自画像和影印:安妮塔·斯特克尔的女权主义拼贴画

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Panorama Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/24716839.17516
R. Middleman
{"title":"自画像和影印:安妮塔·斯特克尔的女权主义拼贴画","authors":"R. Middleman","doi":"10.24926/24716839.17516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Published in 1978, Copy Art: The First Complete Guide to the Copy Machine opens with the bold statement: “Welcome to the age of Copy Art. Now anyone has the potential to be an artist or designer at the push of a button.”1 Included among the book’s many examples is an illustration of Anita Steckel’s (1930–2012) photocopy work Creation Revisited (1977; fig. 1). In this aggregate image, a nude Steckel soars across Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam, riding on the back of a giant bird. “Revisiting” the biblical creation story that omits the female body, Steckel simultaneously addresses that absence and puts herself in dialogue with art history. Exploring the tension between Steckel’s desire for recognition as an artist and her irreverent approach to art making encapsulated by this work, I argue for a feminist interpretation of both her techniques and choices of media, which together posed subversive challenges to the stereotypes of artistic identity with which she contended. Despite the enthusiasm of Copy Art’s authors, Steckel’s appropriation points to the fact that easy-to-use technology alone was not enough to make anyone an “artist.”","PeriodicalId":42739,"journal":{"name":"Panorama","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Portraits and Photocopies: Anita Steckel’s Feminist Collage\",\"authors\":\"R. Middleman\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/24716839.17516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Published in 1978, Copy Art: The First Complete Guide to the Copy Machine opens with the bold statement: “Welcome to the age of Copy Art. Now anyone has the potential to be an artist or designer at the push of a button.”1 Included among the book’s many examples is an illustration of Anita Steckel’s (1930–2012) photocopy work Creation Revisited (1977; fig. 1). In this aggregate image, a nude Steckel soars across Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam, riding on the back of a giant bird. “Revisiting” the biblical creation story that omits the female body, Steckel simultaneously addresses that absence and puts herself in dialogue with art history. Exploring the tension between Steckel’s desire for recognition as an artist and her irreverent approach to art making encapsulated by this work, I argue for a feminist interpretation of both her techniques and choices of media, which together posed subversive challenges to the stereotypes of artistic identity with which she contended. Despite the enthusiasm of Copy Art’s authors, Steckel’s appropriation points to the fact that easy-to-use technology alone was not enough to make anyone an “artist.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":42739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Panorama\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Panorama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/24716839.17516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panorama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/24716839.17516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

出版于1978年的《复印艺术:第一部完整的复印机指南》开篇就大胆地说:“欢迎来到复印艺术的时代。现在,只要按下按钮,任何人都有成为艺术家或设计师的潜力。1在书中的许多例子中,有一幅插图是安妮塔·斯特克尔(Anita Steckel, 1930-2012)的影印作品《重新创作》(Creation Revisited, 1977;图1)在这幅综合图像中,一个裸体的斯特克尔骑在一只大鸟的背上,飞过米开朗基罗的《创造亚当》。“重新审视”省略女性身体的圣经创造故事,斯特克尔同时解决了这种缺失,并将自己置于艺术史的对话中。探讨了Steckel作为艺术家被认可的渴望和她对艺术创作的不敬方式之间的紧张关系,我主张对她的技术和媒体的选择进行女权主义的解释,这些都对她所主张的艺术身份的刻板印象提出了颠覆性的挑战。尽管Copy Art的作者们热情高涨,但Steckel的挪用指出了一个事实,即简单易用的技术本身并不足以使任何人成为“艺术家”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-Portraits and Photocopies: Anita Steckel’s Feminist Collage
Published in 1978, Copy Art: The First Complete Guide to the Copy Machine opens with the bold statement: “Welcome to the age of Copy Art. Now anyone has the potential to be an artist or designer at the push of a button.”1 Included among the book’s many examples is an illustration of Anita Steckel’s (1930–2012) photocopy work Creation Revisited (1977; fig. 1). In this aggregate image, a nude Steckel soars across Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam, riding on the back of a giant bird. “Revisiting” the biblical creation story that omits the female body, Steckel simultaneously addresses that absence and puts herself in dialogue with art history. Exploring the tension between Steckel’s desire for recognition as an artist and her irreverent approach to art making encapsulated by this work, I argue for a feminist interpretation of both her techniques and choices of media, which together posed subversive challenges to the stereotypes of artistic identity with which she contended. Despite the enthusiasm of Copy Art’s authors, Steckel’s appropriation points to the fact that easy-to-use technology alone was not enough to make anyone an “artist.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Panorama
Panorama SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
EL PROCESO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y SU RELACIÓN CON LA MOTIVACIÓN INTRÍNSECA Y EXTRÍNSECA Self-Portraits and Photocopies: Anita Steckel’s Feminist Collage Amalia Mesa-Bains: Archeology of Memory The Work of Undoing Highpoint Editions: A History & Catalogue, 2001–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1