测试的两面:中期测试对错误信息效应的影响及其机制

Ning He, Meng Li, Bin Kang, Mengyun Wang, Yunfan Yue
{"title":"测试的两面:中期测试对错误信息效应的影响及其机制","authors":"Ning He, Meng Li, Bin Kang, Mengyun Wang, Yunfan Yue","doi":"10.3724/sp.j.1042.2023.01626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The effect of an interim test on the misinformation effect has been found to have two distinct results. “Retrieval enhanced suggestibility” (RES) refers to the observation that participants who received an interim test were less likely to respond correctly on the final memory test and more likely to report misinformation. “Protective effect of testing” (PET) refers to the observation that an interim test weakened the misinformation effect and improved participants’ memory performance. A systematic review of existing studies shows that these two phenomena can be explained by the reconsolidation account, the attention capture hypothesis, and the retrieval fluency hypothesis (for RES), or by the memory strength theory, the retrieval effort theory, and the discrepancy detection theory (for PET). These related theories differ in both the stage of action and the perspective of explanation, and are integrated into a new theoretical model. In addition, there are some potential influences on the separation of RES and PET, including the original information material, the type of interim test, and the characteristics of the misinformation. Future research should begin with the testing of this theoretical model and expand it in appropriate directions.","PeriodicalId":62025,"journal":{"name":"心理科学进展","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two sides of testing: The influence of interim tests on the misinformation effect and its mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Ning He, Meng Li, Bin Kang, Mengyun Wang, Yunfan Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.3724/sp.j.1042.2023.01626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The effect of an interim test on the misinformation effect has been found to have two distinct results. “Retrieval enhanced suggestibility” (RES) refers to the observation that participants who received an interim test were less likely to respond correctly on the final memory test and more likely to report misinformation. “Protective effect of testing” (PET) refers to the observation that an interim test weakened the misinformation effect and improved participants’ memory performance. A systematic review of existing studies shows that these two phenomena can be explained by the reconsolidation account, the attention capture hypothesis, and the retrieval fluency hypothesis (for RES), or by the memory strength theory, the retrieval effort theory, and the discrepancy detection theory (for PET). These related theories differ in both the stage of action and the perspective of explanation, and are integrated into a new theoretical model. In addition, there are some potential influences on the separation of RES and PET, including the original information material, the type of interim test, and the characteristics of the misinformation. Future research should begin with the testing of this theoretical model and expand it in appropriate directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":62025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"心理科学进展\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"心理科学进展\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2023.01626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"心理科学进展","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2023.01626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项临时测试对错误信息效应的影响已被发现有两个不同的结果。“检索增强暗示性”(RES)指的是观察到接受临时测试的参与者在最终记忆测试中不太可能做出正确的反应,而更有可能报告错误信息。“测试的保护效应”(protection effect of testing, PET)是指观察到临时测试削弱了错误信息效应,提高了参与者的记忆表现。对现有研究的系统回顾表明,这两种现象可以通过再巩固理论、注意捕获假说和检索流畅性假说(针对RES)或记忆强度理论、检索努力理论和差异检测理论(针对PET)来解释。这些相关理论在行动阶段和解释角度上都有所不同,并被整合成一个新的理论模型。此外,RES和PET的分离还存在一些潜在的影响因素,包括原始信息材料、中间测试的类型和错误信息的特征。未来的研究应该从对这一理论模型的检验开始,并在适当的方向上进行扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two sides of testing: The influence of interim tests on the misinformation effect and its mechanism
: The effect of an interim test on the misinformation effect has been found to have two distinct results. “Retrieval enhanced suggestibility” (RES) refers to the observation that participants who received an interim test were less likely to respond correctly on the final memory test and more likely to report misinformation. “Protective effect of testing” (PET) refers to the observation that an interim test weakened the misinformation effect and improved participants’ memory performance. A systematic review of existing studies shows that these two phenomena can be explained by the reconsolidation account, the attention capture hypothesis, and the retrieval fluency hypothesis (for RES), or by the memory strength theory, the retrieval effort theory, and the discrepancy detection theory (for PET). These related theories differ in both the stage of action and the perspective of explanation, and are integrated into a new theoretical model. In addition, there are some potential influences on the separation of RES and PET, including the original information material, the type of interim test, and the characteristics of the misinformation. Future research should begin with the testing of this theoretical model and expand it in appropriate directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4819
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The influence of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on memory in adolescents and the underlying neural mechanisms The formation of user perspective taking and its influence on opportunity belief performance The process motivation model of algorithmic decision-making approach and avoidance The functional mechanism of oxytocin in anxiety detection and extinction among anxiety-susceptible groups The effect of external rewards on declarative memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1