少数民族差异的再私有化:丹麦宗教迁就的市政政治中的代表、承认和再分配

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.33134/njmr.502
Tatiana Fogelman
{"title":"少数民族差异的再私有化:丹麦宗教迁就的市政政治中的代表、承认和再分配","authors":"Tatiana Fogelman","doi":"10.33134/njmr.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines an issue that highlights intimate connections between minority and migration politics, namely politics of religious accommodation. It does so through analyzing a conflict between the Copenhagen municipality and a Jewish kindergarten that resulted in an enforced privatization. Conceptualizing it as a part of wider struggles over recognition (broadly conceived) of migration-pertaining difference in Denmark, I analyze the case through Nancy Fraser's (2009) theory of justice as comprised of singular but inter-related arenas of (cultural) recognition, (institutional-political) representation and (economic) redistribution, bound together by a norm of participatory parity. I argue that while the negotiation was characterized by instances of both misrepresentation and misrecognition, the municipality's preference for the institution's privatization reflects not only a return to the traditional preference for the privatization of difference, but also the centrality of the redistributive arena of justice in Denmark. If the latter tends to be in welfare contexts understood by the majority as always already expressing recognition, from a minority perspective the state's embrace of such a recognition-through-redistribution approach can entail an injury of lacking or erroneous recognition . Whether the minority will perceive a single case as such an injury depends on the broader tenor of politics of minority and immigrant difference at the time.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Privatizing Minority Difference: Representation, Recognition, and Redistribution in the Municipal Politics of Religious Accommodation in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Fogelman\",\"doi\":\"10.33134/njmr.502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines an issue that highlights intimate connections between minority and migration politics, namely politics of religious accommodation. It does so through analyzing a conflict between the Copenhagen municipality and a Jewish kindergarten that resulted in an enforced privatization. Conceptualizing it as a part of wider struggles over recognition (broadly conceived) of migration-pertaining difference in Denmark, I analyze the case through Nancy Fraser's (2009) theory of justice as comprised of singular but inter-related arenas of (cultural) recognition, (institutional-political) representation and (economic) redistribution, bound together by a norm of participatory parity. I argue that while the negotiation was characterized by instances of both misrepresentation and misrecognition, the municipality's preference for the institution's privatization reflects not only a return to the traditional preference for the privatization of difference, but also the centrality of the redistributive arena of justice in Denmark. If the latter tends to be in welfare contexts understood by the majority as always already expressing recognition, from a minority perspective the state's embrace of such a recognition-through-redistribution approach can entail an injury of lacking or erroneous recognition . Whether the minority will perceive a single case as such an injury depends on the broader tenor of politics of minority and immigrant difference at the time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了一个突出少数民族与移民政治之间密切联系的问题,即宗教迁就政治。它通过分析哥本哈根市政府和犹太幼儿园之间导致强制私有化的冲突来实现这一目标。将其概念化为对丹麦移民相关差异的承认(广义上)的更广泛斗争的一部分,我通过Nancy Fraser(2009)的正义理论来分析这个案例,该理论由(文化)承认、(制度政治)代表和(经济)再分配的单一但相互关联的领域组成,通过参与平等的规范联系在一起。我认为,虽然谈判的特点是出现了歪曲和误认的情况,但市政当局对该机构私有化的偏好不仅反映了对差异私有化的传统偏好的回归,而且反映了丹麦司法再分配领域的中心地位。如果后者倾向于在福利背景下被大多数人理解为总是已经表达了认可,那么从少数人的角度来看,国家接受这种通过再分配来认可的方法可能会导致缺乏或错误认可的伤害。少数族裔是否会将单一案件视为一种伤害,取决于当时少数族裔和移民差异的更广泛的政治基调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Re-Privatizing Minority Difference: Representation, Recognition, and Redistribution in the Municipal Politics of Religious Accommodation in Denmark
This article examines an issue that highlights intimate connections between minority and migration politics, namely politics of religious accommodation. It does so through analyzing a conflict between the Copenhagen municipality and a Jewish kindergarten that resulted in an enforced privatization. Conceptualizing it as a part of wider struggles over recognition (broadly conceived) of migration-pertaining difference in Denmark, I analyze the case through Nancy Fraser's (2009) theory of justice as comprised of singular but inter-related arenas of (cultural) recognition, (institutional-political) representation and (economic) redistribution, bound together by a norm of participatory parity. I argue that while the negotiation was characterized by instances of both misrepresentation and misrecognition, the municipality's preference for the institution's privatization reflects not only a return to the traditional preference for the privatization of difference, but also the centrality of the redistributive arena of justice in Denmark. If the latter tends to be in welfare contexts understood by the majority as always already expressing recognition, from a minority perspective the state's embrace of such a recognition-through-redistribution approach can entail an injury of lacking or erroneous recognition . Whether the minority will perceive a single case as such an injury depends on the broader tenor of politics of minority and immigrant difference at the time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1