在复杂肾肿瘤的机器人辅助腹腔镜保肾手术中,单层肾修补术能否应用止血剂?

T. Aydoğan, M. Binbay
{"title":"在复杂肾肿瘤的机器人辅助腹腔镜保肾手术中,单层肾修补术能否应用止血剂?","authors":"T. Aydoğan, M. Binbay","doi":"10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1191867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare outcomes of single- layer renorrhaphy suturing and hemostatic agent application with double-layer renorrhaphy among complex renal tumors. Material and Methods: 51 patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy due to complex renal tumors (PADUA score ≥10) between August 2017 and February 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. A double-layer renorrhaphy was applied in 36 patients (Group 1), and a single-layer renorrhaphy plus hemostatic agent FloSeal® (Baxter Medical, Fremont, CA) was applied in 15 patients (Group 2). Pre- and post-operative serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin levels, surgical and warm ischemia time, drainage, hospital stay duration, as well as complications were all evaluated. Results: Group 1 and Group 2 mean PADUA scores were 11 and 10.47, respectively. The mean preoperative, postoperative 1st day and 6th month serum creatinine were 1.02, 1.15 and 1.09 mg/dL in the Group 1 and were 0.93, 1.02 and 0.90 mg/dL in the Group 2, respectively. The mean preoperative, postoperative 1st day and 6th month glomerular filtration rates were 91.47, 77.31 and 81.90 mL/ min/1.73m2 in the Group 1 and were 92.07, 84.93 ve 90.73 mL/min/1.73m2 in the Group 2, respectively. Operation and warm ischemia time were 118min and 23min in the Group 1, and 101min and 13 min in the Group 2, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of drain removal time and hospital stay. Perioperative only Clavien I and II complications were observed with no recurrence during the follow-up. Conclusion: A single-layer of renorrhaphy plus hemostatic agent application can be safely applied in complex renal tumors with a PADUA score between 10-11 undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. Keywords: robotic partial nephrectomy, nephron sparing surgery, renorrhaphy, complex renal tumor","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can a single-layer of renorrhaphy be applied with hemostatic agent in robotassisted laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery applied to complex renal tumors?\",\"authors\":\"T. Aydoğan, M. Binbay\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1191867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare outcomes of single- layer renorrhaphy suturing and hemostatic agent application with double-layer renorrhaphy among complex renal tumors. Material and Methods: 51 patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy due to complex renal tumors (PADUA score ≥10) between August 2017 and February 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. A double-layer renorrhaphy was applied in 36 patients (Group 1), and a single-layer renorrhaphy plus hemostatic agent FloSeal® (Baxter Medical, Fremont, CA) was applied in 15 patients (Group 2). Pre- and post-operative serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin levels, surgical and warm ischemia time, drainage, hospital stay duration, as well as complications were all evaluated. Results: Group 1 and Group 2 mean PADUA scores were 11 and 10.47, respectively. The mean preoperative, postoperative 1st day and 6th month serum creatinine were 1.02, 1.15 and 1.09 mg/dL in the Group 1 and were 0.93, 1.02 and 0.90 mg/dL in the Group 2, respectively. The mean preoperative, postoperative 1st day and 6th month glomerular filtration rates were 91.47, 77.31 and 81.90 mL/ min/1.73m2 in the Group 1 and were 92.07, 84.93 ve 90.73 mL/min/1.73m2 in the Group 2, respectively. Operation and warm ischemia time were 118min and 23min in the Group 1, and 101min and 13 min in the Group 2, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of drain removal time and hospital stay. Perioperative only Clavien I and II complications were observed with no recurrence during the follow-up. Conclusion: A single-layer of renorrhaphy plus hemostatic agent application can be safely applied in complex renal tumors with a PADUA score between 10-11 undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. Keywords: robotic partial nephrectomy, nephron sparing surgery, renorrhaphy, complex renal tumor\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1191867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1191867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较复杂肾肿瘤单层再缝合与双层再缝合止血的效果。材料和方法:回顾性纳入2017年8月至2021年2月期间51例因复杂肾脏肿瘤(PADUA评分≥10)接受机器人部分肾切除术的患者。36例患者采用双层再缝合术(第一组),15例患者采用单层再缝合术加止血剂FloSeal®(Baxter Medical, Fremont, CA)。评估术前和术后血清肌酐、肾小球滤过率、血红蛋白水平、手术和热缺血时间、引流、住院时间及并发症。结果:1、2组患者平均PADUA评分分别为11分、10.47分。1组患者术前、术后第1天、第6个月平均血清肌酐分别为1.02、1.15、1.09 mg/dL, 2组患者平均肌酐为0.93、1.02、0.90 mg/dL。术前、术后第1天、第6个月肾小球滤过率1组平均为91.47、77.31、81.90 mL/min/1.73m2, 2组平均为92.07、84.93、90.73 mL/min/1.73m2。1组手术时间为118min,热缺血时间为23min, 2组为101min,热缺血时间为13min。两组间引流时间及住院时间差异无统计学意义。围手术期仅观察到Clavien I和II并发症,随访期间无复发。结论:对于PADUA评分在10-11分之间的复杂肾肿瘤行机器人部分肾切除术,单层肾修补加止血剂应用是安全的。关键词:机器人肾部分切除术,保留肾元手术,肾修补术,复杂肾肿瘤
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can a single-layer of renorrhaphy be applied with hemostatic agent in robotassisted laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery applied to complex renal tumors?
Objective: To compare outcomes of single- layer renorrhaphy suturing and hemostatic agent application with double-layer renorrhaphy among complex renal tumors. Material and Methods: 51 patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy due to complex renal tumors (PADUA score ≥10) between August 2017 and February 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. A double-layer renorrhaphy was applied in 36 patients (Group 1), and a single-layer renorrhaphy plus hemostatic agent FloSeal® (Baxter Medical, Fremont, CA) was applied in 15 patients (Group 2). Pre- and post-operative serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin levels, surgical and warm ischemia time, drainage, hospital stay duration, as well as complications were all evaluated. Results: Group 1 and Group 2 mean PADUA scores were 11 and 10.47, respectively. The mean preoperative, postoperative 1st day and 6th month serum creatinine were 1.02, 1.15 and 1.09 mg/dL in the Group 1 and were 0.93, 1.02 and 0.90 mg/dL in the Group 2, respectively. The mean preoperative, postoperative 1st day and 6th month glomerular filtration rates were 91.47, 77.31 and 81.90 mL/ min/1.73m2 in the Group 1 and were 92.07, 84.93 ve 90.73 mL/min/1.73m2 in the Group 2, respectively. Operation and warm ischemia time were 118min and 23min in the Group 1, and 101min and 13 min in the Group 2, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of drain removal time and hospital stay. Perioperative only Clavien I and II complications were observed with no recurrence during the follow-up. Conclusion: A single-layer of renorrhaphy plus hemostatic agent application can be safely applied in complex renal tumors with a PADUA score between 10-11 undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. Keywords: robotic partial nephrectomy, nephron sparing surgery, renorrhaphy, complex renal tumor
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1