A. Larraín, Marisol Gómez, M. Calderón, Gabriel Fortes de Macedo, F. Ramírez, Valentina Guzmán, H. Cofré
{"title":"智利公共教育中自然科学教师论证内容的教学知识描述","authors":"A. Larraín, Marisol Gómez, M. Calderón, Gabriel Fortes de Macedo, F. Ramírez, Valentina Guzmán, H. Cofré","doi":"10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science teaching has been called to contribute to citizenship insofar as it requires scientific competencies such as articulating theory and evidence, and the critical evaluation of different points of view. To promote argumentation in science teaching is key but not simple and requires teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of argumentation. International literature has reported low PCK of argumentation in science teachers, but we scarcely know about this in Spanish speaking countries. is paper reports a study aimed at describing the PCK of argumentation on 10 primary science teachers in Chile. Lessons were video recorded, and interviews were conducted. Results show low PCK of argumentation overall, and declarative PCK does not necessarily relates with procedimental PCK. Moreover, different configurations of the dimensions of PCK of argumentation were observed, suggesting that there is not one possible learning progression, but different ones. Educational and scientific implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44952,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descripción del conocimiento pedagógico del contenido de la argumentación en docentes que enseñan ciencias naturales en educación pública en Chile\",\"authors\":\"A. Larraín, Marisol Gómez, M. Calderón, Gabriel Fortes de Macedo, F. Ramírez, Valentina Guzmán, H. Cofré\",\"doi\":\"10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science teaching has been called to contribute to citizenship insofar as it requires scientific competencies such as articulating theory and evidence, and the critical evaluation of different points of view. To promote argumentation in science teaching is key but not simple and requires teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of argumentation. International literature has reported low PCK of argumentation in science teachers, but we scarcely know about this in Spanish speaking countries. is paper reports a study aimed at describing the PCK of argumentation on 10 primary science teachers in Chile. Lessons were video recorded, and interviews were conducted. Results show low PCK of argumentation overall, and declarative PCK does not necessarily relates with procedimental PCK. Moreover, different configurations of the dimensions of PCK of argumentation were observed, suggesting that there is not one possible learning progression, but different ones. Educational and scientific implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Descripción del conocimiento pedagógico del contenido de la argumentación en docentes que enseñan ciencias naturales en educación pública en Chile
Science teaching has been called to contribute to citizenship insofar as it requires scientific competencies such as articulating theory and evidence, and the critical evaluation of different points of view. To promote argumentation in science teaching is key but not simple and requires teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of argumentation. International literature has reported low PCK of argumentation in science teachers, but we scarcely know about this in Spanish speaking countries. is paper reports a study aimed at describing the PCK of argumentation on 10 primary science teachers in Chile. Lessons were video recorded, and interviews were conducted. Results show low PCK of argumentation overall, and declarative PCK does not necessarily relates with procedimental PCK. Moreover, different configurations of the dimensions of PCK of argumentation were observed, suggesting that there is not one possible learning progression, but different ones. Educational and scientific implications are discussed.