单中心结果磁共振成像超声引导下获得患者前列腺活检

S. Yılmaz, H. C. Aybal, H. Özdemir, E. Gazel, E. Kaya, S. Yalçın, M. Yılmaz, A. Oner, M. Yorubulut, L. Tunc
{"title":"单中心结果磁共振成像超声引导下获得患者前列腺活检","authors":"S. Yılmaz, H. C. Aybal, H. Özdemir, E. Gazel, E. Kaya, S. Yalçın, M. Yılmaz, A. Oner, M. Yorubulut, L. Tunc","doi":"10.33719/yud.2021;16-2-850577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy (MRI- US FPBx) results from a single center and to compare with current literature. \nMaterial and Methods: Between January 2016 and July 2019, MRI-US FPBx pathological and imaging results of 358 men were retrospectively analyzed. PI-RADS scores were determined as 3, 4 and 5 in 222 (62%), 107 (29.8%) and 29 (8.1%) patients, respectively. Totally 454 lesions were underwent MRI-US FPBx. 303 (66.7%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 3, 120 (26.4%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 4 and 31 (6.8%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 5. 315 (69.3%) of lesions were in peripheral zone, 26 (5.7%) were in central zone, 111 (24.4%) were in transitional zone and 2 of them were in anterior fibromuscular stroma. \nResults: Overall prostate cancer detection rate was 36.3%. Concerning detection rates, MRI-US FPBx alone and transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) alone were 27.6% and 26.5%, respectively. Cancer detection rate only through MRI-US FPBx PIRADS-3 and PI-RADS 4&5 were 6.9% and 20.6%, respectively. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) rates were evaluated and csPCa to overall prostate cancer (PCa) rates for TRUS-Bx, MRI-US FPBx and combined techniques were 16.8%, 35.4% and 39.2%, respectively. Results of 11 patients were evaluated as benign. \nConclusion: MRI-US FPBx significantly increases success rate of prostate biopsy procedure. Regarding current MRI technology, it is not appropriate to consider MRI-US FPBx as a stand-alone biopsy option without concomitant with TRUS-Bx. \nKeywords: prostate cancer; biopsy; MRI; fusion","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single center results of magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound guided\\nfusion prostate biopsy obtained patients\",\"authors\":\"S. Yılmaz, H. C. Aybal, H. Özdemir, E. Gazel, E. Kaya, S. Yalçın, M. Yılmaz, A. Oner, M. Yorubulut, L. Tunc\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/yud.2021;16-2-850577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: We aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy (MRI- US FPBx) results from a single center and to compare with current literature. \\nMaterial and Methods: Between January 2016 and July 2019, MRI-US FPBx pathological and imaging results of 358 men were retrospectively analyzed. PI-RADS scores were determined as 3, 4 and 5 in 222 (62%), 107 (29.8%) and 29 (8.1%) patients, respectively. Totally 454 lesions were underwent MRI-US FPBx. 303 (66.7%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 3, 120 (26.4%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 4 and 31 (6.8%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 5. 315 (69.3%) of lesions were in peripheral zone, 26 (5.7%) were in central zone, 111 (24.4%) were in transitional zone and 2 of them were in anterior fibromuscular stroma. \\nResults: Overall prostate cancer detection rate was 36.3%. Concerning detection rates, MRI-US FPBx alone and transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) alone were 27.6% and 26.5%, respectively. Cancer detection rate only through MRI-US FPBx PIRADS-3 and PI-RADS 4&5 were 6.9% and 20.6%, respectively. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) rates were evaluated and csPCa to overall prostate cancer (PCa) rates for TRUS-Bx, MRI-US FPBx and combined techniques were 16.8%, 35.4% and 39.2%, respectively. Results of 11 patients were evaluated as benign. \\nConclusion: MRI-US FPBx significantly increases success rate of prostate biopsy procedure. Regarding current MRI technology, it is not appropriate to consider MRI-US FPBx as a stand-alone biopsy option without concomitant with TRUS-Bx. \\nKeywords: prostate cancer; biopsy; MRI; fusion\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2021;16-2-850577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2021;16-2-850577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评价磁共振成像-超声引导下前列腺活检(MRI- US FPBx)的单中心结果,并与现有文献进行比较。材料与方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年7月期间358例男性的MRI-US FPBx病理和影像学结果。222例(62%)、107例(29.8%)和29例(8.1%)患者PI-RADS评分分别为3、4和5分。共454个病灶行MRI-US FPBx检查。PI-RADS 3级病变303例(66.7%),PI-RADS 4级病变120例(26.4%),PI-RADS 5级病变31例(6.8%)。外周区315例(69.3%),中央区26例(5.7%),过渡区111例(24.4%),前纤维肌间质2例。结果:前列腺癌总检出率为36.3%。MRI-US FPBx单独检查检出率为27.6%,经直肠超声引导前列腺活检(truss - bx)单独检查检出率为26.5%。仅通过MRI-US FPBx PIRADS-3和PI-RADS 4&5的癌症检出率分别为6.9%和20.6%。评估临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)发生率,发现TRUS-Bx、MRI-US FPBx及联合技术的csPCa /总前列腺癌(PCa)发生率分别为16.8%、35.4%和39.2%。结果11例为良性。结论:MRI-US FPBx可显著提高前列腺活检的成功率。就目前的MRI技术而言,将MRI- us FPBx作为单独的活检选择而不与truss - bx联合使用是不合适的。关键词:前列腺癌;活组织检查;核磁共振;融合
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single center results of magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy obtained patients
Objective: We aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy (MRI- US FPBx) results from a single center and to compare with current literature. Material and Methods: Between January 2016 and July 2019, MRI-US FPBx pathological and imaging results of 358 men were retrospectively analyzed. PI-RADS scores were determined as 3, 4 and 5 in 222 (62%), 107 (29.8%) and 29 (8.1%) patients, respectively. Totally 454 lesions were underwent MRI-US FPBx. 303 (66.7%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 3, 120 (26.4%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 4 and 31 (6.8%) lesions were scored as PI-RADS 5. 315 (69.3%) of lesions were in peripheral zone, 26 (5.7%) were in central zone, 111 (24.4%) were in transitional zone and 2 of them were in anterior fibromuscular stroma. Results: Overall prostate cancer detection rate was 36.3%. Concerning detection rates, MRI-US FPBx alone and transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) alone were 27.6% and 26.5%, respectively. Cancer detection rate only through MRI-US FPBx PIRADS-3 and PI-RADS 4&5 were 6.9% and 20.6%, respectively. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) rates were evaluated and csPCa to overall prostate cancer (PCa) rates for TRUS-Bx, MRI-US FPBx and combined techniques were 16.8%, 35.4% and 39.2%, respectively. Results of 11 patients were evaluated as benign. Conclusion: MRI-US FPBx significantly increases success rate of prostate biopsy procedure. Regarding current MRI technology, it is not appropriate to consider MRI-US FPBx as a stand-alone biopsy option without concomitant with TRUS-Bx. Keywords: prostate cancer; biopsy; MRI; fusion
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1