改革陪审团否决制度:回归制度初衷保护死刑犯权利

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.2307/3491376
J. Richardson
{"title":"改革陪审团否决制度:回归制度初衷保护死刑犯权利","authors":"J. Richardson","doi":"10.2307/3491376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The death penalty has been justified as the \"community's judgment ... [of] the defendant's outrageous affront to humanity.\"' In Alabama and Florida,2 the two states that use the so-called \"jury override\"3 in capital cases, the ultimate decision of life or death is left to the trial judge, not to the jury, as the best reflection of the \"community's judgment.\" After the guilt phase of the trial, the jury issues only an advisory sentence of life or death, which the trial judge has the authority to override.4 In Alabama and Florida, judges have used their override power eighty-three and 167 times respectively, to sentence a defendant to death after a jury recommended","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3491376","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming the Jury Override: Protecting Capital Defendants' Rights by Returning to the System's Original Purpose\",\"authors\":\"J. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3491376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The death penalty has been justified as the \\\"community's judgment ... [of] the defendant's outrageous affront to humanity.\\\"' In Alabama and Florida,2 the two states that use the so-called \\\"jury override\\\"3 in capital cases, the ultimate decision of life or death is left to the trial judge, not to the jury, as the best reflection of the \\\"community's judgment.\\\" After the guilt phase of the trial, the jury issues only an advisory sentence of life or death, which the trial judge has the authority to override.4 In Alabama and Florida, judges have used their override power eighty-three and 167 times respectively, to sentence a defendant to death after a jury recommended\",\"PeriodicalId\":47821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3491376\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3491376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3491376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

死刑被认为是"社会的判决…被告对人性的无耻侮辱。“在阿拉巴马州和佛罗里达州,这两个州在死刑案件中使用所谓的‘陪审团推翻’,生死的最终决定留给了初审法官,而不是陪审团,因为这是‘社区判断’的最佳反映。”在审判的有罪阶段之后,陪审团只会作出终身或死刑的建议性判决,而初审法官有权撤销在阿拉巴马州和佛罗里达州,法官分别有83次和167次使用他们的推翻权力,在陪审团的建议下判处被告死刑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reforming the Jury Override: Protecting Capital Defendants' Rights by Returning to the System's Original Purpose
The death penalty has been justified as the "community's judgment ... [of] the defendant's outrageous affront to humanity."' In Alabama and Florida,2 the two states that use the so-called "jury override"3 in capital cases, the ultimate decision of life or death is left to the trial judge, not to the jury, as the best reflection of the "community's judgment." After the guilt phase of the trial, the jury issues only an advisory sentence of life or death, which the trial judge has the authority to override.4 In Alabama and Florida, judges have used their override power eighty-three and 167 times respectively, to sentence a defendant to death after a jury recommended
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal remains one of the most widely read and widely cited publications in the world. It is the second most widely subscribed journal published by any law school in the country. It is one of the most widely circulated law journals in the country, and our broad readership includes judges and legal academics, as well as practitioners, criminologists, and police officers. Research in the area of criminal law and criminology addresses concerns that are pertinent to most of American society. The Journal strives to publish the very best scholarship in this area, inspiring the intellectual debate and discussion essential to the development of social reform.
期刊最新文献
Homicide and the Death Penalty Progressive Prosecution in a Pandemic “I heard it through the grapevine”: a randomized controlled trial on the direct and vicarious effects of preventative specific deterrence initiatives in criminal networks The Clarks: An American Phenomenon Measuring Change: From Rates of Recidivism to Markers of Desistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1