使用机器学习的急诊科分类预测模型:综述

Fei Gao, B. Boukebous, Pozzar Mario, Alaoui Enora, Sano Batourou, Sahar Bayat-Makoei
{"title":"使用机器学习的急诊科分类预测模型:综述","authors":"Fei Gao, B. Boukebous, Pozzar Mario, Alaoui Enora, Sano Batourou, Sahar Bayat-Makoei","doi":"10.26502/ogr082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predictive Models for Emergency Department Triage using Machine Learning: A Review. Obstetrics Abstract Background: Recently, many research groups have tried to develop emergency department triage decision support systems based on big volumes of historical clinical data to differentiate and prioritize patients. Machine learning models might improve the predictive capacity of emergency department triage systems. The aim of this review was to assess the performance of recently described machine learning models for patient triage in emergency departments, and to identify future challenges. Methods: Four databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar and Springer) were searched using key words identified in the research questions. To focus on the latest studies on the subject, the most cited papers between 2018 and October 2021 were selected. Only works with hospital admission and critical illness as outcomes were included in the analysis. Results: (hospital admission and critical illness) and developed 55 predictive models. Random Forest and Logistic Regression were the most commonly used prediction algorithms, and the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) the most frequently used metric to assess the algorithm prediction performance. Random Forest and Logistic Regression were the most discriminant models according to the selected studies. Conclusions: Machine learning-based triage systems could improve decision-making in emergency departments, thus leading to better patients’ outcomes. However, there is still scope for improvement concerning the prediction performance and explicability of ML models.","PeriodicalId":74336,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Models for Emergency Department Triage using Machine Learning: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Fei Gao, B. Boukebous, Pozzar Mario, Alaoui Enora, Sano Batourou, Sahar Bayat-Makoei\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/ogr082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Predictive Models for Emergency Department Triage using Machine Learning: A Review. Obstetrics Abstract Background: Recently, many research groups have tried to develop emergency department triage decision support systems based on big volumes of historical clinical data to differentiate and prioritize patients. Machine learning models might improve the predictive capacity of emergency department triage systems. The aim of this review was to assess the performance of recently described machine learning models for patient triage in emergency departments, and to identify future challenges. Methods: Four databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar and Springer) were searched using key words identified in the research questions. To focus on the latest studies on the subject, the most cited papers between 2018 and October 2021 were selected. Only works with hospital admission and critical illness as outcomes were included in the analysis. Results: (hospital admission and critical illness) and developed 55 predictive models. Random Forest and Logistic Regression were the most commonly used prediction algorithms, and the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) the most frequently used metric to assess the algorithm prediction performance. Random Forest and Logistic Regression were the most discriminant models according to the selected studies. Conclusions: Machine learning-based triage systems could improve decision-making in emergency departments, thus leading to better patients’ outcomes. However, there is still scope for improvement concerning the prediction performance and explicability of ML models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/ogr082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/ogr082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用机器学习的急诊科分类预测模型:综述。摘要背景:近年来,许多研究小组试图开发基于大量历史临床数据的急诊科分诊决策支持系统,以区分和优先考虑患者。机器学习模型可以提高急诊科分诊系统的预测能力。本综述的目的是评估最近描述的用于急诊科患者分诊的机器学习模型的性能,并确定未来的挑战。方法:使用在研究问题中确定的关键词检索四个数据库(ScienceDirect、PubMed、谷歌Scholar和施普林格)。为了关注该主题的最新研究,我们选择了2018年至2021年10月期间被引用最多的论文。仅以住院和危重疾病为结果的作品被纳入分析。结果:(住院和危重症)并建立了55个预测模型。随机森林和逻辑回归是最常用的预测算法,接受者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)是评估算法预测性能的最常用指标。根据所选研究,随机森林和逻辑回归是最具判别性的模型。结论:基于机器学习的分诊系统可以改善急诊科的决策,从而改善患者的预后。然而,机器学习模型的预测性能和可解释性仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Models for Emergency Department Triage using Machine Learning: A Review
Predictive Models for Emergency Department Triage using Machine Learning: A Review. Obstetrics Abstract Background: Recently, many research groups have tried to develop emergency department triage decision support systems based on big volumes of historical clinical data to differentiate and prioritize patients. Machine learning models might improve the predictive capacity of emergency department triage systems. The aim of this review was to assess the performance of recently described machine learning models for patient triage in emergency departments, and to identify future challenges. Methods: Four databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar and Springer) were searched using key words identified in the research questions. To focus on the latest studies on the subject, the most cited papers between 2018 and October 2021 were selected. Only works with hospital admission and critical illness as outcomes were included in the analysis. Results: (hospital admission and critical illness) and developed 55 predictive models. Random Forest and Logistic Regression were the most commonly used prediction algorithms, and the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) the most frequently used metric to assess the algorithm prediction performance. Random Forest and Logistic Regression were the most discriminant models according to the selected studies. Conclusions: Machine learning-based triage systems could improve decision-making in emergency departments, thus leading to better patients’ outcomes. However, there is still scope for improvement concerning the prediction performance and explicability of ML models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sex-Specific Dysregulation of Placental Lipid Metabolism in Preeclampsia. Polyclonal Anti-D Antibodies Significantly Reduce the Rate of Miscarriages in Rh(D) positive Women with Recurrent Pregnancy loss. Exosomal Lipid Biomarkers of Oligodendrocyte Pathology to Predict Scoliosis in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Neonatal Effects of Maternal Supplementation with Docosahexaenoic Acid and Lactoferrin on the Fetal Brain and Placenta in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction Effect of Forkhead Box Protein 3 Gene Polymorphisms in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1