智利公共教育中自然科学教师论证内容的教学知识描述

A. Larraín, Marisol Gómez, M. Calderón, Gabriel Fortes de Macedo, F. Ramírez, Valentina Guzmán, H. Cofré
{"title":"智利公共教育中自然科学教师论证内容的教学知识描述","authors":"A. Larraín, Marisol Gómez, M. Calderón, Gabriel Fortes de Macedo, F. Ramírez, Valentina Guzmán, H. Cofré","doi":"10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science teaching has been called to contribute to citizenship insofar as it requires scientific competencies such as articulating theory and evidence, and the critical evaluation of different points of view. To promote argumentation in science teaching is key but not simple and requires teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of argumentation. International literature has reported low PCK of argumentation in science teachers, but we scarcely know about this in Spanish speaking countries. is paper reports a study aimed at describing the PCK of argumentation on 10 primary science teachers in Chile. Lessons were video recorded, and interviews were conducted. Results show low PCK of argumentation overall, and declarative PCK does not necessarily relates with procedimental PCK. Moreover, different configurations of the dimensions of PCK of argumentation were observed, suggesting that there is not one possible learning progression, but different ones. Educational and scientific implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44952,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descripción del conocimiento pedagógico del contenido de la argumentación en docentes que enseñan ciencias naturales en educación pública en Chile\",\"authors\":\"A. Larraín, Marisol Gómez, M. Calderón, Gabriel Fortes de Macedo, F. Ramírez, Valentina Guzmán, H. Cofré\",\"doi\":\"10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science teaching has been called to contribute to citizenship insofar as it requires scientific competencies such as articulating theory and evidence, and the critical evaluation of different points of view. To promote argumentation in science teaching is key but not simple and requires teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of argumentation. International literature has reported low PCK of argumentation in science teachers, but we scarcely know about this in Spanish speaking countries. is paper reports a study aimed at describing the PCK of argumentation on 10 primary science teachers in Chile. Lessons were video recorded, and interviews were conducted. Results show low PCK of argumentation overall, and declarative PCK does not necessarily relates with procedimental PCK. Moreover, different configurations of the dimensions of PCK of argumentation were observed, suggesting that there is not one possible learning progression, but different ones. Educational and scientific implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

科学教学一直被呼吁为公民做出贡献,因为它需要科学能力,如阐明理论和证据,以及对不同观点的批判性评估。在科学教学中推进论证是关键而不简单的,需要教师具备论证的教学内容知识。国际文献报道了科学教师的论证能力较低,但我们对西班牙语国家的这一情况知之甚少。这篇论文报告了一项旨在描述智利10名小学科学教师论证的PCK的研究。课程录像,并进行采访。结果显示论证的PCK总体较低,陈述性PCK与程序性PCK并不一定相关。此外,我们还观察到论证的PCK维度的不同配置,表明不存在一种可能的学习进阶,而是存在不同的学习进阶。讨论了教育和科学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Descripción del conocimiento pedagógico del contenido de la argumentación en docentes que enseñan ciencias naturales en educación pública en Chile
Science teaching has been called to contribute to citizenship insofar as it requires scientific competencies such as articulating theory and evidence, and the critical evaluation of different points of view. To promote argumentation in science teaching is key but not simple and requires teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of argumentation. International literature has reported low PCK of argumentation in science teachers, but we scarcely know about this in Spanish speaking countries. is paper reports a study aimed at describing the PCK of argumentation on 10 primary science teachers in Chile. Lessons were video recorded, and interviews were conducted. Results show low PCK of argumentation overall, and declarative PCK does not necessarily relates with procedimental PCK. Moreover, different configurations of the dimensions of PCK of argumentation were observed, suggesting that there is not one possible learning progression, but different ones. Educational and scientific implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Las competencias en salud ambiental en los libros de texto Una propuesta para el diseño de actividades que desarrollen el pensamiento crítico en el aula de ciencias Investigaciones sobre el uso de analogías en el aula de ciencias: una revisión sistemática El experimento de Michelson y Morley en versión acústica, un trabajo de laboratorio de física universitaria basado en aprendizaje por indagación La tabla periódica y las lenguas de signos. Una revisión sistematizada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1