不同温度范围下蒸汽压缩制冷系统的能量和经济分析

Zhili Sun, Cui Qi, Qingzhao Liu, Caiyun Wang, Jiamei Li, Yang Lijie
{"title":"不同温度范围下蒸汽压缩制冷系统的能量和经济分析","authors":"Zhili Sun, Cui Qi, Qingzhao Liu, Caiyun Wang, Jiamei Li, Yang Lijie","doi":"10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine the suitable vapour compression refrigeration system for different temperature ranges, this paper established thermodynamic models for a single-stage vapour compression refrigeration system with an economiser (SSRS+E), a two-stage vapour compression refrigeration system (TSRS), and a cascade vapour compression refrigeration system (CRS) and conducted an energetic and economic analysis of it. The results show that compared with TSRS, SSRS+E can save energy by 13.6% and 7.1%, in the evaporating temperatures of -20°C and -25°C, respectively. R744/R717 CRS is superior to TSRS in terms of energy consumption and refrigeration unit investment costs. Compared with TSRS, R744/R717 CRS can save energy by 14.1% and 18.8%, in the evaporating temperatures of -45°C and -50°C, respectively. Based on the energetic and economic analysis, SSRS+E is recommended for use above the evaporating temperature of -25°C. TSRS is recommended for use in the evaporating temperature range of -45°C to -25°C, and R744/R717 CRS is recommended for use below the evaporating temperature of -45°C.","PeriodicalId":35587,"journal":{"name":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energetic and economic analysis of vapour compression refrigeration systems applied in different temperature ranges\",\"authors\":\"Zhili Sun, Cui Qi, Qingzhao Liu, Caiyun Wang, Jiamei Li, Yang Lijie\",\"doi\":\"10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To determine the suitable vapour compression refrigeration system for different temperature ranges, this paper established thermodynamic models for a single-stage vapour compression refrigeration system with an economiser (SSRS+E), a two-stage vapour compression refrigeration system (TSRS), and a cascade vapour compression refrigeration system (CRS) and conducted an energetic and economic analysis of it. The results show that compared with TSRS, SSRS+E can save energy by 13.6% and 7.1%, in the evaporating temperatures of -20°C and -25°C, respectively. R744/R717 CRS is superior to TSRS in terms of energy consumption and refrigeration unit investment costs. Compared with TSRS, R744/R717 CRS can save energy by 14.1% and 18.8%, in the evaporating temperatures of -45°C and -50°C, respectively. Based on the energetic and economic analysis, SSRS+E is recommended for use above the evaporating temperature of -25°C. TSRS is recommended for use in the evaporating temperature range of -45°C to -25°C, and R744/R717 CRS is recommended for use below the evaporating temperature of -45°C.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确定适合不同温度范围的蒸汽压缩制冷系统,本文分别建立了单级省煤器蒸汽压缩制冷系统(SSRS+E)、两级蒸汽压缩制冷系统(TSRS)和叶栅蒸汽压缩制冷系统(CRS)的热力学模型,并对其进行了能量和经济分析。结果表明,在蒸发温度为-20℃和-25℃时,与TSRS相比,SSRS+E分别节能13.6%和7.1%。R744/R717 CRS在能耗和制冷机组投资成本方面优于TSRS。与TSRS相比,R744/R717 CRS在蒸发温度为-45℃和-50℃时分别节能14.1%和18.8%。基于能量和经济分析,SSRS+E推荐在蒸发温度-25℃以上使用。推荐在-45℃~ -25℃蒸发温度范围内使用TSRS,推荐在-45℃蒸发温度以下使用R744/R717 CRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energetic and economic analysis of vapour compression refrigeration systems applied in different temperature ranges
To determine the suitable vapour compression refrigeration system for different temperature ranges, this paper established thermodynamic models for a single-stage vapour compression refrigeration system with an economiser (SSRS+E), a two-stage vapour compression refrigeration system (TSRS), and a cascade vapour compression refrigeration system (CRS) and conducted an energetic and economic analysis of it. The results show that compared with TSRS, SSRS+E can save energy by 13.6% and 7.1%, in the evaporating temperatures of -20°C and -25°C, respectively. R744/R717 CRS is superior to TSRS in terms of energy consumption and refrigeration unit investment costs. Compared with TSRS, R744/R717 CRS can save energy by 14.1% and 18.8%, in the evaporating temperatures of -45°C and -50°C, respectively. Based on the energetic and economic analysis, SSRS+E is recommended for use above the evaporating temperature of -25°C. TSRS is recommended for use in the evaporating temperature range of -45°C to -25°C, and R744/R717 CRS is recommended for use below the evaporating temperature of -45°C.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
First of its kind in Hong Kong - innovative reuse of treated effluent and enhanced energy efficiency for air-conditioning systems Class A Prediction Symposium on Debris Flow Impact Forces on Single and Dual Barriers Simulation-based quantitative methods for vehicle emissions and a CO2 charging policy Land use change in Dhaka City Corporation Area and its impact on transportation: A way forward towards integration into national policies A bibliometric study of carbon neutrality: 2001-2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1