与基于物理疗法、按摩疗法和感觉运动锻炼的标准物理疗法相比,综合手工疗法对腰椎间盘切除术后腰椎屈曲功能障碍患者的疗效评估

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION Acta Balneologica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.36740/abal202203102
G. Mańko, Grzegorz Sobański, Kamil Czamara, Filip Georgiew
{"title":"与基于物理疗法、按摩疗法和感觉运动锻炼的标准物理疗法相比,综合手工疗法对腰椎间盘切除术后腰椎屈曲功能障碍患者的疗效评估","authors":"G. Mańko, Grzegorz Sobański, Kamil Czamara, Filip Georgiew","doi":"10.36740/abal202203102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study was to asset the effectiveness of complex manual therapy usage in patients with lumbar flexion dysfunction after discectomy, in comparison to standard physiotherapy based on physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Material and methods: The study was conducted in the participation of 40 patients attending outpatient rehabilitation at ORNR “Krzeszowice” SP ZOZ. Participants were divided into two groups (control and experimental) each one including 20 people. The average patients’ age was 52.75 (± 11.58). The patients had been medically examined before the rehabilitation process implementation and after its completion. The test was carried out using the patient’s card, Laitinen’s scale and mobility tests with a plurimeter. Rehabilitation has taken place for four weeks daily. The exercises of the patients from the experimental group were based on comprehensive manual therapy meanwhile the control group underwent a standard package of physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Results: Two statistically significant phenomena were observed in both groups: decrease of pain in the lower spine and the range motion improvement, nevertheless, both results were significantly greater in the experimental group. Conclusions: Both therapeutic programs indicate an advantageous impact in terms of reducing pain and functioning in everyday life, but the manual therapy is much more effective.","PeriodicalId":42213,"journal":{"name":"Acta Balneologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Effectiveness of Usage Complex Manual Therapy in Patients with Lumbar Flexion Dysfunction After Discectomy, in Comparison to Standard Physiotherapy Based on Physical Therapy, Balneotherapy and Sensorimotor Exercises\",\"authors\":\"G. Mańko, Grzegorz Sobański, Kamil Czamara, Filip Georgiew\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/abal202203102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The purpose of this study was to asset the effectiveness of complex manual therapy usage in patients with lumbar flexion dysfunction after discectomy, in comparison to standard physiotherapy based on physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Material and methods: The study was conducted in the participation of 40 patients attending outpatient rehabilitation at ORNR “Krzeszowice” SP ZOZ. Participants were divided into two groups (control and experimental) each one including 20 people. The average patients’ age was 52.75 (± 11.58). The patients had been medically examined before the rehabilitation process implementation and after its completion. The test was carried out using the patient’s card, Laitinen’s scale and mobility tests with a plurimeter. Rehabilitation has taken place for four weeks daily. The exercises of the patients from the experimental group were based on comprehensive manual therapy meanwhile the control group underwent a standard package of physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Results: Two statistically significant phenomena were observed in both groups: decrease of pain in the lower spine and the range motion improvement, nevertheless, both results were significantly greater in the experimental group. Conclusions: Both therapeutic programs indicate an advantageous impact in terms of reducing pain and functioning in everyday life, but the manual therapy is much more effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Balneologica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Balneologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/abal202203102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Balneologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/abal202203102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估在椎间盘切除术后腰椎屈曲功能障碍患者中使用复杂的手工疗法的有效性,并将其与基于物理疗法、按摩疗法和感觉运动锻炼的标准物理疗法进行比较。材料和方法:本研究在“Krzeszowice”SP ZOZ ORNR门诊康复的40例患者中进行。参与者被分为两组(对照组和实验组),每组20人。患者平均年龄为52.75(±11.58)岁。在康复过程实施之前和完成之后,对患者进行了医学检查。测试使用患者卡片、Laitinen量表和用万用表进行活动能力测试。康复工作每天进行四周。实验组以综合手法治疗为主,对照组以物理治疗、按摩治疗、感觉运动训练为标准。结果:两组均观察到两个有统计学意义的现象:下脊柱疼痛减轻,关节活动度改善,但实验组的结果明显大于对照组。结论:两种治疗方案在减轻疼痛和日常生活功能方面都显示出有利的影响,但手工治疗更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Effectiveness of Usage Complex Manual Therapy in Patients with Lumbar Flexion Dysfunction After Discectomy, in Comparison to Standard Physiotherapy Based on Physical Therapy, Balneotherapy and Sensorimotor Exercises
Aim: The purpose of this study was to asset the effectiveness of complex manual therapy usage in patients with lumbar flexion dysfunction after discectomy, in comparison to standard physiotherapy based on physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Material and methods: The study was conducted in the participation of 40 patients attending outpatient rehabilitation at ORNR “Krzeszowice” SP ZOZ. Participants were divided into two groups (control and experimental) each one including 20 people. The average patients’ age was 52.75 (± 11.58). The patients had been medically examined before the rehabilitation process implementation and after its completion. The test was carried out using the patient’s card, Laitinen’s scale and mobility tests with a plurimeter. Rehabilitation has taken place for four weeks daily. The exercises of the patients from the experimental group were based on comprehensive manual therapy meanwhile the control group underwent a standard package of physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Results: Two statistically significant phenomena were observed in both groups: decrease of pain in the lower spine and the range motion improvement, nevertheless, both results were significantly greater in the experimental group. Conclusions: Both therapeutic programs indicate an advantageous impact in terms of reducing pain and functioning in everyday life, but the manual therapy is much more effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Balneologica
Acta Balneologica REHABILITATION-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular Reaction to Orthostatic Test Among Non-functional Overreaching Athletes with Vegetative Disorders (The Physical Therapist Perspective) Comparative Analysis of Complex Programs of Renewal Treatment of Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis Informal Professional Communication of Rehabilitation Specialists and its Significance for their Practical Activities Complex Rehabilitation of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease The impact of WATSU as Physiotherapy Method on Fatigue for People Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1