K. Banno, H. Kaland, A. Crescitelli, SA Tuene, GH Aas, LC Gansel
{"title":"水产养殖场野生鱼类监测的新方法:利用计算机视觉分析野生鱼类的存在","authors":"K. Banno, H. Kaland, A. Crescitelli, SA Tuene, GH Aas, LC Gansel","doi":"10.3354/aei00432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Aquaculture in open sea-cages attracts large numbers of wild fish. Such aggregations may have various impacts on farmed and wild fish, the environment, fish farming, and fisheries activities. Therefore, it is important to understand the patterns and amount of wild fish aggregations at aquaculture sites. In recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated detection of fish has seen major advancements, and this technology can be applied to wild fish abundance monitoring. We present a monitoring procedure that uses a combination of multiple cameras and automatic fish detection by AI. Wild fish in images collected around commercial salmon cages in Norway were automatically identified and counted by a system based on the real-time object detector framework YOLOv4, and the results were compared with manual human counts. Overall, the automatic system resulted in higher fish numbers than the manual counts. The performance of the system was satisfactory regarding false negatives (i.e. non-detected fish), while the false positive (i.e. objects wrongly detected as fish) rate was above 7%, which was considered an acceptable limit of error in comparison with the manual counts. The main causes of false positives were confusing backgrounds and mismatches between detection thresholds for automated and manual counts. However, these issues can be overcome by using training images that represent real scenarios (i.e. various backgrounds and fish densities) and setting proper detection thresholds. We present here a procedure with great potential for autonomous monitoring of wild fish abundance at aquaculture sites.","PeriodicalId":8376,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Environment Interactions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel approach for wild fish monitoring at aquaculture sites: wild fish presence analysis using computer vision\",\"authors\":\"K. Banno, H. Kaland, A. Crescitelli, SA Tuene, GH Aas, LC Gansel\",\"doi\":\"10.3354/aei00432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Aquaculture in open sea-cages attracts large numbers of wild fish. Such aggregations may have various impacts on farmed and wild fish, the environment, fish farming, and fisheries activities. Therefore, it is important to understand the patterns and amount of wild fish aggregations at aquaculture sites. In recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated detection of fish has seen major advancements, and this technology can be applied to wild fish abundance monitoring. We present a monitoring procedure that uses a combination of multiple cameras and automatic fish detection by AI. Wild fish in images collected around commercial salmon cages in Norway were automatically identified and counted by a system based on the real-time object detector framework YOLOv4, and the results were compared with manual human counts. Overall, the automatic system resulted in higher fish numbers than the manual counts. The performance of the system was satisfactory regarding false negatives (i.e. non-detected fish), while the false positive (i.e. objects wrongly detected as fish) rate was above 7%, which was considered an acceptable limit of error in comparison with the manual counts. The main causes of false positives were confusing backgrounds and mismatches between detection thresholds for automated and manual counts. However, these issues can be overcome by using training images that represent real scenarios (i.e. various backgrounds and fish densities) and setting proper detection thresholds. We present here a procedure with great potential for autonomous monitoring of wild fish abundance at aquaculture sites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture Environment Interactions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture Environment Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00432\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A novel approach for wild fish monitoring at aquaculture sites: wild fish presence analysis using computer vision
: Aquaculture in open sea-cages attracts large numbers of wild fish. Such aggregations may have various impacts on farmed and wild fish, the environment, fish farming, and fisheries activities. Therefore, it is important to understand the patterns and amount of wild fish aggregations at aquaculture sites. In recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated detection of fish has seen major advancements, and this technology can be applied to wild fish abundance monitoring. We present a monitoring procedure that uses a combination of multiple cameras and automatic fish detection by AI. Wild fish in images collected around commercial salmon cages in Norway were automatically identified and counted by a system based on the real-time object detector framework YOLOv4, and the results were compared with manual human counts. Overall, the automatic system resulted in higher fish numbers than the manual counts. The performance of the system was satisfactory regarding false negatives (i.e. non-detected fish), while the false positive (i.e. objects wrongly detected as fish) rate was above 7%, which was considered an acceptable limit of error in comparison with the manual counts. The main causes of false positives were confusing backgrounds and mismatches between detection thresholds for automated and manual counts. However, these issues can be overcome by using training images that represent real scenarios (i.e. various backgrounds and fish densities) and setting proper detection thresholds. We present here a procedure with great potential for autonomous monitoring of wild fish abundance at aquaculture sites.
期刊介绍:
AEI presents rigorously refereed and carefully selected Research Articles, Reviews and Notes, as well as Comments/Reply Comments (for details see MEPS 228:1), Theme Sections and Opinion Pieces. For details consult the Guidelines for Authors. Papers may be concerned with interactions between aquaculture and the environment from local to ecosystem scales, at all levels of organisation and investigation. Areas covered include:
-Pollution and nutrient inputs; bio-accumulation and impacts of chemical compounds used in aquaculture.
-Effects on benthic and pelagic assemblages or processes that are related to aquaculture activities.
-Interactions of wild fauna (invertebrates, fishes, birds, mammals) with aquaculture activities; genetic impacts on wild populations.
-Parasite and pathogen interactions between farmed and wild stocks.
-Comparisons of the environmental effects of traditional and organic aquaculture.
-Introductions of alien species; escape and intentional releases (seeding) of cultured organisms into the wild.
-Effects of capture-based aquaculture (ranching).
-Interactions of aquaculture installations with biofouling organisms and consequences of biofouling control measures.
-Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture; comparisons of re-circulation and ‘open’ systems.
-Effects of climate change and environmental variability on aquaculture activities.
-Modelling of aquaculture–environment interactions; assessment of carrying capacity.
-Interactions between aquaculture and other industries (e.g. tourism, fisheries, transport).
-Policy and practice of aquaculture regulation directed towards environmental management; site selection, spatial planning, Integrated Coastal Zone Management, and eco-ethics.