YouTube视频中关于前列腺融合活检的信息质量

T. Aydoğan
{"title":"YouTube视频中关于前列腺融合活检的信息质量","authors":"T. Aydoğan","doi":"10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1105871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of videos on YouTube related to MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy.  Material and Methods: A YouTube search was made on March 16, 2022, for the videos related to “MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy”. The first 70 videos were ranked during this study by choosing “relevance” as a criterion. Video content quality was evaluated using the internationally validated Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Score (JAMAS) and Global Quality Score (GQS). The researcher also developed MRI-TRUS Prostate Fusion Biopsy Scoring (MTPFBS) to evaluate videos’ technical content. The upload origin and length of video view count, like and dislike ratios, and video power indexes (VPI) were all evaluated.  Results: Video content from academic center sources had significantly higher GQS scores than scientific meetings or private institution videos. Video content prepared by private institution sources had significantly lower MTPFBS and JAMA scores than other videos (p<0.05). According to the type of information, videos uploaded with voice and writing had significantly higher JAMAS and MTPFBS than voice alone (p<0.05). The length of videos showed a positive correlation with JAMA and MTPFBS. VPI and the number of likes showed a strong correlation. However, VPI or the number of likes did not correlate with GQS, JAMAS, and MTPFBS scores.  Conclusion: Evaluated on YouTube, the MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy videos were low quality. In that regard, videos prepared by specialists and academic centers should be standardized to transfer better quality information. According to current data, watching these video contents may not be recommended. Keywords: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; internet","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of information in YouTube videos on prostate fusion biopsy\",\"authors\":\"T. Aydoğan\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1105871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of videos on YouTube related to MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy.  Material and Methods: A YouTube search was made on March 16, 2022, for the videos related to “MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy”. The first 70 videos were ranked during this study by choosing “relevance” as a criterion. Video content quality was evaluated using the internationally validated Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Score (JAMAS) and Global Quality Score (GQS). The researcher also developed MRI-TRUS Prostate Fusion Biopsy Scoring (MTPFBS) to evaluate videos’ technical content. The upload origin and length of video view count, like and dislike ratios, and video power indexes (VPI) were all evaluated.  Results: Video content from academic center sources had significantly higher GQS scores than scientific meetings or private institution videos. Video content prepared by private institution sources had significantly lower MTPFBS and JAMA scores than other videos (p<0.05). According to the type of information, videos uploaded with voice and writing had significantly higher JAMAS and MTPFBS than voice alone (p<0.05). The length of videos showed a positive correlation with JAMA and MTPFBS. VPI and the number of likes showed a strong correlation. However, VPI or the number of likes did not correlate with GQS, JAMAS, and MTPFBS scores.  Conclusion: Evaluated on YouTube, the MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy videos were low quality. In that regard, videos prepared by specialists and academic centers should be standardized to transfer better quality information. According to current data, watching these video contents may not be recommended. Keywords: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; internet\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1105871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1105871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估YouTube上与MRI-TRUS前列腺融合活检相关的视频质量。材料与方法:于2022年3月16日在YouTube上搜索“MRI-TRUS前列腺融合活检”相关视频。在这项研究中,前70个视频以“相关性”为标准进行排名。视频内容质量采用国际认可的美国医学协会基准评分(JAMAS)和全球质量评分(GQS)进行评估。研究人员还开发了MRI-TRUS前列腺融合活检评分(MTPFBS)来评估视频的技术内容。对视频的上传起点和视频长度、观看次数、喜欢和不喜欢的比率以及视频功率指数(VPI)进行了评估。结果:来自学术中心的视频内容的GQS得分明显高于科学会议或私人机构视频。私立机构视频的MTPFBS和JAMA评分显著低于其他视频(p<0.05)。根据信息类型,语音和文字上传的视频的JAMAS和MTPFBS显著高于单纯的语音上传(p<0.05)。视频长度与JAMA和MTPFBS呈正相关。VPI和点赞数表现出很强的相关性。然而,VPI或点赞数与GQS、JAMAS和MTPFBS得分无关。结论:YouTube上的MRI-TRUS前列腺融合活检视频质量较差。在这方面,应使专家和学术中心制作的录象录像标准化,以便传送质量更好的资料。根据目前的数据,可能不建议观看这些视频内容。关键词:多参数磁共振成像;前列腺癌;互联网
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of information in YouTube videos on prostate fusion biopsy
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of videos on YouTube related to MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy.  Material and Methods: A YouTube search was made on March 16, 2022, for the videos related to “MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy”. The first 70 videos were ranked during this study by choosing “relevance” as a criterion. Video content quality was evaluated using the internationally validated Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Score (JAMAS) and Global Quality Score (GQS). The researcher also developed MRI-TRUS Prostate Fusion Biopsy Scoring (MTPFBS) to evaluate videos’ technical content. The upload origin and length of video view count, like and dislike ratios, and video power indexes (VPI) were all evaluated.  Results: Video content from academic center sources had significantly higher GQS scores than scientific meetings or private institution videos. Video content prepared by private institution sources had significantly lower MTPFBS and JAMA scores than other videos (p<0.05). According to the type of information, videos uploaded with voice and writing had significantly higher JAMAS and MTPFBS than voice alone (p<0.05). The length of videos showed a positive correlation with JAMA and MTPFBS. VPI and the number of likes showed a strong correlation. However, VPI or the number of likes did not correlate with GQS, JAMAS, and MTPFBS scores.  Conclusion: Evaluated on YouTube, the MRI-TRUS prostate fusion biopsy videos were low quality. In that regard, videos prepared by specialists and academic centers should be standardized to transfer better quality information. According to current data, watching these video contents may not be recommended. Keywords: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; internet
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1