使用低离子强度缓冲液测量低亲和度、多反应性免疫球蛋白G抗体的灵敏度

A. Engelmaier, Harald Arno Butterweck, A. Weber
{"title":"使用低离子强度缓冲液测量低亲和度、多反应性免疫球蛋白G抗体的灵敏度","authors":"A. Engelmaier, Harald Arno Butterweck, A. Weber","doi":"10.26502/jatr.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement of Low Avidity, Polyreactive Immunoglobulin G Antibodies with Increased Sensitivity by Using Low Abstract Low avidity polyreactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies have a broad range of affinity with dissociation constants of 10 -5 to 10 -8 . Both their low concentration and avidity require low dilutions for measurement in solid-phase assays, which can cause issues due to the high total IgG levels probably interacting with the solid support. Here, we show that using an assay buffer system with low conductivity obviously increases the sensitivity of direct ELISAs. The 40 42 carbonate 9.5, were coated to HEPES, pH 7.4. Both buffers contained 10 mg/mL human serum albumin. Serial dilution series were loaded to antigen-coated and blank wells after blocking the plate with the respective dilution buffer. Detection of binding was achieved by an anti-human IgG peroxidase and peroxidase staining. Reduced dilution buffer’s conductivity increased signals by at least 50-fold without affecting the binding selectivity. Within the NaCl concentration range from 0 to 150 mM in 20 mM HEPES buffer, the conductivity correlated well with the signal height (R²=0.98). Competition experiments confirmed the assay’s adequate selectivity. In summary, buffer systems with low conductivity significantly increase the signals of direct ELISA without negatively affecting their selectivity. This simple assay modification increases the validity of results obtained by direct ELISAs for measurement of autoantibodies. and regulation of","PeriodicalId":93773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical techniques and research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Low Avidity, Polyreactive Immunoglobulin G Antibodies with Increased Sensitivity by Using Low Ionic Strength Buffers\",\"authors\":\"A. Engelmaier, Harald Arno Butterweck, A. Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/jatr.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Measurement of Low Avidity, Polyreactive Immunoglobulin G Antibodies with Increased Sensitivity by Using Low Abstract Low avidity polyreactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies have a broad range of affinity with dissociation constants of 10 -5 to 10 -8 . Both their low concentration and avidity require low dilutions for measurement in solid-phase assays, which can cause issues due to the high total IgG levels probably interacting with the solid support. Here, we show that using an assay buffer system with low conductivity obviously increases the sensitivity of direct ELISAs. The 40 42 carbonate 9.5, were coated to HEPES, pH 7.4. Both buffers contained 10 mg/mL human serum albumin. Serial dilution series were loaded to antigen-coated and blank wells after blocking the plate with the respective dilution buffer. Detection of binding was achieved by an anti-human IgG peroxidase and peroxidase staining. Reduced dilution buffer’s conductivity increased signals by at least 50-fold without affecting the binding selectivity. Within the NaCl concentration range from 0 to 150 mM in 20 mM HEPES buffer, the conductivity correlated well with the signal height (R²=0.98). Competition experiments confirmed the assay’s adequate selectivity. In summary, buffer systems with low conductivity significantly increase the signals of direct ELISA without negatively affecting their selectivity. This simple assay modification increases the validity of results obtained by direct ELISAs for measurement of autoantibodies. and regulation of\",\"PeriodicalId\":93773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical techniques and research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical techniques and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/jatr.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical techniques and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jatr.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低亲和度多反应性免疫球蛋白G (IgG)抗体具有广泛的亲和力,解离常数为10 -5 ~ 10 -8。在固相分析中,它们的低浓度和低密度都需要低稀释度进行测量,这可能会导致由于高总IgG水平可能与固体载体相互作用而引起的问题。在这里,我们表明使用低电导率的分析缓冲系统明显增加了直接elisa的灵敏度。将40 42碳酸盐9.5包被至HEPES, pH 7.4。两种缓冲液均含有10 mg/mL人血清白蛋白。用相应的稀释缓冲液阻断平板后,将一系列稀释系列装入抗原包被孔和空白孔中。通过抗人IgG过氧化物酶和过氧化物酶染色检测结合。降低稀释缓冲液的电导率使信号增加至少50倍而不影响结合选择性。在NaCl浓度为0 ~ 150 mM的20 mM HEPES缓冲液中,电导率与信号高度呈良好的相关关系(R²=0.98)。竞争性实验证实了该方法具有足够的选择性。综上所述,低电导率的缓冲系统显著增加了直接ELISA的信号,而不会对其选择性产生负面影响。这种简单的分析修改增加了直接elisa法测定自身抗体所得结果的有效性。以及对
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurement of Low Avidity, Polyreactive Immunoglobulin G Antibodies with Increased Sensitivity by Using Low Ionic Strength Buffers
Measurement of Low Avidity, Polyreactive Immunoglobulin G Antibodies with Increased Sensitivity by Using Low Abstract Low avidity polyreactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies have a broad range of affinity with dissociation constants of 10 -5 to 10 -8 . Both their low concentration and avidity require low dilutions for measurement in solid-phase assays, which can cause issues due to the high total IgG levels probably interacting with the solid support. Here, we show that using an assay buffer system with low conductivity obviously increases the sensitivity of direct ELISAs. The 40 42 carbonate 9.5, were coated to HEPES, pH 7.4. Both buffers contained 10 mg/mL human serum albumin. Serial dilution series were loaded to antigen-coated and blank wells after blocking the plate with the respective dilution buffer. Detection of binding was achieved by an anti-human IgG peroxidase and peroxidase staining. Reduced dilution buffer’s conductivity increased signals by at least 50-fold without affecting the binding selectivity. Within the NaCl concentration range from 0 to 150 mM in 20 mM HEPES buffer, the conductivity correlated well with the signal height (R²=0.98). Competition experiments confirmed the assay’s adequate selectivity. In summary, buffer systems with low conductivity significantly increase the signals of direct ELISA without negatively affecting their selectivity. This simple assay modification increases the validity of results obtained by direct ELISAs for measurement of autoantibodies. and regulation of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenotypic variability in expressivity and deleterious capability of the homozygous UGT1A1*28 genotype Conventional Frontal Air Sinus Imaging in Personal Identification among Adult Bangladeshi Plasmon-Induced Flexibility and Refractive Index Measurement in A Sensor Designed by a Cavity, Two Rings, Two Teeth and Two Plasmonic Waveguides Design of an Advanced Plasmonic Sensor (Consisting of A Quadrilateral Cavity, Three Rings with Different Dimensions and Two Waveguides) Using Refractive Index Change Dynamic Regulation of MALAT1 in Leader Cell Formation and Collective Cancer Invasion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1