wereavailable in full text and met the least research quality were selected for the review. Results: Out of 10 studiesreviewed, 7 studies evaluated the effective factors on results of general medicine exams and 3 studies analyzed theresults of these exams. Meanwhile, results of those 7 studies showed that low GPA, delay in passing the basicsciences and age at the time of admission to the university are effective factors on results of exams. Results of threestudies analyzing exams showed that genetics and radiology gained the highest and parasitology, orthopedics andphysiology gained the lowest average percentage of scaled relative ratings. In analysis of 40 exams during a 20-yearperiod, 65.8% students were passed the exams in the first trial. However, 99.6% of participants continued their education after few trials. Conclusion: The factors such as length of stay in medical school and grand point averageof students are predicating comprehensive exam results in all the reviewed studies. Therefore, these factors can beconsidered as effective factors on results of general medicine exams. Also the results may support the importance ofnational comprehensive exams as a reliable tool in fostering quality in education. Keywords: exam, basic sciences, pre-internship, general medicine\",\"PeriodicalId\":17001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评价是教育体系中最重要的阶段之一。学生考试可用于学生评估和项目评估。鉴于全科医学考试的重要性,本研究系统地回顾了2016年在伊朗进行的关于这些考试的研究。方法:系统查阅现有文献资料,收集资料。利用IranMedex、SID、Magiran、Medlib、PubMed、谷歌Scholar、ERIC等科学数据库中的相关文献,按关键词(doctor、generalpractitioner、student、graduate、trainee、intern、exam、general sciences、pre-internship、skill和medical)提取2015年3月之前进行的59项全科医学考试研究;在这些研究中,选择了10项全文可用且符合最低研究质量的研究进行综述。结果:在回顾的10项研究中,7项研究评估了普通医学考试结果的影响因素,3项研究分析了这些考试结果。同时,这7项研究的结果表明,低GPA,延迟通过基础科学和入学时的年龄是影响考试结果的有效因素。三个研究分析考试的结果表明,遗传学和放射学获得了最高的相对评分,而寄生虫学、骨科和生理学获得了最低的相对评分。在对20年间40次考试的分析中,65.8%的学生在第一次试验中通过了考试。然而,99.6%的参与者在几次试验后继续接受教育。结论:在所回顾的研究中,学生的在校时间和平均分等因素对综合考试成绩有预测作用。因此,这些因素可以被认为是影响全科医学考试结果的有效因素。此外,研究结果可能支持国家综合考试作为提高教育质量的可靠工具的重要性。关键词:考试,基础科学,实习前,全科医学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Review of Studies on General Medicine Comprehensive Exams in Iran
Introduction: Evaluation is one of the most important stages of education system. Student exams may be used both for student assessment and program evaluation. Given the significance of general medicine exams, the present study systematically reviews studies conducted on these exams in Iran in 2016.Methods : Available documents weresystematically reviewed and their information was collected. Using documents available in scientific databases suchas IranMedex, SID, Magiran, Medlib, PubMed, Google Scholar, ERIC by appropriate keywords (doctor, generalpractitioner, student, graduate, trainee, intern, exam, general sciences, pre-internship, skill and medical), 59 studies conducted on general medicine exams until March 2015 were extracted; of these studies, 10 studies which wereavailable in full text and met the least research quality were selected for the review. Results: Out of 10 studiesreviewed, 7 studies evaluated the effective factors on results of general medicine exams and 3 studies analyzed theresults of these exams. Meanwhile, results of those 7 studies showed that low GPA, delay in passing the basicsciences and age at the time of admission to the university are effective factors on results of exams. Results of threestudies analyzing exams showed that genetics and radiology gained the highest and parasitology, orthopedics andphysiology gained the lowest average percentage of scaled relative ratings. In analysis of 40 exams during a 20-yearperiod, 65.8% students were passed the exams in the first trial. However, 99.6% of participants continued their education after few trials. Conclusion: The factors such as length of stay in medical school and grand point averageof students are predicating comprehensive exam results in all the reviewed studies. Therefore, these factors can beconsidered as effective factors on results of general medicine exams. Also the results may support the importance ofnational comprehensive exams as a reliable tool in fostering quality in education. Keywords: exam, basic sciences, pre-internship, general medicine
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simulation-Based Training in Basic Surgical Skills: Experiences from A Repeat Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia Referral Patterns of Paediatricians and General Medical Practitioners to Paediatric Dental Clinics and Oral Health Knowledge in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey The Effect of Dairy Products Intake on Dental Caries across Adolescent Females in Al Thahab Al Abyedh Village Baghdad The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction in selected colleges at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia The Relationship between Spiritual Well-being and Family Cohesion in Patients with Thalassemia Major
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1