卡拉加底跨境公园野生动物旅游的社区参与

IF 1 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Tourism Review International Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3727/154427220x16059054538746
R. J. Lekgau, T. Tichaawa
{"title":"卡拉加底跨境公园野生动物旅游的社区参与","authors":"R. J. Lekgau, T. Tichaawa","doi":"10.3727/154427220x16059054538746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the nature of community participation in wildlife tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park—a transboundary protected area shared by Botswana and South Africa. Since the opening of the park, much attention has been directed towards stimulating community participation in wildlife tourism and conservation within the protected area in order to reduce poverty and contribute to local development in adjacent communities. Following a qualitative methodology, the study conducted a documentary analysis in which historical documents and policies pertaining to the protected area were examined. Further, the study interviewed 17 key informants and conducted two focus groups with members of the two communities located adjacent to the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park. The study found that although policies had a positive effect on the community participation in wildlife tourism within the park, in Askham the two communities (Khomani San and Mier) had acted autonomously in the involvement in wildlife tourism. Additionally, the study found wildlife tourism in Tsabong to be in its early stages of development and therefore found limited, and hesitant, participation in the sector. Lack of awareness and limited funds were found comprised as the major limitations to community participation in both Tsabong and Askham. The study concludes that community participation is central to obtaining the benefits conceptualized by wildlife tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park.","PeriodicalId":46032,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Review International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Participation in Wildlife Tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park\",\"authors\":\"R. J. Lekgau, T. Tichaawa\",\"doi\":\"10.3727/154427220x16059054538746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the nature of community participation in wildlife tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park—a transboundary protected area shared by Botswana and South Africa. Since the opening of the park, much attention has been directed towards stimulating community participation in wildlife tourism and conservation within the protected area in order to reduce poverty and contribute to local development in adjacent communities. Following a qualitative methodology, the study conducted a documentary analysis in which historical documents and policies pertaining to the protected area were examined. Further, the study interviewed 17 key informants and conducted two focus groups with members of the two communities located adjacent to the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park. The study found that although policies had a positive effect on the community participation in wildlife tourism within the park, in Askham the two communities (Khomani San and Mier) had acted autonomously in the involvement in wildlife tourism. Additionally, the study found wildlife tourism in Tsabong to be in its early stages of development and therefore found limited, and hesitant, participation in the sector. Lack of awareness and limited funds were found comprised as the major limitations to community participation in both Tsabong and Askham. The study concludes that community participation is central to obtaining the benefits conceptualized by wildlife tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tourism Review International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tourism Review International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3727/154427220x16059054538746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Review International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/154427220x16059054538746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究考察了博茨瓦纳和南非共享的跨界保护区Kgalagadi跨境公园社区参与野生动物旅游的性质。自公园开放以来,人们一直把注意力放在刺激社区参与保护区内的野生动物旅游和保护上,以减少贫困并促进邻近社区的当地发展。根据定性方法,该研究进行了文献分析,其中审查了与保护区有关的历史文件和政策。此外,该研究还采访了17名关键线人,并与毗邻Kgalagadi跨境公园的两个社区成员进行了两次焦点小组讨论。研究发现,虽然政策对社区参与公园内野生动物旅游有积极影响,但在Askham,两个社区(Khomani San和Mier)在参与野生动物旅游方面采取了自主行动。此外,该研究发现,札蓬的野生动物旅游还处于发展的早期阶段,因此人们对该行业的参与有限,而且犹豫不决。人们发现,缺乏认识和资金有限是社区参与Tsabong和Askham的主要限制因素。该研究的结论是,社区参与是获得卡拉加迪跨境公园野生动物旅游所构想的利益的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community Participation in Wildlife Tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park
This study examined the nature of community participation in wildlife tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park—a transboundary protected area shared by Botswana and South Africa. Since the opening of the park, much attention has been directed towards stimulating community participation in wildlife tourism and conservation within the protected area in order to reduce poverty and contribute to local development in adjacent communities. Following a qualitative methodology, the study conducted a documentary analysis in which historical documents and policies pertaining to the protected area were examined. Further, the study interviewed 17 key informants and conducted two focus groups with members of the two communities located adjacent to the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park. The study found that although policies had a positive effect on the community participation in wildlife tourism within the park, in Askham the two communities (Khomani San and Mier) had acted autonomously in the involvement in wildlife tourism. Additionally, the study found wildlife tourism in Tsabong to be in its early stages of development and therefore found limited, and hesitant, participation in the sector. Lack of awareness and limited funds were found comprised as the major limitations to community participation in both Tsabong and Askham. The study concludes that community participation is central to obtaining the benefits conceptualized by wildlife tourism in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tourism Review International
Tourism Review International HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Guides’ Interpretive Techniques in Cocreation Combined with the Experience Broker Theory Understanding Chinese Tourists’ Future Travel Intention to Thailand: A Hybrid Approach Using Pls-Sem and fsQCA Collaboration and Destination Marketing: Creating Film-Induced Tourism Tourism and Classic Diplomacy: the Case of Strengthening Israeli–tanzanian Bilateral Relations International Travel and Insurance Purchase: the Role of Traveling Companion, Household Income, Travel Risk, and Sufficient Financial Resources on this Relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1